Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Gast, Volker


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.066

CiteScore 2018: 0.97

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.384
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.409

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 56, Issue 5

Issues

Asymmetries of null subjects and null objects in L1-English and L1-Japanese learners’ Chinese

Hui Chang
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute of Cross-linguistic Processing and Cognition,Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Lina Zheng
Published Online: 2018-07-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0021

Abstract

Based on the HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus, this study investigated the use of Chinese null arguments by advanced adult L1-English and L1-Japanese learners with Chinese native speakers as a baseline. Several asymmetries were found. First, the learners produced many more null subjects than null objects. Second, null subjects were mainly animate, while null objects were mainly inanimate. Third, more null subjects were used in non-matrix clauses than in matrix clauses. In addition, L1 did not seem to play a significant role in the learners’ use of Chinese null arguments, and the learners’ use Chinese null arguments was generally not native-like. Finally, it appears that null objects are not transferable or developmental and that infrequent use of null objects is universal in L2. It was argued that positive evidence in the target input as well as the nature of the subject and the object led to the asymmetric use of null subjects and null objects in L2 Chinese.

Keywords: asymmetry; null subject; null object; L2 Chinese

References

  • Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan. 2010. Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bloom, Lois. 1970. Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Bloom, Paul. 1990. Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 21(4). 419–504.Google Scholar

  • Chi, Yang Qin. 2006. Acquisition of null arguments in Chinese as a second language. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

  • Clancy, Patricia. 1993. Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In Eve Clark (ed.), Proceedings of the 25th annual child language research forum, 307–314. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1989 [1981]. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William 2003 [1990]. Typology and universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dong, Yan Ping & Yu Hua Liu. 2006. Yinghanyu juzi lijie guochengzhong de xiansuo jingzheng [Word order and animacy as sentence processing cues for Chinese-English bilinguals]. Waiyu Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [Foreign language teaching and research] 38(3). 257–264.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, Rod. 1997. SLA research and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Greenfield Patricia, Marks & Joshua Smith 1976. The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Non-overt subjects in diary contexts. In Joan Mascaro & Marina Nespor (eds.), Grammar in progress, GLOW essays for Henk van Riemsdijk, 167–174. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Haegeman, Liliane. 1997. Register variation, truncation and subject omission in English and in French. English Language and Linguistics 1(2). 233–270.Google Scholar

  • Haegeman, Liliane. 2013. The syntax of registers: Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root. Lingua 130. 88–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haegeman, Liliane & Tabea Ihsane. 2001. Adult null subjects in the non-pro-drop languages: Two diary dialects. Language Acquisition 9(4). 329–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hasatani, Machiko. 1991. Nihongo no shugo to mokutekigo no shouryaku-gakushuusha no shuutoku katei [Acquisition of subjects and objects in Japanese-acquisition process of learners]. Nihongogaku [Japanese linguistics] 10(1). 65–74.Google Scholar

  • Hasegawa, Nobuko. 1985. On the so-called “zero pronouns” in Japanese. The Linguistic Review 4(4). 289–341.Google Scholar

  • Hirakawa, Makiko. 1993. Null subjects versus null objects in an early grammar of Japanese. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 9. 30–45.Google Scholar

  • Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 531–574.Google Scholar

  • Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

  • Hyams, Nina. 1986. Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

  • Hyams, Nina & Kenneth Wexler. 1993. On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 24(3). 421–459.Google Scholar

  • Ingham, Richard. 1993/1994. Input and learnability: Direct object omissibility in English. Language Acquisition 3(2): 95–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Kenneth Safir. (eds.). 1989. The null subject parameter. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Jin, Hong Gang. 1994. Topic-prominence and subject-prominence in L2 acquisition: Evidence of English-to-Chinese typological transfer. Language Learning 44(1). 101–122.Google Scholar

  • Kong, Stano. 2001. L1 Chinese speakers and asymmetry of null matrix and embedded subjects in their L2 English. Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics 3. 33–58.Google Scholar

