Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.897

CiteScore 2017: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.418
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.386

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 56, Issue 1

Issues

The word status of Chinese adjective-noun combinations

Zheng Xu
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, P. R. China
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-12-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0035

Abstract

The status of Chinese adjective-noun combinations ([A N]) has been debated for decades. This paper argues that Chinese [A N] are word-level expressions constructed in an autonomous word formation component of the grammar. I propose a monomorphemic constraint on the adjective of [A N]. Together with evidence from the tests of modification by degree adverbs, conjunction reduction, and XP substitution, this constraint supports the wordhood of Chinese [A N]. Additional evidence is that Chinese [A N] have a potential naming function and are subject to selectional restrictions. Neither anaphoric accessibility nor the restrictions on the ordering of adjectives are reliable criteria for establishing the status of Chinese [A N]. The various properties of Chinese [A N] are accounted for under the framework of Construction Morphology (Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.).

Keywords: Chinese; compounds; constructions; word formation; Construction Morphology

References

  • Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco. 2011. A Construction Morphology account of derivation in Mandarin Chinese. Morphology 21. 89–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco. 2012. Lexical derivation in Mandarin Chinese. Taiwan: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Aronoff, Mark & Zheng Xu. 2010. A Realization Optimality-Theoretic approach to affix order. Morphology 20. 381–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, Mark. 2003. Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bauer, Laurie. 2003. Introducing linguistic morphology, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bhat, D. N. S. 1994. The adjectival category: Criteria for differentiation and identification. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42. 531–573.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18. 1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Booij, Geert. 1985. Coordination reduction in complex words: A case for prosodic phonology. In Harry Van Der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), Advances in non-linear phonology, 143–160. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Booij, Geert. 2002. Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14(3). 301–329.Google Scholar

  • Booij, Geert. 2009. Lexical integrity as a formal universal: A constructionist view. In Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, 83–100. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bresnan, Joan & Sam A. Mchombo. 1995. The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13. 181–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, Dunstan & Andrew Hippisley. 2012. Network Morphology: A defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Chaves, Rui P. 2008. Linearization-based word-part ellipsis. Linguistics & Philosophy 31. 261–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, Qiongzan. 1955. Xiushiyu he mingci zhi jian de ‘de’ zi de yanjiu [An investigation of de between modifier and noun]. Zhongguo Yuwen 10. 22–27.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 239–297.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Dai, John Xiangling. 1992. Chinese morphology and its interface with the syntax. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Downing, Pamela. 1977. On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 53. 810–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duanmu, San. 1990. A formal study of syllable, tone, stress, and domain in Chinese languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Duanmu, San. 1998. Wordhood in Chinese. In Jerome Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word-formation: Morphology, phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese, 135–196. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Duanmu, San. 2000. The phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Duanmu, San. 2007. The phonology of Standard Chinese, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Duanmu, San. 2012. Word-length preferences in Chinese: A corpus study. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21(1). 89–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Erben, Johannes. 2000. Einführung in die deutsche Wortbildungslehre. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Fan, Jiyan. 1958. Xing-ming zuhe jian de zi de yufa zuoyong [The grammatical function of de in adjective-noun constructions]. Zhongguo Yuwen 1958(5). 213–217.Google Scholar

  • Feng, Shengli. 1998. Lun hanyu de “ziran yinbu” [On “natural feet” in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 1. 40–47.Google Scholar

  • Feng, Shengli. 2001. Lun hanyu ci de duo-wei-xing [The multidimensional properties of word in Chinese]. Contemporary Linguistics 3(3). 161–174.Google Scholar

  • Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay & Mary C. O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64. 501–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flickinger, Daniel Paul. 1987. Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Fu, Jingqi. 1987. La structure du syntagme nominal en chinois. University of Paris dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Harris, Alice C. 2006. Revisiting anaphoric islands. Language 82(1). 114–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hippisley, Andrew. 2001. Word formation rules in a default inheritance framework: A Network Morphology account of Russian personal names. In Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000, 221–261. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

  • Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Huang, James C.-T. 1984. Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 19(2). 53–78.Google Scholar

