Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff

1 Issue per year

Online
ISSN
2199-174X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Phonotactic c(l)ues to Bantu noun class disambiguation

Aaron Braver / Wm. G. Bennett
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of English Language and Linguistics, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, Eastern Cape, South Africa
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-12-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0062

Abstract

While a number of phonologists assume that phonotactics can provide clues to abstract morphological information, this possibility has largely gone unconsidered in work on Bantu noun classes. We present experimental evidence from isiXhosa (a Bantu language of the Nguni family, from South Africa), showing that speakers make use of root phonotactics when assigning noun classes to nonce words. Nouns in Xhosa bear class-indicating prefixes, but some of these prefixes are homophonous – and therefore ambiguous. Our findings show that when speakers are presented with words that have prefixes ambiguous between two classes, phonotactic factors can condition them to treat the nouns as one class or the other. This suggests that noun class (and other abstract morphological information) is not only stored in the lexicon, but is also redundantly indicated by phonotactic clues.

Keywords: phonotactics; noun class; NC; Xhosa; isiXhosa; Bantu

References

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1992. Noun classes in Arapesh. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991, 21–32. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Baumbach, E. J. M. 1987. Analytical Tsonga grammar. Pretoria: University of South Africa.Google Scholar

  • Bennett, Wm. G. 2014. Some differences between clicks and Labio-Velars. South African Journal of African Languages 34(2). 115–126.Google Scholar

  • Berko, J. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150–177.Google Scholar

  • Cole, D. T. 1955. Introduction to Tswana grammar. Cape Town: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Doke, C. M. 1927. Textbook of Zulu grammar. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman. (reprinted 1984, 6th edition).Google Scholar

  • Doke, C. M. 1954. The Southern Bantu Languages. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ernestus, Mirjam & Harald Baayen. 2003. Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79(1). 5–38.Google Scholar

  • Fortune, G. 1984. Shona grammatical constructions, vol. 1, 3rd edn. Harare: Mercury Press.Google Scholar

  • Gelbart, Ben. 2005. Perception of foreignness. University of Massachusetts PhD thesis, Amherst.

  • Halpert, Claire. 2012. Overlap-driven consequences of nasal place assimilation. In Philip Hoole, Lasse Bombien, Marianne Pouplier, Christine Mooshammer & Barbara Küuhnert (eds.), Consonant clusters and structural complexity, 345–368. Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Hayes, Bruce, Kie Zuraw, Péter Siptár & Zsuzsa Londe. 2009. Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language 85(4). 822–863.Google Scholar

  • Idiata, D. F. 2005. What Bantu child speech data tells us about the controversial semantics of Bantu Noun class system. Lincom.

  • Iosad, Pavel. 2010. Right at the left edge: Initial consonant mutations in the languages of the world. In J. Wohlgemuth & M. Cysouw (eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory, 105–138. Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Jessen, Michael & Justus C. Roux. 2002. Voice quality differences associated with stops and clicks in Xhosa. Journal of Phonetics 30. 1–52.Google Scholar

  • Jordan, A. C. 1966. A practical course in Xhosa. Cape Town: Longmans.Google Scholar

  • Katamba, F. 2003. Bantu nominal morphology. In Derek Nurse & Geraldine Philippson (eds.), The Bantu languages, 103–120. Routledge.

  • Kgolo, Naledi. 2014. The mental representation of Setswana Deverbative nouns: A psycholinguistic analysis of Class 1 and 9 nominalisations. University of Essex, PhD thesis.

  • Kgolo, Naledi & Sonja Eisenbeiss. 2015. The role of morphological structure in the processing of complex forms: Evidence from Setswana deverbative nouns. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(9). 1116–1133.Google Scholar

  • Kunju, Hleze. Forthcoming. IsiXhosa as a minority language in Zimbabwe. Rhodes University PhD thesis.

  • Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2016. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 19th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Online version, entry for Xhosa: http://www.ethnologue.com/language/xho (accessed 19 May 2016).Google Scholar

  • Mclaren, J. 1942. A Xhosa grammar, 2nd edn. Cape Town: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar

  • Moore-Cantwell, Claire. 2016. The phonological grammar is probabilistic: New evidence pitting abstract representation against analogy. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Meeting in Phonology.

  • Moreton, E. & S. Amano. 1999. Phonotactics in the perception of Japanese vowel length: Evidence for long-distance dependencies. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology.

  • Pahl, H. W. 1978. IsiXhosa. Halfway House, South Africa: Educum.Google Scholar

  • Sande, Hannah. 2016. An interface model of phonologically determined agreement. In Kyeong-min Kim et al. (ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 339–350. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  • Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 2010. The nanosyntax of Nguni noun class prefixes and concords. Lingua 120(6). 1522–1548.Google Scholar

  • Tshabe, S. L. et al. (eds.). 2006. The Greater Dictionary of IsiXhosa, vols 1–3, previously published in 1989, 2003. IsiXhosa National Lexicography Unit. Alice, South Africa: University of Fort Hare.Google Scholar

  • Tucker, G. R., W. E. Lambert & A. A. Rigault. 1977. The French speaker’s skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behaviour. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-12-13

Published in Print: 2016-12-01


Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the Rhodes University Research Council.


Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0062.

Export Citation

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in