  • Kong, Stano. 2005. The partial access of universal grammar in second language acquisition: An investigation of English subjects by L1 Chinese speakers. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14(3). 227–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kong, Stano. 2007. English speakers and the asymmetrical matrix-embedded null subjects in L2 Chinese. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 33(1). 23–52.Google Scholar

  • Li, N. Charles & Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Li, N. Charles & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Li, Ping, Elizabeth Bates & Brian MacWhinney. 1993. Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language 32(2). 169–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Li, Xiao Shi. 2014. Variation in subject pronominal expression in L2 Chinese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(1): 1–30.Google Scholar

  • MacWhinney, Brian, Elizabeth Bates & Reinhold Kliegl. 1984. Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23 (2). 127–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Massam, Diane & Yves Roverge. 1989. Recipe context null objects in English. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1). 134–139.Google Scholar

  • Meechanyakul, Naparat & Singhapreecha Pornsiri. 2013. The unlearning of null-arguments by Thai learners of English. In Foreign language learning and teaching 2013 conference proceedings by the language institute of Thammasat University, Thailand, 741–752.Google Scholar

  • Namtapi, Itsara & Nattama Pongpairoj. 2016. The acquisition of L2 English non-null arguments by L1 Thai learners. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 37 (3). 150–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, Hyeson. 2004. A minimalist approach to null subjects and objects in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 20(1). 1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Polio, Charlene. 1995. The use of zero pronouns by nonnative speakers of Chinese and the implication for the acquisition of nominal reference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17(3). 353–377.Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, Bonnie & Rex Sprouse. 1994. Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longtitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In Teun Hoekstra & Bonnie Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 317–368. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, Bonnie & Rex Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12(1). 40–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shi, Ding Xu. 1989. Topic chain as a syntactic category in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17(2). 223–259.Google Scholar

  • Shi, Ding Xu. 1992. The nature of topic comment constructions and topic chains. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Su, I. Ru. 2001. Transfer of sentence processing strategies: A comparison of L2 learners of Chinese and English. Applied Psycholinguistics 22(1). 83–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tsao, Feng Fu. 1977. A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step toward discourse analysis. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Valian, Virginia. 1991. Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40(1). 21–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wakabayashi, Shigenor & Rumiko Negishi. 2003. Asymmetry of Subjects and Objects in Japanese Speakers’ L2 English. Second Language 2(1). 53–57.Google Scholar

  • Wang, Qi, Diane Lillo-Martin, Catherine Best & Andrea Levitt. 1992. Null subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition 2(3). 221–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, Yue Hua & Shan Zhi Yu. 2012. Zhongguo xuesheng yingyu jufa zhong de lingzhuyu he lingbinyu yanjiu [Null subjects and null objects in L2 syntax by Chinese learners of English]. Xiandai Waiyu [Modern foreign languages] 35(1). 46–53.Google Scholar

  • Xu, Lie Jiong. 1986. Free empty category. Linguistic Inquiry 17(1). 75–93.Google Scholar

  • Yamada, Kazumi. 2009. Acquisition of zero pronouns in discourse by Korean and English learners of L2 Japanese. In Melissa Bowles, Tania Ionin, Silvina Montrul & Annie Tremblay (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th generative approaches to second language acquisition conference (GASLA 2009), 60–68. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

  • Yuan, Bo Ping. 1997. Asymmetry of null subjects and null objects in Chinese speakers’ L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(4). 467–497.Google Scholar

  • Zhao, Lucy Xia. 2012. Interpretation of Chinese overt and embedded null arguments by English-speaking learners. Second Language Research 28(2). 169–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zobl, Helmut. 1994. Prior linguistic knowledge and the conservation of the learning procedure: Grammaticality judgments of unilingual and multilingual learners. In Susan Gass & Larry Selinker (eds.), Language transfer in language learning, 176–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Zushi, Mihoko. 2003. Null arguments: The case of Japanese and Romance. Lingua 113(4-6). 559–604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-07-31

Published in Print: 2018-08-28


The research was supported by a General Research Fund from the Shanghai Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science (Grant No. 2016BYY004) and a Key Research Fund from the National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science (Grant No. 17AYY007).


Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 1141–1166, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0021.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in