Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.897

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.496
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.099

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 53, Issue 6 (Nov 2015)

Issues

Moving on and off the timeline in narratives of personal experience written in three languages: A form-function developmental study

Judy R. Kupersmitt
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Communication Disorders, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-10-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0033

Abstract

This paper explores the construal of temporality in personal narratives written in English, Spanish, and Hebrew, three languages that differ in their morphological marking of tense-aspect. Participants were native speakers of each language in four different age groups from middle childhood across adolescence into adulthood, so taking into account developmental facets of narrative temporality in each language. Focus is on distribution of situations on and off the timeline of the story from the point of view of the linguistic configurations employed by narrators to express the temporal domains of tense and aspect in the three languages at both the intra-clausal and inter-clausal levels. Hebrew was found to differ from Spanish and English, both of which have more enriched system of grammaticized aspect, in the distribution of situations on and off the timeline both developmentally across age groups and in the linguistic means conflated in expression of temporality. The more impoverished system of grammatical aspect in Hebrew led narrators writing in Hebrew to prefer a more linear temporal organization than their counterparts in Spanish and English. The study distinguishes between shared versus language-particular patterns of narrative-embedded temporality from the point of view of linguistic forms and their temporal functions in the context of extended discourse. Results of the study shed light on the interrelations between local linguistic means and the discourse-embedded expression of temporality in narrative development.

Keywords: temporality; personal narrative; tense-aspect; development

References

  • Aisenman, Ravit & Nurit Assayag. 1999. Fact and fiction in evaluating narrative evaluation. In Ravit Aisenman (ed.), Developing literacy across genres, modalities, and languages, vol. 1, 38–57. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press.

  • Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Christiane von Stutterheim. 1994. Temporal relations in narrative: Simultaneity. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 393–455. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Bamberg, Michael & Virginia Marchman. 1994. Foreshadowing and wrapping up in narrative. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 555–592. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman, Ruth A. 1978. Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: Universities publishing.

  • Berman, Ruth A. 1995. Narrative competence and storytelling performance: How children tell stories in different contexts. Journal of Narrative and Life History 5. 285–313.

  • Berman, Ruth A. 1997. Narrative theory and narrative development: The Labovian impact. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7. 235–244.

  • Berman, Ruth A. 1998. Typological perspectives on connectivity. In Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition, 203–224. Bern: Peter Lang.

  • Berman, Ruth A. 2001. Setting the narrative scene: How children begin to tell a story. In Ayhan A. Aksu-Koç, Carolyn E. Johnson & Keith E. Nelson (eds.), Children’s language, vol. 10, 1–31. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman, Ruth A. 2004. Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In Ruth A. Berman (ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence: Trends in language acquisition research, vol. 3, 9–34. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Berman, Ruth A. 2008. The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language 35. 735–771.

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Irit Katzenberger. 2004. Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes 38. 57–94.

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Yonni Neeman. 1994. Development of linguistic forms: Hebrew. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 285–328. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Bracha Nir-Sagiv. 2004. Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development. Journal of Child Language 31. 339–380.

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Bracha Nir-Sagiv. 2009. Clause packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Kaiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özҫalişkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 149–162. New York & London: Psychology Press.

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Dan I. Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman, Ruth A. & Ludo Verhoeven. 2002. Crosslinguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities. Written Language and Literacy 5(1). 1–43.

  • Bocaz, Aura. 1987. La expresión de la simultaneidad en la producción de discurso narrativo infantil. Lenguas Modernas 14. 69–86.

  • Bosque, Ignacio & Violeta Demonte. 1999. Gramática descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol. 2. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, S.A.

  • Bybee, Joan L. 2002. Main clauses are innovative, subordinate clauses are conservative: Consequences for the nature of constructions. In Joan L. Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 1–17. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Bybee, Joan L. & Dan I. Slobin. 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58. 265–289.

  • Caenepeel, Mimo & Mark Moens. 1994. Temporal structure and discourse structure. In Co Vet & Carl Vetters (eds.), Tense and aspect in discourse, 5–20. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Caenepeel, Mimo & Görel Sandström. 1992. A discourse-level approach to the past perfect in narrative. In Michel Aurnague (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Semantics of Time, Space, Movement and Spatio-Temporal Reasoning. Toulouse: Université Paul Sabatier.

  • Chafe, Wallace. 1980. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  • Chafe, Wallace. 1984. How people use adverbial clauses. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

  • Chen, Liang & Jiansheng Guo. 2009. Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 1749–1766.

  • Chvany, Catherine V. 1985. Backgrounded perfectives and plot line imperfectives: Toward a theory of grounding in text. In Michael S. Flier & Alan Timberlake (eds.), The scope of Slavic aspect, 247–273. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1986. Tense and time reference: From meaning to interpretation in the chronological structure of a text. Journal of Literary Semantics 15. 12–22.

  • Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Dasinger, Lisa & Cecile Toupin. 1994. The development of relative clause functions in narrative. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 457–514. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • DeClerck, Renaat. 1994. On so-called “tense simplification” in English. In Co Vet & Carl Vetters (eds.), Tense and aspect in discourse, 77–98. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Dowty, David R. 1982. Tense, time adverbials and compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 5. 23–55.

  • Dry, Helen A. 1981. Sentence aspect and the movement of narrative time. Text 1. 233–240.

  • Dry, Helen A. 1983. The movement of narrative time. Journal of Literary Semantics 12.19–53.

  • Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and narrativity: From medieval performance to modern fiction. Austin: University of Texas press.

