Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, Susana Fernández-Solera, Lyn Frazier & Charles Clifton. 2002. Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Rivista di Linguistica 14(2). 1–19.Google Scholar
Amano, Nariaki & Masahisa Kondo. 2000. NTT database series nihongo-no goikokusei [NTT database series lexical properties of Japanese], vol. 7. Tokyo: Sanseido.
Arnold, Jennifer E. 2001. The effects of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference. Discourse Processes 31. 137–162.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola. 1992. Linguistic correlations between subjects of one-argument verbs and subjects of more-than-one-argument verbs in spoken Spanish. In Paul Hirschbühler & Konrad Koerner (eds.), Romance languages and modern linguistic theory: 20th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XX), Ottawa, 10–14 April 1990, 11–24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah, Donna. K. Byron & Michael Tanenhaus. 2005. Beyond salience: Interpretation of personal and demonstrative pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language 53. 292–313.Google Scholar
Caramazza, Alfonso, Ellen Grober & Catherine Garvey. 1977. Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16. 601–609.Google Scholar
Carminati, Maria N. 2002. The processing of Italian subject pronouns. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Christianson, Kiel & Hee Youn Cho. 2009. Interpreting null pronouns (pro) in isolated sentences. Lingua 119. 989–1008.Google Scholar
Crawley, Rosalind A., Rosemary J. Stevenson & David Kleinman. 1990. The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronoun. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 4. 245–264.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63. 805–855.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Salgueiro, Gerardo, Lillian Chen, Richard Lewis & Samuel Epstein. 2007. The when and how of positing null subjects (pro): The timing and surprising interaction of syntactic and semantic constraints. Poster presented at the 20th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. San Diego, CA.
Ferstl, Evelyn C., Alan Garnham & Christina Manouilidou. 2011. Implicit causality bias in English: A corpus of 300 verbs. Behavior Research Methods 43. 124–135.Google Scholar
Fiengo, Robert & Makiko Haruna. 1987. Parameters in binding theory–Some suggestions based on an analysis of Japanese. In Takashi Imai & Mamoru Saito (eds.), Issues in Japanese linguistics, 107–128. Dordrecht: Foris Publication.Google Scholar
Filiaci, Francesca, Antonella Sorace & Manuel Carreiras. 2014. Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 29. 825–843.Google Scholar
Fry, John. 2003. Ellipsis and wa-marking in Japanese conversation. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garvey, Catherine & Alfonso Caramazza. 1974. Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 459–464.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton A. & David J. Hargreaves. 1988. Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language 27. 699–717.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58, New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69. 274–307.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Understood subjects in English diaries: On the relevance of theoretical syntax for the study of register variation. Multilingua 9. 157–199.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3. 67–90.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R. 1990. Literature and cognition: CSLI lecture notes 21. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hoji, Hajime. 1990. On the so-called overt pronouns in Japanese and Korean. In Eung-Jin Baek (ed.), Papers from the seventh international conference on Korean linguistics, 61–78. Osaka, Japan: International Circle of Korean Linguistics & Osaka University of Economics and Law.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, Osamu. 2008. Diachronic perspectives on personal pronouns in Japanese. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Elsi & John Trueswell. 2008. Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 23. 708–748.Google Scholar
Kameyama, Megumi. 1985. Zero anaphora: The case of Japanese. Stanford, CA: Stanford University doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew. 2002. Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew, Laura Kertz, Hannah Rohde & Jeff Elman. 2008. Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics 25. 1–44.Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew & Hannah Rohde. 2013. A probabilistic reconciliation of coherence-driven and centering-driven theories of pronoun interpretation. Theoretical Linguistics 39. 1–37.Google Scholar
Kim, Kitaek, Theres Grüter & Amy J. Schafer. 2014. Effects of morphological and prosodic focus cues on topic maintenance in Korean. Poster presented at the 27th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Columbus, OH.
Kim, Lucy Kyoungsook & Elsi Kaiser. 2009. Effects of honorific agreement on null subject interpretation in Korean. In Proceedings of 2009 Seoul International Conference on Linguistic Interfaces. Seoul: Yonsei University.
Kim, Kitaek, Grüter Theres & Amy J. Schafer. 2013. Effects of event-structure and topic/focus-marking on pronoun reference in Korean. Poster presented at the 26th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Columbia, SC.
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung & Maria Polinsky. 2011. Anaphoric inventories and bound variable interpretation: Evidence from Korean. Poster presented at the 24th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Stanford University, CA.
Kwon, Nayoung & Patrick Sturt. 2013. Null pronominal (pro) resolution in Korean, a discourse-oriented language. Language and Cognitive Processes 28. 377–387.Google Scholar
Liversedge, Simon P. & Roger P. G. van Gompel. n.d. Resolving anaphoric and cataphoric pronouns. Unpublished ms.
Martin, Samuel E. 1975. A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mazuka, Reiko. 1991. Processing of empty categories in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20. 215–232.Google Scholar
McKoon, Gail, Steven B. Greene & Roger Raticliff. 1993. Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and implicit causality of verbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology 19. 1040–1052.Google Scholar
Nariyama, Shigeko. 2003. Ellipsis and reference tracking in Japanese. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1994. Root null subjects and early null subjects. In Teun Hoekstra & Bonnie Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 151–176. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rohde, Hannah. 2008. Coherence driven effects in sentence and discourse processing. San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Rohde, Hannah & Andrew Kehler. 2008. The bidirectional influence between coherence establishment and pronoun interpretation. Poster presented at the 21st Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Chapel Hill, NC.
Rohde, Hannah, Andrew Kehler & Jeff Elman. 2006. Event structure and discourse coherence biases in pronoun interpretation. In Ron Sun & Noami Miyake (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society, 697–702. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Smyth, Ron. 1994. Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23. 197–229.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Rosemary J., Rosalind A. Crawley & David Kleinman. 1994. Thematic roles, focusing and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes 9. 519–548.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ueno, Mieko & Andrew Kehler. 2010. The interpretation of null and overt pronouns in Japanese: Grammatical and pragmatic factors. In Stellan Ohlsson & Richard Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 2057–2062. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Ueno, Mieko & Maria Polinsky. 2009. Does headedness affect processing? A new look at the VO-OV contrast. Journal of Linguistics 45. 675–710.Google Scholar
Walker, Marilyn, Masayo Iida & Sharon Cote. 1994. Japanese discourse and the process of centering. Computational Linguistics 20. 193–232.Google Scholar
Yang, Chin Lung, Peter C. Gordon, Randall Hendrick & Chih Wei Hue. 2003. Constraining the comprehension of pronominal expressions in Chinese. Cognition 86. 283–315.Google Scholar
Yang, Chin Lung, Peter C. Gordon, Randall Hendrick & Jei Tun Wu. 1999. Comprehension of referring expressions in Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 14. 715–743.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2016-11-08
Published in Print: 2016-11-01
This research was supported by grant number 3R01HD022614-22S1 from the NICHD and a grant from the UCSD Academic Senate.