Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.897

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.309
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.158

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 53, Issue 6 (Nov 2015)

Issues

Form and function of the modal adverbs: Recent linguistic change and constancy in British English

Daisuke Suzuki
Published Online: 2015-10-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0035

Abstract

This study examines the modal adverbs in English including doubtless, indeed, no doubt, and of course from a functional perspective. Although an increasing number of studies have investigated “core” modal adverbs (e.g., certainly, possibly, probably), a comprehensive analysis including these four modal adverbs has not been offered in modal adverb studies. The present study begins to address this research gap by providing descriptions of these adverbs using data from the LOB (1961) and FLOB (1991) corpora. To adopt a more comprehensive view of the set of modal adverbs, I compare the behaviors of the modal adverbs without -ly to those with -ly in terms of their discourse and interpersonal functions in the text, and present the relationship between form and function of the modal adverbs. The results of the analysis demonstrate that the modal adverbs that convey the same degree of probability fulfill different functions at the discourse-pragmatic level. Moreover, the modal adverbs without -ly have increased their pragmatic functions over time, thus signaling a short-term diachronic development. Finally, I provide an explanation of this change in terms of grammaticalization and pragmaticalization.

Keywords: modal adverbs; functional analysis; corpus data; discourse; grammaticalization/pragmaticalization

Corpora

  • BNC (XML Edition)=The British National Corpus, version 3. 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Accessed at http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/.

  • FLOB=The Freiburg-LOB Corpus of British English. 1999. Compiled by Christian Mair.

  • LOB=The Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English. 1976. Compiled by Geoffrey Leech, Stig Johansson & Knut Hofland.

References

  • Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think —an English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf J. Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives, 1–47. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Arnovick, Leslie K. 1999. Diachronic pragmatics: Seven case studies in English illocutionary development. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bellert, Irena. 1977. On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2). 337–351.Google Scholar

  • Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech & Susan Conrad. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar

  • Brinton Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114. 683–710.Google Scholar

  • Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2). 365–390.Google Scholar

  • Doherty, Monika. 1987. Perhaps. Folia Linguistica 21(1). 45–65.Google Scholar

  • Erman, Britt. 2001. Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1337–1359.Google Scholar

  • Ernst, Thomas. 1984. Towards an integrated theory of adverb position in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

  • Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ernst, Thomas. 2004. Principles of adverbial distribution in the lower clause. Lingua 114. 755–777.Google Scholar

  • Ernst, Thomas. 2009. Speaker-oriented adverbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27. 497–544.Google Scholar

  • Ernst, Thomas. 2010. Adverbs and light verbs. In Lauren E. Clemens & Chi-Ming L. Liu (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-22) and the 18th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics (IACL-18) 2, 178–195. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar

  • Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fowler, Henry W. 2004. Fowler’s modern English usage, 3rd edn. Revised by Robert W. Burchfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Giegerich, Heinz J. 2012. The morphology of -ly and the categorial status of ‘adverbs’ in English. English Language and Linguistics 16(3). 341–359.Google Scholar

  • Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English adverbial usage. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, Michael A. K. 1970. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6. 322–361.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline—The nature of grammaticalization, 17–44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Hoye, Leo. 1997. Adverbs and modality in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hundt, Marianne. 1997. Has BrE been catching up with AmE over the past 30 years? In Magnus Ljung (ed.), Corpus-based studies in English: Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17), 135–151. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug & Frank R. Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 223–240. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. Recent grammatical change in English: Data, description, theory. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), Advances in corpus linguistics: Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23), 61–81. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey & Nicholas Smith. 2006. Recent grammatical change in written English 1961-1992: Some preliminary findings of a comparison of American with British English. In Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds.), The changing face of corpus linguistics, 186–204. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

  • Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA.Google Scholar

  • Longman language activator, 2nd edn. 2002. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

  • Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mair, Christian. 1997. Parallel corpora: A real-time approach to the study of language change in progress. In Magnus Ljung (ed.), Corpus-based studies in English: Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17), 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

  • Mair, Christian, Marianne Hundt, Geoffrey Leech & Nicholas Smith. 2002. Short term diachronic shifts in part-of-speech frequencies: A comparison of the tagged LOB and F-LOB corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(2). 245–264.Google Scholar

  • Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage. 1994. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar

  • Nevalainen, Terttu. 1997. The processes of adverb derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. In Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen (eds.), Grammaticalization at work: Studies of long-term developments in English, 145–189. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Nilsen, Øystein. 2004. Domains for adverbs. Lingua 114. 809–847.Google Scholar

  • Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Oxford Learner’s Thesaurus: A dictionary of synonyms. 2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Oxford Thesaurus of English, 3rd edn. 2009. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Papafragou, Anna. 2000. Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

  • Papafragou, Anna. 2006. Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 116. 1688–1702.Google Scholar

  • Payne, John, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2010. The distribution and category status of adjectives and adverbs. Word Structure 3(1). 31–81.Google Scholar

  • Perkins, Michael R. 1983. Modal expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar

  • Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer. 2007. The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Dominique Willems. 2011. Crosslinguistic data as evidence in the grammaticalization debate: The case of discourse markers. Linguistics 49(2). 333–364.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Nicholas. 2003. Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug & Frank R. Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 241–266. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Sugioka, Yoko & Rachel Lehr. 1983. Adverbial -ly as an inflectional affix. Chicago Linguistic Society 19(2). 293–300.Google Scholar

  • Swan, Michael. 2005. Practical English usage, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence adverbials in English: A synchronic and diachronic investigation. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar

  • Tancredi, Christopher. 2007. A multi-model modal theory of I-semantics: Part I: Modals. Ms. University of Tokyo.

  • Watts, Richard J. 1984. An analysis of epistemic possibility and probability. English Studies 65(2). 129–140.Google Scholar

  • Zwicky, Arnold M. 1995. Why English adverbial -ly is not inflectional. Papers from the 31st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 31(1). 523–535.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-10-27

Published in Print: 2015-11-01


Funding: This research was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 25·5013).


Citation Information: Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0035.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in