Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Gast, Volker

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.066

CiteScore 2018: 0.97

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.384
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.409

Print + Online
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 51, Issue 1


Is usage more than usage after all? The case of English not that.

Hans-Jörg Schmid
Published Online: 2013-01-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0003


This paper combines the findings of a detailed corpus study and the results of a small-scale experiment in an attempt to support the idea that grammatical knowledge includes knowledge of usage patterns. The linguistic structures investigated are English not that sentences of the type Other people have friends. I have enemies. Not that I care (example taken from the British National Corpus). An in-depth investigation of 1,759 uses of this structure extracted from the British National Corpus reveals that neither their lexico-grammatical environments nor the pragmatic functions they serve are distributed in a random or unpredictable way, but rather pattern to an astonishing extent. This finding prompts the question as to whether the observed patterns are merely a matter of repeated usage driven by recurring pragmatic needs, or instead are represented as part of the linguistic knowledge of individual speakers, i.e., as a part of grammar. In order to answer this question a simple experiment was designed aiming to investigate whether there is a match between the data observed in the corpus (reflecting usage) and the knowledge-based behavior of individual speakers in an offline task (tapping into grammar). 30 native speakers of English participated in a test which put them under severe time pressure while they filled in gaps in short texts. Four gaps targeted uses of not that representing patterns with different frequencies in the corpus. The results of the experiment indicate that the participants were faster and found it easier to activate the structure not that for stimuli targeting frequent patterns than for those targeting very rare types of usage. This is interpreted as evidence for the assumption that frequency-related knowledge about lexico-grammatical and even pragmatic patterns is a part of grammatical knowledge.

Keywords: not that sentence; grammatical knowledge; usage-based models; corpus study; lexico-grammatical patterns; pragmatic patterns; entrenchment; conventionalization; Cloze test

About the article

Institut für Englische Philologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schellingstr. 3, D-80799 München, Germany

Published Online: 2013-01-05

Published in Print: 2013-01-04

Citation Information: , Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 75–116, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0003.

Export Citation

©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

William B. McGregor
English Text Construction, 2017, Volume 10, Number 2
Taiping Deng, Susan Dunlap, and Baoguo Chen
International Journal of Bilingualism, 2017, Volume 21, Number 1, Page 3
Hans-Olav Enger
Word Structure, 2014, Volume 7, Number 2, Page 153

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in