Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.897

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.309
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.158

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 53, Issue 6 (Nov 2015)

Issues

Moving on and off the timeline in narratives of personal experience written in three languages: A form-function developmental study

Judy R. Kupersmitt
Published Online: 2015-10-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0033

Abstract

This paper explores the construal of temporality in personal narratives written in English, Spanish, and Hebrew, three languages that differ in their morphological marking of tense-aspect. Participants were native speakers of each language in four different age groups from middle childhood across adolescence into adulthood, so taking into account developmental facets of narrative temporality in each language. Focus is on distribution of situations on and off the timeline of the story from the point of view of the linguistic configurations employed by narrators to express the temporal domains of tense and aspect in the three languages at both the intra-clausal and inter-clausal levels. Hebrew was found to differ from Spanish and English, both of which have more enriched system of grammaticized aspect, in the distribution of situations on and off the timeline both developmentally across age groups and in the linguistic means conflated in expression of temporality. The more impoverished system of grammatical aspect in Hebrew led narrators writing in Hebrew to prefer a more linear temporal organization than their counterparts in Spanish and English. The study distinguishes between shared versus language-particular patterns of narrative-embedded temporality from the point of view of linguistic forms and their temporal functions in the context of extended discourse. Results of the study shed light on the interrelations between local linguistic means and the discourse-embedded expression of temporality in narrative development.

Keywords: temporality; personal narrative; tense-aspect; development

References

  • Aisenman, Ravit & Nurit Assayag. 1999. Fact and fiction in evaluating narrative evaluation. In Ravit Aisenman (ed.), Developing literacy across genres, modalities, and languages, vol. 1, 38–57. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press.Google Scholar

  • Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Christiane von Stutterheim. 1994. Temporal relations in narrative: Simultaneity. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 393–455. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Bamberg, Michael & Virginia Marchman. 1994. Foreshadowing and wrapping up in narrative. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 555–592. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. 1978. Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: Universities publishing.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. 1995. Narrative competence and storytelling performance: How children tell stories in different contexts. Journal of Narrative and Life History 5. 285–313.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. 1997. Narrative theory and narrative development: The Labovian impact. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7. 235–244.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. 1998. Typological perspectives on connectivity. In Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition, 203–224. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. 2001. Setting the narrative scene: How children begin to tell a story. In Ayhan A. Aksu-Koç, Carolyn E. Johnson & Keith E. Nelson (eds.), Children’s language, vol. 10, 1–31. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. 2004. Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In Ruth A. Berman (ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence: Trends in language acquisition research, vol. 3, 9–34. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. 2008. The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language 35. 735–771.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Irit Katzenberger. 2004. Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes 38. 57–94.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Yonni Neeman. 1994. Development of linguistic forms: Hebrew. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 285–328. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Bracha Nir-Sagiv. 2004. Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development. Journal of Child Language 31. 339–380.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Bracha Nir-Sagiv. 2009. Clause packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Kaiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özҫalişkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 149–162. New York & London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Dan I. Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Ludo Verhoeven. 2002. Crosslinguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities. Written Language and Literacy 5(1). 1–43.Google Scholar

  • Bocaz, Aura. 1987. La expresión de la simultaneidad en la producción de discurso narrativo infantil. Lenguas Modernas 14. 69–86.Google Scholar

  • Bosque, Ignacio & Violeta Demonte. 1999. Gramática descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol. 2. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, S.A.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan L. 2002. Main clauses are innovative, subordinate clauses are conservative: Consequences for the nature of constructions. In Joan L. Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 1–17. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan L. & Dan I. Slobin. 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58. 265–289.Google Scholar

  • Caenepeel, Mimo & Mark Moens. 1994. Temporal structure and discourse structure. In Co Vet & Carl Vetters (eds.), Tense and aspect in discourse, 5–20. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Caenepeel, Mimo & Görel Sandström. 1992. A discourse-level approach to the past perfect in narrative. In Michel Aurnague (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Semantics of Time, Space, Movement and Spatio-Temporal Reasoning. Toulouse: Université Paul Sabatier.Google Scholar

  • Chafe, Wallace. 1980. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

  • Chafe, Wallace. 1984. How people use adverbial clauses. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

  • Chen, Liang & Jiansheng Guo. 2009. Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 1749–1766.Google Scholar

  • Chvany, Catherine V. 1985. Backgrounded perfectives and plot line imperfectives: Toward a theory of grounding in text. In Michael S. Flier & Alan Timberlake (eds.), The scope of Slavic aspect, 247–273. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1986. Tense and time reference: From meaning to interpretation in the chronological structure of a text. Journal of Literary Semantics 15. 12–22.Google Scholar

  • Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Dasinger, Lisa & Cecile Toupin. 1994. The development of relative clause functions in narrative. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 457–514. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • DeClerck, Renaat. 1994. On so-called “tense simplification” in English. In Co Vet & Carl Vetters (eds.), Tense and aspect in discourse, 77–98. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

  • Dowty, David R. 1982. Tense, time adverbials and compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 5. 23–55.Google Scholar

  • Dry, Helen A. 1981. Sentence aspect and the movement of narrative time. Text 1. 233–240.Google Scholar

  • Dry, Helen A. 1983. The movement of narrative time. Journal of Literary Semantics 12.19–53.Google Scholar

  • Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and narrativity: From medieval performance to modern fiction. Austin: University of Texas press.Google Scholar

