Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.644
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.878

CiteScore 2017: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.418
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.386

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 53, Issue 3

Issues

Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil

Kees Hengeveld
  • Corresponding author
  • Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 210, 1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher
  • Departamento de Estudos Linguísticos e Literários, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Cristóvão Colombo 2265, 15054-000 São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-04-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0010

Abstract

In this paper we argue that the notions generally grouped together under the heading of evidentiality actually belong to four different evidential subcategories, which are different from one another in terms of their semantic scope. The hierarchical, scopal architecture of Functional Discourse Grammar is used to define these four categories. After giving our arguments for this new classification, we test a number of predictions that follow from it concerning the coexistence of evidential subcategories within a language and the co-occurrence of evidential markers in a single clause. We investigate our predictions in a sample of 64 native languages of Brazil. The data from these languages show that the presence of one or more of the four evidential subcategories can be systematically described in terms of an implicational hierarchy.

Keywords: evidentiality; event perception; deduction; inference; reportativity; Functional Discourse Grammar; native languages of Brazil

About the article

Published Online: 2015-04-29

Published in Print: 2015-05-01


Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 479–524, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0010.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Manuel Widmer
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 2018, Volume 40, Number 2, Page 285
[2]
Manuel Widmer
Journal of Historical Linguistics, 2017, Volume 7, Number 1-2
[3]
Stef Spronck
Journal of Pragmatics, 2017, Volume 114, Page 104
[4]
Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio HATTNHER
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 2017, Volume 33, Number 1, Page 159
[5]
Flávia Bezerra de Menezes Hirata-Vale and Taísa Peres de Oliveira
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 2017, Volume 33, Number 1, Page III
[6]
Henrik Bergqvist and Seppo Kittilä
Open Linguistics, 2017, Volume 3, Number 1
[7]
Marize M. Dall’Aglio Hattnher and Kees Hengeveld
Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 2016, Volume 15, Number 0, Page 1
[8]
Mikyung Ahn and Foong Ha Yap
Studies in Language, 2015, Volume 39, Number 1, Page 46

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in