Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.897

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.309
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.158

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 53, Issue 6


Reconstructing speech events: Comparing English and Spanish

Rosario Caballero
  • Corresponding author
  • Departamento de Filologia Moderna, Facultad de Letras, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Camilo Jose Cela s/n, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-10-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0031


In this article I focus on the verbs used to introduce Direct Speech in a corpus of fictional narratives in English and their Spanish translations in order to compare the way these two languages reconstruct speech events in texts by means of verbs of communication (e.g., say/decir, counter/argumentar, declare/manifestar) and other non-speech patterns (e.g., grin/sonreir, scowl/fruncir el ceño). Drawing upon typological research on motion (Talmy 1985, 1988, 1991; Slobin 1996a, 1996b, 2004, 2005, 2006), I address the following questions: (a) How do English and Spanish recreate a speech event by means of the verbs used to introduce Direct Speech?, (b) What does this say about these languages typologically-wise? and (c) Is it congruent with descriptions of Spanish and English as typological opposites in the literature? The hypothesis is that the differences between these two languages do not rest upon lexical availability, but on the weight placed in different speech elements in agreement with two different agendas regarding speech events. While congruent with typological studies, this piece of research attempts to broaden their scope and explore a topic still underexplored.

Keywords: verbs of communication; speech events; typology; satellite-framed languages; verb-framed languages


  • Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen R. 1994. On reporting reporting: The representation of speech in factual and factional narratives. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 295–308. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Collins, Daniel E. 2001. Reanimated voices. Speech reporting in a historical-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Contreras, Hernán. 1988. Los verbos dialogales en inglés y en castellano. Revista de Lingüística Teorica y Aplicada 26. 23–27.Google Scholar

  • De Roeck, Marijke. 1994. A functional typology of speech reports. In Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen & Lone Schack Rasmussen (eds.), Function and expression in functional grammar, 331–351. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Dirven, Rene. 1990. Prototypical uses of grammatical resources in the expression of linguistic action. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization, 267–284. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Dirven, Rene, Louis Goossens, Yvan Putseys & Emma Vorlat. 1982. The scene of linguistic action and its perspectivization by speak, talk, say and tell. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Etxepare, Ricardo. 2008. Quotative constructions in Iberian Spanish. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining, 35–77. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Faber, Pamela B. & Ricardo Mairal Usón. 1999. Constructing a lexicon of English verbs. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Faber, Pamela B. & Jesús Sánchez. 1990. Semántica de prototipos: El campo semántico de los verbos que expresan la manera de hablar frente al de los verbos de sonido en inglés y español. Revista Española de Lingüistica Aplicada 6. 19–29.Google Scholar

  • Filipović, Luna. 2007. Talking about motion: A crosslingual investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

  • Gärdenfors, Peter. 2014. The geometry of meaning. Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Goossens, Louis. 1990. Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3). 323–340.Google Scholar

  • Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages. A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Kissine, Mikhail. 2010. Metaphorical projection, subjectification and English speech act verbs. Folia Linguistica 44(2). 339–370.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Klamer, Marian. 2000. How report verbs become quote markers and complementisers. Lingua 110. 69–98.Google Scholar

  • Lehrer, Adrienne. 1988. Checklist for verbs of speaking. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38(1-4). 143–161.Google Scholar

  • Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Maldonado, Concepción. 1991. Discurso directo y discurso indirecto. Madrid: Taurus Universitaria.Google Scholar

  • Mancera Rueda, Ana. 2009. El discurso referido en teletipos y noticias. CÍRCULO de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 40. 33–61Google Scholar

  • Martínez Vázquez, Montserrat. 2005. Communicative constructions in English and Spanish. In Christopher S. Butler, María de los Ángeles Gómez González & Susana Doval-Suárez (eds.), The dynamics of language use, 79–109. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Mastrofini, Roberta. 2013. English manner of speaking verbs and their Italian translations: A cross-linguistic comparison. ATINER’S Conference Paper Series. http://www.atiner.gr/papers/LNG2013-0552.pdf (accessed 11 March 2014).

  • Paradis, Carita. 2015. Meanings of words: Theory and applications. In Ulrike Haβ & PetraStorjohann (eds.), Wort und Wortschatz. (Handbücher Sprachwissen 3 [Handbook of Words and Lexicon] HSW 3), 274–294. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Plank, Frans. 2005. Delocutive verbs, crosslinguistically. Linguistic Typology 9. 459–491.Google Scholar

  • Popescu, Maria Liliana. 1991. Interpreting the relationship to reality. A lexematic analysis of the verbs denoting reality oriented speech acts in English and Romanian. Tübingen: University of Tübingen dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax and event structure, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rodríguez Ramalle, Teresa. 2008. Estudio sintáctico y discursivo de algunas estructuras enunciativas y citativas del español. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA) 21. 269–288.Google Scholar

  • Rojo, Ana & Javier Valenzuela. 2001. How to say things with words: Ways of saying in English and Spanish. META 46(3). 467–477.Google Scholar

  • Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida. 1988. Semantic extensions into the domain of verbal communication. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics, 507–553. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Sánchez García, Francisco José. 2012. El discurso referido en la prensa española. Barcelona: Octaedro.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan. 1996a. From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In John Gumperz & Stephen Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan. 1996b. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 195–220. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.) Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan. 2005. Relating events in translation. In Dorit Diskin Ravid & Hava Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan. I. 2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 59–81. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Snell-Hornby, Mary. 1983. Verb-descriptivity in German and English: A contrastive study in semantic fields. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

  • Súñer, Margarita. 2000. The syntax of direct quotes with special reference to Spanish and English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 527–578.Google Scholar

  • Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and lexical descriptions, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12. 49–100.Google Scholar

  • Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Paths to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Kathleen Hubbard (ed.) Proceedings of the Seventeenth Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

  • Urban, Margaret & Josef Ruppenhofer. 2001. Shouting and screaming: Manner and noise verbs in communication. Literary and Linguistic Computing 16(1). 73–94.Google Scholar

  • Vanderveken, Daniel. 2009. Meaning and speech acts, vol. 1: Principles of language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Verschueren, Jef. 1980. On speech act verbs. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Verschueren, Jef (ed.). 1987. Linguistic action: Some empirical-conceptual studies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

  • Vicente Mateu, Juan Antonio. 2007. Discurso reproducido e interpretación de la fuerza ilocutiva en la prensa escrita. Revista de Investigación Lingüística 10. 225–242.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1987. English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Zwicky, Arnold M. 1971. In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry 1(1). 1–11Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-10-27

Published in Print: 2015-11-01

Funding: The present research is funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía and Competitividad MINECO (reference: FFI2013-45553-C3-2-P). A preliminary study was partly funded by a grant received from NetWordS- 09-RNP-089 (European Science Foundation).

Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 1391–1431, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0031.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Journal of Linguistics, 2017, Page 1
Rosario Caballero
Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2016, Volume 14, Number 1, Page 209

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in