Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.644
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.878

CiteScore 2017: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.418
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.386

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 55, Issue 5

Issues

Variability in /s/ among transgender speakers: Evidence for a socially grounded account of gender and sibilants

Lal Zimman
Published Online: 2017-09-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0018

Abstract

Sibilant consonants are well-established as resources for the negotiation of gender and sexuality, but the origin of these links is less clearly agreed upon. Some researchers have pointed to sex differentiation in the vocal anatomy as a potential cause for gender differences in /s/, though a review of the literature indicates that learned articulatory patterns play a critical role. This article focuses on the spectral qualities of /s/ among 15 English-speaking transgender men and transmasculine individuals. Because their early socialization and physiological development is not normatively aligned with their self-defined gender identities, trans people are well-positioned to illuminate the relative contribution of physiology and identity to the gendered voice. Two analyses are presented, one of which focuses on inter-speaker variation among all 15 participants, and the other of which compares one bilingual speaker’s productions of /s/ in English and Spanish. Together, these analyses demonstrate that sex category does not determine the gender-linked acoustic characteristics of /s/. Instead, a more complex, multidimensional framework for gender that distinguishes between gender assignment, role, identity, and presentation is necessary to account for the full range of gendered phonetic styles that speakers can employ and hence to understand the process through which gendered voices arise.

Keywords: transgender; sociophonetics; gender; sex; identity; bilingualism

References

  • Alim, H. Samy. 2004. You know my steez: An ethnographic and sociolinguistic study of styleshifting in a Black American speech community. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Avery, Jack D. & Julie M. Liss. 1996. Acoustic characteristics of less-masculine-sounding male speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99(6). 3738–3748.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bauman, Richard & Charles L. Briggs. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19. 59–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bershtling, Orit. 2014. “Speech creates a kind of commitment”: Queering Hebrew. In Lal Zimman, Jenny Davis & Joshua Raclaw (eds.), Queer excursions: Retheorizing binaries in language, gender, and sexuality, 35–61. New York & London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2004. Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33(4). 469–515.Google Scholar

  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1). 32–64.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2011. Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech 86(1). 52–68.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chambers, John M. 1983. Graphical methods for data analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth International Group.Google Scholar

  • Fairbanks, Grant. 1960. Voice and articulation drillbook. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh & Jay Giedd. 1999. Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106(3). 1511–1522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flipsen, Peter Jr., Lawrence Shrilberg, Gary Weismer, Heather Karlsson & McSweeny. Jane 1999. Acoustic characteristics of /s/ in adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42(3). 663–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fuchs, Susanne & Martine Toda. 2010. Do differences in male versus female /s/ reflect biological or sociophonetic factors? In Susanne Fuchs, Martine Toda & Marzena Zygis (eds.), An interdisciplinary guide to turbulent sounds, 281–302. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Garrett, Paul B. & Patricia Baquedano-López. 2002. Language socialization: Reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology 31. 339–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gordon, Matthew, Paul Barthmaier & Kathy Sands. 2002. A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32(2). 141–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heffernan, Kevin. 2004. Evidence from HNR that /s/ is a social marker of gender. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 23(2). 71–84.Google Scholar

  • Kulick, Don & Bambi B. Schieffelin. 2006. Language socialization. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 349–368. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar

  • Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford & Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Levon, Erez. 2007. Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society 36(4). 533–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loveday, Leo. 1981. Pitch, politeness and sexual role: An exploratory Investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Language and Speech 24(1). 71–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martínez-Celdrán, Eugenio, Ana Ma. Fernández-Planas & Josefina Carrera-Sabaté. 2003. Illustrations of the IPA: Castilian Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33(2). 255–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Munson, Benjamin. 2007. The acoustic correlates of perceived sexual orientation, perceived masculinity, and perceived femininity. Language and Speech 50(1). 125–142.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Munson, Benjamin, Elizabeth McDonald, Nancy L. DeBoe & Aubrey R. White. 2006. The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men’s sexual orientation from read speech. Journal of Phonetics 34(2). 202–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nittrouer, Susan. 1995. Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: Evidence from spectral moments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(1). 520–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nittrouer, Susan, Michael Studdert-Kennedy & Richard. S. McGowan. 1989. The emergence of phonetic segments: Evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32(1). 120–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ohara, Yumiko. 2001. Finding one’s voice in Japanese: A study of the pitch levels of L2 users. In Aneta Pavlenko (ed.), Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender, 231–254. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Pharao, Nicolai, Marie Maegaard, Janus Møller, Janus Spindler & Tore Kristiansen. 2014. Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43(1). 1–31.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team. 2015. R: A language environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Schwartz, Martin F. 1968. Identification of speaker sex from isolated voiceless fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 43(5). 1178–1179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shadle, Christine H. 1990. Articulatory-acoustic relationships in fricative consonants. In William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 187–209. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

  • Shadle, Christine H. 1991. The effect of geometry on source mechanisms of fricative consonants. Journal of Phonetics 19(3–4). 409–424.Google Scholar

  • Shadle, Christine Helen. 1985. The acoustics of fricative consonants. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Smyth, Ron, Greg Jacobs & Henry Rogers. 2003. Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society 32(3). 329–350.Google Scholar

  • Strand, Elizabeth A. 1999. Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1). 86–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2007. Empirical evidence for gendered speech production: /s/ in Glaswegian. In Jennifer Cole & José Ignacio Hualde (eds.), Laboratory phonology 9, 65–86. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Tjaden, Kris & Greg S. Turner. 1997. Spectral properties of fricative in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40(6). 1358–1372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yeni-Komishian, Grace H. & Sigfrid D. Soli. 1981. Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: Evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70(4). 966–975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yuasa, Ikuko Patricia. 2008. Culture and gender of voice pitch: A sociophonetic comparison of the Japanese and Americans. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

  • Zimman, Lal. 2012. Voices in transition: Testosterone, transmasculinity, and the gendered voice among female-to-male transgender people. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Boulder dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Zimman, Lal. 2013. Hegemonic masculinity and the variability of gay-sounding speech: The perceived sexuality of transgender men. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(1). 1–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimman, Lal. 2014. The discursive construction of sex: Remaking and reclaiming the gendered body in talk about genitals among trans men. In Lal Zimman, Jenny Davis & Joshua Raclaw (eds.), Queer excursions: Retheorizing binaries in language, gender, and sexuality, 13–34. Oxford, UK & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Zimman, Lal. 2015. Transmasculinity and the voice: Gender assignment, identity, and presentation. In Tommaso Milani (ed.), Language and masculinities: Performances, intersections, dislocations, 197–219. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Zimman, Lal. 2016. Agency and the gendered voice: Metalinguistic rejections of vocal masculinization among female-to-male transgender speakers. In Anna Babel (ed.), Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research, 228–252. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Zimman, Lal. 2017. Gender as stylistic bricolage: Transmasculine voices and the relationship between fundamental frequency and /s/. Language in Society 46(3). 339–370.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-09-21

Published in Print: 2017-09-26


Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 993–1019, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0018.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Lal Zimman
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2018, Page e12284

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in