  • Huang, Shi-Zhe. 2006. Property theory, adjectives, and modification in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15. 343–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hüning, Matthias. 2010. Adjective + Noun constructions between syntax and word formation in Dutch and German. In Alexander Onysko & Sascha Michel (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on word formation, 195–215. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Inkelas, Sharon & Cheryll Zoll. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 2009. Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 105–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kay, Paul & Charles Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations. Language 75. 1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kilbury, James, Wiebke Petersen & Christoph Rumpf. 2006. Inheritance-based models of the lexicon. In Dieter Wunderlich (ed.), Advances in the theory of the lexicon, 429–480. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Koefoed, Geert. 1993. Benoemen: Een beschouwing over de faculté du langage. Amsterdam: P. J. Meertens-Instituut.Google Scholar

  • König, Jean-Pierre. 1999. Lexical relations. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar

  • Krieger, Hans-Ulrich & John Nerbonne. 1993. Feature-based inheritance networks for computational lexicons. In Ted Briscoe, Valeria De Paiva & Ann Copestake (eds.), Inheritance, defaults, and the lexicon, 90–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lapointe, Steven G. 1979. A lexical analysis of the English auxiliary verb system. GLOT 2. 215–254.Google Scholar

  • Lapointe, Steven G. 1980. A theory of grammatical agreement. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Larson, Richard & Gabriel Segal. 1995. Knowledge of meaning: An introduction to semantic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Leben, William. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Lieber, Rochelle. 1984. Grammatical rules and sublexical elements. In David Testen, Veena Mishra & Joseph Drogo (eds.), Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics, 187–199. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

  • Lu, Bingfu. 1990. The structure of Chinese nominal phrases. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut master thesis. (Published in Comparative studies on the structure of noun phrases, Research Report (PI: Mamoru Saito), Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 1–50.).Google Scholar

  • Lu, Bingfu & San Duanmu. 1991. A case study of the relation between rhythm and syntax in Chinese. Paper presented at the Third North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics. Cornell University.Google Scholar

  • Lu, Bingfu & San Duanmu. 2002. Rhythm and syntax in Chinese: A case study. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 37(2). 123–136.Google Scholar

  • Lu, Jianming. 1985. Duo he shao zuo dingyu [Duo ‘many’ and shao ‘few’ as modifiers]. Zhongguo Yuwen 1. 71–75.Google Scholar

  • McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1993. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Rutgers University.Google Scholar

  • McCawley, James D. 1992. Justifying part-of-speech assignments in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 20(2). 211–246.Google Scholar

  • Miller, Philip H., Geoffrey K. Pullum & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1997. The principle of phonology-free syntax: Four apparent counterexamples in French. Journal of Linguistics 33. 67–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milsark, Gary. 1988. Singl-ing. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4). 611–634.Google Scholar

  • Packard, Jerome L. 2000. The morphology of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Paster, Mary. 2005. Pulaar verbal extensions and phonologically driven affix order. In Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2005, 155–199. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Paul, Waltraud. 2005. Adjectival modification in Mandarin Chinese and related issues. Linguistics 43(4). 757–793.Google Scholar

  • Paul, Waltraud. 2006. Zhu Dexi’s two classes of adjectives revisited. In Christoph Anderl & Halvor Eifring (eds.), Studies in Chinese language and culture. Festschrift in honour of Christoph Harbsmeier on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 303–315. Oslo: Hermes Academic Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Paul, Waltraud. 2010. Adjectives in Mandarin Chinese: The rehabilitation of a much ostracized category. In Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr & Ora Matushansky (eds.), Adjectives: Formal analysis in syntax and semantics, 115–151. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Pitt, David & Jerrold J. Katz. 2000. Compositional idioms. Language 76. 409–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Postal, Paul M. 1969. Anaphoric islands. In Robert Binnick, et al. (eds.), Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 209–239. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

  • Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [Revision of 1993 technical report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-537.].Google Scholar

  • Pullum, Geoffrey & Arnold Zwicky. 1991. A misconceived approach to morphology. In Dawn Bates (ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 387–398. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

  • Rainer, Franz & Soledad Varela. 1992. Compounding in Spanish. Rivista di Linguistica 4. 117–142.Google Scholar

  • Rice, Keren. 2000. Morpheme order and semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Riehemann, Suzanne Z. 1998. Type-based derivational morphology. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2. 49–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Riehemann, Suzanne Z. 2001. A constructional approach to idioms and word formation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Ross, John Robert. 1972. Doubl-ing. Linguistic Inquiry 3. 61–86.Google Scholar

