Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff

1 Issue per year

Online
ISSN
2199-174X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Meaning change in a petri dish: constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts

Martin Hilpert / Florent Perek
Published Online: 2015-10-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2015-0013

Abstract

This paper explores how the visualization tool of motion charts can be used for the analysis of meaning change in linguistic constructions. In previous work, linguistic motion charts have been used to represent diachronic frequency trends and changes in the morphosyntactic behavior of linguistic units. The present paper builds on that work, but it shifts the focus to the study of semantic change. How can motion charts be used to visualize semantic change over time? In order to answer this question, we draw on semantic vector space modeling to visualize aspects of linguistic meaning. As an analogy to this approach, the title of this paper alludes to a petri dish in which the growth and development of biological microorganisms can be observed. On the basis of diachronic corpus data, we monitor developments in the semantic ecology of a construction. This allows us to observe processes such as semantic broadening, semantic narrowing, or semantic shift. We illustrate our approach on the basis of a case study that investigates the diachrony of an English construction that we call the ‘many a NOUN’ construction.

Keywords: corpus linguistics; semantic change; construction grammar; motion charts; semantic vector spaces

References

  • Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2011. The rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar approach. Lingua 121(1). 60–79.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg. 2011. Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in “a”-adjective production. Language 81(1). 1–29.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bullinaria, John & Joseph Levy. 2007. Extracting semantic representations from word cooccurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods 39(34). 510–526.Google Scholar

  • Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 450+ million words, 1990-present. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca (accessed June 2015).

  • Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400+ million words, 1810–2009. http://corpus.byu.edu/coha (accessed June 2015).

  • Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004a. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1). 97–129.Google Scholar

  • Heylen, Kris & Tom Ruette. 2013. Degrees of semantic control in measuring aggregated lexical distances. In L. Borin, A. Saxena & T. Rama (eds.), Approaches to measuring linguistic differences, 361–382. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Hilpert, Martin. 2011. Dynamic visualizations of language change: Motion charts on the basis of bivariate and multivariate data from diachronic corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(4). 435–461.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hilpert, Martin. 2012a. Die englischen Modalverben im Daumenkino: Zur dynamischen Visualisierung von Phänomenen des Sprachwandels. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 169. 67–82.Google Scholar

  • Hilpert, Martin. 2012b. Diachronic collostructional analysis meets the noun phrase. Studying many a noun in COHA. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 233–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. [Studies in English Language] Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Perek, Florent. 2014, to appear. Vector spaces for historical linguistics: Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland USA, June 23–25, 2014 (pp. 309–314). East Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.

  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Ruette, Tom, Dirk Speelman, and Dirk Geeraerts. 2013. Lexical variation in aggregate perspective. In Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Pluricentricity: linguistic variation and sociocognitive dimensions, 95–116. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Rosemeyer, Malte. 2014. Auxiliary selection in Spanish. Gradience, gradualness, and conservation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Sagi, Eyal, Stefan Kaufmann & Brady Clark. 2012. Tracing semantic change with latent semantic analysis. In Justyna Robynson and Kathryn Allan (eds.), Current methods in historical semantics, 161–183. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243.Google Scholar

  • Turney, Peter D. & Patrick Pantel. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37. 141–188.Google Scholar

  • Van der Maaten, Laurens & Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9. 2579–2605.Google Scholar

  • Visser, Frederikus Th. 1963. An historical syntax of the English Language. vol 1. Syntactical units with one verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-06-15

Accepted: 2015-09-21

Published Online: 2015-10-16

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Funding: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds (SNF) (Grant/Award Number: 100015_149176/1).


Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2015-0013.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in