  • Fludernik, Monika. 2003. Chronology, time, tense, and experientiality in narrative. Language and Literature 12(2). 117–134.Google Scholar

  • Goldfajn, Tal. 1998. Word order and time in Biblical Hebrew narrative. Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Gordon, Amon. 1982. The development of the participle in Biblical, Mishnaic, and Modern Hebrew. Afroasiatic Linguistics 8(3). 121–179.Google Scholar

  • Green, John N. 1982. The status of Romance auxiliaries of voice. In Nigel Vincent & Martin Harris (eds.), Studies in the romance verb, 97–138. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

  • Hatav, Galia. 1997. The semantics of aspect and modality: Evidence from English and Biblical Hebrew. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Hickmann, Maya. 1995. Discourse organization and the development of reference to person, space, and time. In Paul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), The handbook of child language, 194–218. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Hickmann, Maya. 2003. Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hopper, Paul J. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Talmy Givon (ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax, 213–242. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Hopper, Paul J. 1982. Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in syntax and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.Google Scholar

  • Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2004. Linguistic typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3). 317–349.Google Scholar

  • Jisa, Harriet, Judy Reilly, Ludo Verhoeven, Elisheva Baruch & Elisa Rosado. 2002. Passive voice constructions in written texts: A cross-linguistic developmental study. Written Language and Literacy 5(2). 163–182.Google Scholar

  • Kiefer, Ferenc. 1995. Lexical information and the temporal interpretation of discourse. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays in semantics and pragmatics in honor of Charles J. Fillmore, 111–132. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1997. Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7. 395–415.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

  • Lascarides, Alex & Nicholas Asher. 1993. Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(5). 437–496.

  • MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Matthiessen, Christian & Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 275–329. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • McCabe, Allyssa & Lynn Bliss. 2003. Patterns of narrative discourse. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

  • Muñoz, Carmen. 2012. A cross-linguistic study of narratives with special attention to the progressive: A contrast between English, Spanish and Catalan. In Marzena Watorek, Sandra Benazzo & Maya Hickmann (eds.), Comparative perspectives on language acquisition: A tribute to Clive Perdue, 502–519. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Nippold, Marylin A. 1998. Later language development: The school-age and adolescent years. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar

  • Nir, Bracha & Ruth A. Berman. 2010. Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics 42.744–765.Google Scholar

  • Olbertz, Hella. 1998. Verbal periphrases in a functional grammar of Spanish. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyer.Google Scholar

  • Peterson, Carole & Allyssa McCabe. 1983. Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

  • Ragnarsdóttir, Hrafnhildur, Melina Aparici, Dalia Cahana-Amitay, Janet Van Hell & Anne Viguié. 2002. Verbal structure and content. Written Language and Literacy 5(1). 95–126.Google Scholar

  • Ravid, Dorit & Avraham Avidor. 1998. Acquisition of derived nominals in Hebrew: Developmental and linguistic principles. Journal of Child Language 25. 229–266.Google Scholar

  • Reilly, Judy, Elisheva Baruch, Harriet Jisa & Ruth A. Berman. 2002. Propositional attitudes. Written Language and Literacy 5(2).183–218.Google Scholar

  • Reinhart, Tanya. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22. 779–809.Google Scholar

  • Sandbank, Ana. 2004. Writing narrative texts: A developmental and crosslinguistic study. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense variation in narratives. Language 57. 45–62.Google Scholar

  • Schmiedtová, Barbara. 2004. At the same time…The expression of simultaneity in learner varieties. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1991. Invariant meanings and context-bound functions of tense in Spanish. In Jadranka Gvozdanovic & Theodorus A. J. M. Janssen (eds.), The function of tense in texts, 255–270. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan I. 1987. Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 13. 435–444.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan I. 1991. Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics 1. 7–26.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan, I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In John Gumperz & Stephen Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 17), 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan I. 1997. The universal, the typological and particular in acquisition. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 5: Expanding the contexts, 1–39. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan I. 2003. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought, 157–191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–258. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Carlota S. 2004. The domain of tense. In Jacqueline Gueron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, 597–619. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Carlota S. 2007. Tense and temporal interpretation. Lingua 117(2). 419–436.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, Sandra, A. 1987. “Subordination” and narrative event structure. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 435–454. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Tolchinsky, Liliana & Elisa Rosado. 2005. The effect of literacy, text type, and modality on the use of grammatical means for agency alternation in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 37(2). 209–237.Google Scholar

  • Tomlin, Russell S. 1985. Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5. 85–122.Google Scholar

  • van Dijk, Teun A. 1975. Pragmatics of language and literature. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

  • Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • von Stutterheim, Christiane & Monique Lambert. 2005. Cross-linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In Henriette Hendriks (ed.), The structure of learner varieties, 203–230. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • von Stutterheim, Christiane & Ralf Nüse. 2003. Processes of conceptualization in language production: language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics 41(5). 851–881.Google Scholar

  • Wiemer, Björn. 1997. Narrative units and the temporal organization of ordinary discourse. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7. 245–250.Google Scholar

  • Winskel, Heather. 2007. The expression of temporal relations in Thai children’s narratives. First Language 27(2).133–158.Google Scholar

  • Ziv, Yael. 2001. Discourse markers in colloquial Hebrew: The case of pashut. Hebrew Linguistics 48. 17–29.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-10-27

Published in Print: 2015-11-01


Citation Information: Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0033.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in