Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff

1 Issue per year

Online
ISSN
2199-174X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The shrug as marker of obviousness

Corpus evidence from Dutch face-to-face conversations

Annelies Jehoul / Geert Brône / Kurt Feyaerts
Published Online: 2017-06-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0082

Abstract

This contribution focuses on the shrug as it is used in stance taking contexts in face-to-face conversations. The shrug qualifies as a ‘compound enactment’, in which prototypically different gestures are combined: “the eye-brows (which are being raised), the hands (which are turned so that the palms face up), the forearms (which may be lifted), and the shoulders (which are also raised). In addition, the head may be tilted” (Streeck 2009: 189. Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins). More recent studies show that instead of a head tilt, a headshake can also be a part of the shrug (Schoonjans 2014. Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. Leuven: KU Leuven dissertation). We report on an empirical study, in which the shrug or some of its gestural components are used to express obviousness on the part of the speaker. Although our data reveal multimodal patterns in the expression of obviousness, this study singles out the gestural dimension. The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 explains the methodological aspects of our study, after which Section 3 presents the formal and quantitative results, illustrated with four examples. The paper ends in Section 4 with a brief discussion of our major findings.

Keywords: shrug; obviousness; stance taking

References

  • Debras, Camille. 2013. Shrugging as stance-taking: Forms and functions of a compound enactment. [talk at the first MaMuD workshop, Aachen, 22-11-2013].Google Scholar

  • Debras, Camille & Alan Cienki. 2012. Some uses of head tilts and shoulder shrugs during human interaction, and their relation to stancetaking. 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing and 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust. 932–937.Google Scholar

  • DeCarlo, Doug, Matthew Stone, Corey Revilla & Jennifer J. Venditti. 2004. Specifying and animating facial signals for discourse in embodied conversational agents. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 15(1). 27–38.Google Scholar

  • Du Bois, John. W. 2007. The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (eds.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Ferré, Gaëlle. 2011. Functions of three open-palm hand gestures. Multimodal Communication 1(1). 5–20.Google Scholar

  • Feyaerts, Kurt, Ilona Papousek, Helmut K. Lackner, Gabriele Gierlinger & Bert Oben (2012). AliLeGra Corpus. Alignment Leuven Graz. Dept. of Linguistics, KU Leuven.Google Scholar

  • Flecha-García, María. L. 2010. Eyebrow raises in dialogue and their relation to discourse structure, utterance function and pitch accents in English. Speech Communication 52. 542–554.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jehoul, Annelies. 2014. Multimodale uitdrukkingen van vanzelfsprekendheid. Een empirische corpusstudie. Master thesis. Dept. of Linguistics, KU Leuven.Google Scholar

  • Jehoul, Annelies & Kurt Feyaerts. In press. Multimodale uitdrukkignen van vanzelfsprekendheid. Een empirische corpusstudie. Nederlandse Taalkunde.Google Scholar

  • Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Kendon, Adam. 2002. Some uses of the head shake. Gesture 2. 147–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mangelschots, Katinka, Annelies Jehoul, Kurt Feyaerts & Steven Schoonjans. Submitted. Multimodal marking of obviousness in German and Dutch: A contrastive study. Cognitextes.Google Scholar

  • Müller, Cornelia. 2004. Forms of the uses of the palm up open hand. A case of a gesture family? In Posner R. & Müller C. (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, 234–256. Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar

  • Schoonjans, Steven. 2014. Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen Dissertation. Dept. of Linguistics, KU Leuven.Google Scholar

  • Schoonjans, Steven, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts. 2015. Multimodalität in der Konstruktionsgrammatik: Eine kritische Betrachtung illustriert anhand einer Gestikanalyse der Partikel einfach. In Bücker Jörg, Günthner Susanne & Imo Wolfgang (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V: Konstruktionen im Spannungsfeld von sequenziellen Mustern, kommunikativen Gattungen und Textsorten, 291–308. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar

  • Streeck, Jürgen. 2009. Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-09-26

Accepted: 2016-11-07

Published Online: 2017-06-29


Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, Volume 3, Issue s1, 20160082, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0082.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Kensy Cooperrider, Natasha Abner, and Susan Goldin-Meadow
Frontiers in Communication, 2018, Volume 3

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in