  • Sadler, Louisa & Douglas J. Arnold. 1994. Prenominal adjectives and the phrasal/lexical distinction. Journal of Linguistics 30. 187–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sag, Ivan, Thomas Wasow & Emily M. Bender. 2003. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar

  • Schäfer, Martin. 2009. A+N constructions in Mandarin and the “compound vs. phrase” debate. Word Structure 2. 272–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schlücker, Barbara & Matthias Hüning. 2009. Compounds and phrases. A functional comparison between German A + N compounds and corresponding phrases. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 21(1). 209–234.Google Scholar

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Shen, Jiaxuan. 1997. Xingrongci jufa gongneng de biaoji moshi [The marking model of the syntactic functions of adjectives]. Zhongguo Yuwen 4. 242–250.Google Scholar

  • Shen, Jiaxuan. 1999. Buduicheng he biaojilun [Asymmetry and the markedness theory]. Jiangxi: Jiangxi Education Press.Google Scholar

  • Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological theory: An introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Sproat, Richard. 1993. Looking into words. In Sharon Hargus & Ellen Kaisse (eds.), Studies in lexical phonology, 173–195. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Sproat, Richard & Chilin Shih. 1988. Prenominal adjectival ordering in English and Mandarin. In James Blevins & Juli Carter (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 18, vol. 2, 465–489. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar

  • Sproat, Richard & Chilin Shih. 1991. The cross-linguistic distribution of adjective ordering restrictions. In Carol Georgopoulos & Roberta Ishihara (eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, 565–593. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Sproat, Richard & Chilin Shih. 1993. Why Mandarin morphology is not stratum-ordered. In Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992, 185–217. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Sproat, Richard & Chilin Shih. 1996. A corpus-based analysis of Mandarin nominal root compound. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5. 49–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tang, Ting-Chi. 1988. Guoyu xingrongci de chongdie guilü [Reduplication rules for adjectives in Mandarin Chinese]. In Ting-Chi Tang (eds.), Hanyu cifa jufa lunji [Studies on Chinese morphology and syntax], 29–57. Taipei: Student Book Company.Google Scholar

  • Ward, Gregory, Richard Sproat & Gail McKoon. 1991. A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 67. 439–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1945. Grammatical categories. Language 21. 1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Xiandai Hanyu Cidian [Modern Chinese Dictionary] (2000) The Linguistics Institute of the Chinese Social Sciences Academy (eds.). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar

  • Xing, Fuyi. 1997. “hen shu-nü” zhi lei shuofa yuyan wenhua beijing de sikao [Reflections on hen shu-nü from linguistic and cultural perspectives]. Yuyan yanjiu 2. 1–10.Google Scholar

  • Xu, Jianhua & Fuhua Liu. 1999. Danyin xingrongci dingyu de he-zhi xi-zhi yu yuxu wenti [Monosyllabic attributive adjectives and the problem of word order]. Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu 3. 97–106.Google Scholar

  • Xu, Zheng. 2006. On the formation of adjective-noun combinations in Mandarin Chinese. In Qian Gao (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-17), 463–482. Los Angeles: GSIL Publications.Google Scholar

  • Yip, Moira. 1998. Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 216–246. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar

  • Yu, Alan C. L. 2003. The morphology and phonology of infixation. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Yu, Alan C. L. 2007. A natural history of infixation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Zhang, Guoxian. 2000. Xiandai hanyu xingrongci de dianxing tezheng [The characteristics of adjectives in modern Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 5. 447–458.Google Scholar

  • Zhongguo Wenzi Gaige Weiyuanhui Yanjiu Tuiguang Chu [Chinese Language Reform Committee Research and Popularization Office]. 1959. Putonghua sanqian changyongci biao [3,000 commonly used words in Standard Chinese]. Beijing: Wenzi Gaige Chubanshe.Google Scholar

  • Zhu, Dexi. 1956. Xiandai hanyu xingrongci yanjiu [A study of modern Chinese adjectives]. Yuyan yanjiu 1. 83–112.Google Scholar

  • Zhu, Dexi. 1980. Xiandai hanyu yufa yanjiu [Research on modern Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar

  • Zwicky, Arnold M. 1969. Phonological constraints in syntactic descriptions. Papers in Linguistics 1. 411–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1986. The principle of phonology-free syntax: Introductory remarks. Working Papers in Linguistics 32. 63–91. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-12-23

Published in Print: 2018-01-26


Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 207–256, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0035.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in