Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.644
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.878

CiteScore 2017: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.418
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.386

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 56, Issue 3

Issues

The expectation mismatch effect in accentedness perception of Asian and Caucasian non-native speakers of English

Ksenia Gnevsheva
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics,Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-05-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0006

Abstract

Previous research on speech perception has found an effect of ethnicity, such that the same audio clip may be rated more accented when presented with an Asian face (Rubin, Donald L. 1992. Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33(4). 511–531. doi: 10.1007/bf00973770). However, most previous work has concentrated on Asian non-native English speakers, and Caucasian speakers remain under-explored. In this study, listeners carried out an accentedness rating task using stimuli from first language Korean, German, and English speakers in 3 conditions: audio only, video only, and audiovisual. Korean speakers received similar accentedness ratings regardless of condition, but German speakers were rated significantly less accented in the video condition and more accented in the audiovisual condition than the audio one. This result is explained as an expectation mismatch effect, whereby, when the listeners saw a Caucasian speaker they did not expect to hear a foreign accent, but if they actually heard one it was made more salient by their expectation to the contrary.

Keywords: Speech perception; sociophonetics; foreign accentedness; ethnicity; variation

References

  • Babel, Molly & Jamie Russell. 2015. Expectations and speech intelligibility. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 137(5). 2823–2833.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, C. Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1). 32–64. doi: CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. Sociolinguistics and perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6). 377–389. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drager, Katie. 2010. Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7). 473–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gnevsheva, Ksenia. 2015. Acoustic analysis in Accent of Non-Native English (ANNE) corpus. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(2). 256–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Han-Gyol, Yi, Rajka Smiljanic & Bharath Chandrasekaran. 2014. The neural processing of foreign-accented speech and its relationship to listener bias. Frontiers in human neuroscience 8. 1–12. doi: CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hay, Jennifer & Katie Drager. 2010. Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48(4). 865–892.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hay, Jennifer, Aaron Nolan & K. Katie Drager. 2006a. From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review 23(3). 351–379. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hay, Jennifer, Paul Warren & Katie Drager. 2006b. Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34(4). 458–484. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Keith Johnson & John W Mullennix eds., Talker variability in speech processing, 145–165. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Keith. 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34. 485–499. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kang, Okim & Donald L Rubin. 2009. Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28. 441–456.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kraut, Rachel & Stefanie Wulff. 2013. Foreign-accented speech perception ratings: A multifactorial case study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 34(3). 249–263. doi: .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Levi, Susannah V., Stephen J Winters & David B Pisoni. 2007. Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(4). 2327–2338.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Hoboken: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • McGowan, Kevin B. 2015. Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech. Advance online publication. doi: CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Niedzielski, Nancy. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1). 62–85. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2003. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46(2-3). 115–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]. 2012. Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com.

  • R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org/

  • Rubin, Donald L. 1992. Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33(4). 511–531. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strand, Elizabeth A. 2000. Gender stereotype effects on speech processing. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Vishnevskaya, Galina. 2008. Foreign accent: Phonetic and communicative hazards. In Ewa Waniek-Klimczak ed., Issues in accents of English, 235–251. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Yi, Ha-Gyol, Jasmine E.B. Phelps, Rajka Smiljanic & Bharath Chandrasekaran. 2013. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134(5). 387–393.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-05-23

Published in Print: 2018-06-26


Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 581–598, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0006.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in