  • Fludernik, Monika. 2003. Chronology, time, tense, and experientiality in narrative. Language and Literature 12(2). 117–134.

  • Goldfajn, Tal. 1998. Word order and time in Biblical Hebrew narrative. Clarendon Press: Oxford.

  • Gordon, Amon. 1982. The development of the participle in Biblical, Mishnaic, and Modern Hebrew. Afroasiatic Linguistics 8(3). 121–179.

  • Green, John N. 1982. The status of Romance auxiliaries of voice. In Nigel Vincent & Martin Harris (eds.), Studies in the romance verb, 97–138. London: Croom Helm.

  • Hatav, Galia. 1997. The semantics of aspect and modality: Evidence from English and Biblical Hebrew. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  • Hickmann, Maya. 1995. Discourse organization and the development of reference to person, space, and time. In Paul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), The handbook of child language, 194–218. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Hickmann, Maya. 2003. Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hopper, Paul J. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Talmy Givon (ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax, 213–242. New York: Academic Press.

  • Hopper, Paul J. 1982. Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in syntax and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.

  • Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2004. Linguistic typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3). 317–349.

  • Jisa, Harriet, Judy Reilly, Ludo Verhoeven, Elisheva Baruch & Elisa Rosado. 2002. Passive voice constructions in written texts: A cross-linguistic developmental study. Written Language and Literacy 5(2). 163–182.

  • Kiefer, Ferenc. 1995. Lexical information and the temporal interpretation of discourse. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays in semantics and pragmatics in honor of Charles J. Fillmore, 111–132. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Labov, William. 1997. Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7. 395–415.

  • Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

  • Lascarides, Alex & Nicholas Asher. 1993. Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(5). 437–496.

  • MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Matthiessen, Christian & Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 275–329. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • McCabe, Allyssa & Lynn Bliss. 2003. Patterns of narrative discourse. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Muñoz, Carmen. 2012. A cross-linguistic study of narratives with special attention to the progressive: A contrast between English, Spanish and Catalan. In Marzena Watorek, Sandra Benazzo & Maya Hickmann (eds.), Comparative perspectives on language acquisition: A tribute to Clive Perdue, 502–519. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

  • Nippold, Marylin A. 1998. Later language development: The school-age and adolescent years. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

  • Nir, Bracha & Ruth A. Berman. 2010. Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics 42.744–765.

  • Olbertz, Hella. 1998. Verbal periphrases in a functional grammar of Spanish. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyer.

  • Peterson, Carole & Allyssa McCabe. 1983. Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York: Plenum Press.

  • Ragnarsdóttir, Hrafnhildur, Melina Aparici, Dalia Cahana-Amitay, Janet Van Hell & Anne Viguié. 2002. Verbal structure and content. Written Language and Literacy 5(1). 95–126.

  • Ravid, Dorit & Avraham Avidor. 1998. Acquisition of derived nominals in Hebrew: Developmental and linguistic principles. Journal of Child Language 25. 229–266.

  • Reilly, Judy, Elisheva Baruch, Harriet Jisa & Ruth A. Berman. 2002. Propositional attitudes. Written Language and Literacy 5(2).183–218.

  • Reinhart, Tanya. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22. 779–809.

  • Sandbank, Ana. 2004. Writing narrative texts: A developmental and crosslinguistic study. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University dissertation.

  • Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense variation in narratives. Language 57. 45–62.

  • Schmiedtová, Barbara. 2004. At the same time…The expression of simultaneity in learner varieties. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1991. Invariant meanings and context-bound functions of tense in Spanish. In Jadranka Gvozdanovic & Theodorus A. J. M. Janssen (eds.), The function of tense in texts, 255–270. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • Slobin, Dan I. 1987. Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 13. 435–444.

  • Slobin, Dan I. 1991. Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics 1. 7–26.

  • Slobin, Dan, I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In John Gumperz & Stephen Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 17), 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Slobin, Dan I. 1997. The universal, the typological and particular in acquisition. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 5: Expanding the contexts, 1–39. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Slobin, Dan I. 2003. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought, 157–191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–258. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Smith, Carlota S. 2004. The domain of tense. In Jacqueline Gueron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, 597–619. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Smith, Carlota S. 2007. Tense and temporal interpretation. Lingua 117(2). 419–436.

  • Thompson, Sandra, A. 1987. “Subordination” and narrative event structure. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 435–454. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Tolchinsky, Liliana & Elisa Rosado. 2005. The effect of literacy, text type, and modality on the use of grammatical means for agency alternation in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 37(2). 209–237.

  • Tomlin, Russell S. 1985. Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5. 85–122.

  • van Dijk, Teun A. 1975. Pragmatics of language and literature. Amsterdam: North Holland.

  • Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • von Stutterheim, Christiane & Monique Lambert. 2005. Cross-linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In Henriette Hendriks (ed.), The structure of learner varieties, 203–230. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • von Stutterheim, Christiane & Ralf Nüse. 2003. Processes of conceptualization in language production: language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics 41(5). 851–881.

  • Wiemer, Björn. 1997. Narrative units and the temporal organization of ordinary discourse. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7. 245–250.

  • Winskel, Heather. 2007. The expression of temporal relations in Thai children’s narratives. First Language 27(2).133–158.

  • Ziv, Yael. 2001. Discourse markers in colloquial Hebrew: The case of pashut. Hebrew Linguistics 48. 17–29.

About the article

Published Online: 2015-10-27

Published in Print: 2015-11-01



Citation Information: Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0033. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in