Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff

1 Issue per year

Online
ISSN
2199-174X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Timelines and multimodal constructions: Facing new challenges

Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas / Javier Valenzuela
  • Filología Inglesa, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de la Merced Plaza de la Universidad Murcia, Murcia 30071, Spain
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-06-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0087

Abstract

There is little doubt that spatial information underlies a great deal of our processing of temporal information. Research on the ways in which timelines are associated with specific grammatical constructions has just started, and has brought forward new challenges for construction grammar. A true multimodal construction grammar cannot be developed using the same tools and mechanisms applied so far, but will require instead a fresh approach and a careful rethinking of the whole communicative process. It is our belief than in this transition from a narrow conception of linguistic communication to a broader and more complete view of communication “in the wild”, multimodal construction grammar will play an important role.

Keywords: time; blending; gesture; multimodality; mental imagery

References

  • Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1). 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boroditsky, L. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43(1). 1–22.Google Scholar

  • Boroditsky, L., O. Fuhrman & K. McCormick. 2011. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition 118(1). 123–129.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boroditsky, L. & M. Ramscar. 2002. The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13(2). 185–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bottini, R. & D. Casasanto. 2010. Implicit spatial length modulates time estimates, but not vice versa. Spatial Cognition VII. 152–162.Google Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. 2000. Research design and issues of validity. In H. T. Reis & C. T. Judd (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 3–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Casasanto, D. & L. Boroditsky. 2008. Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 106. 579–593.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Casasanto, D. & K. Jasmin. 2012. The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4). 643–674.Google Scholar

  • Coulson, S. & C. Pagán Cánovas. 2013. Understanding timelines. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 5(1–2). 198–219.Google Scholar

  • Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fauconnier, G. 2009. Generalized integration networks. In V. Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 147–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 57–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fuhrman, O., K. McCormick, E. Chen, H. Jiang, D. Shu, S. Mao & L. Boroditsky. 2011. How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science 35. 1305–1328.Google Scholar

  • Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7. 155–170.Google Scholar

  • Guyau, J. M. 1988 [1890]. The origin of the idea of time. Reprinted In J. A. Michon, V. Pouthas & J. L Jackson ((ed.)), Guyau and the idea of time. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

  • Hutchins, E. 2005. Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10). 1555–1577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, G. & M. Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • McNeill David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Núñez, R. & K. Cooperrider. 2013. The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(5). 220–229.Google Scholar

  • Núñez, R. E. & E. Sweetser. 2006. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30(3). 401–450.Google Scholar

  • Pagán Cánovas, C. 2010. Erotic emissions in Greek poetry: A Generic Integration Network. Cognitive Semiotics 6. 7–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pagán Cánovas, C. & M. F. Jensen. 2013. Anchoring time-space mappings and their emotions: The timeline blend in poetic metaphors. Language and Literature 22(1). 45–59.Google Scholar

  • Pagán Cánovas, C. & A. Piata. Forthcoming. The way time goes by: Conceptual integration and the poetics of time. In S. Csábi (ed.), New directions in cognition and poetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pagán Cánovas, C. & M. Turner. 2016. Generic integration templates for fictive communication. In E. Pascual & S. Sandler (eds.), The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction, 45–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Pagán Cánovas, C., J. Valenzuela & J. Santiago. 2015. Like the machete the snake: Integration of topic and vehicle in poetry comprehension reveals meaning construction processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9(4). 385–393.Google Scholar

  • Rosenberg, D. & A. Grafton. 2010. Cartographies of time: A history of the timeline. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar

  • Santiago, J., J. Lupiáñez, E. Pérez & M. J. Funes. 2007. Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14. 512–516.Google Scholar

  • Santiago, J., A. Román & M. Ouellet. 2011. Flexible foundations of abstract thought: A review and a theory. Spatial Dimensions of Social Thought 41–110.Google Scholar

  • Santiago, J., A. Román, M. Ouellet, N. Rodríguez & P. Pérez-Azor. 2010. In hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research PRPF 74(1). 59–70.Google Scholar

  • Teuscher, U., M. McQuire, J. Collins & S. Coulson. 2008. Congruity effects in time and space: Behavioral and ERP measures. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 32(3). 563–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Torralbo, A., J. Santiago & J. Lupiáñez. 2006. Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science 30(4). 745–757.Google Scholar

  • Turner, M. 2014. The origin of ideas: Blending, creativity, and the human spark. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tversky, B., S. Kugelmass & A. Winter. 1991. Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology 23. 515–557.Google Scholar

  • Ulrich, R. & C. Maienborn. 2010. Left–right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition 117(2). 126–138.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Valenzuela, J., C. Pagán Cánovas & I. Olza In review. Gesturing the timeline: Gestures co-occurring with temporal demarcative expressions provide evidence for anchoring and viewpoint integration.Google Scholar

  • Walker, E. & K. Cooperrider. 2016. The continuity of metaphor: Evidence from temporal gestures. Cognitive Science 40(2). 481–495Google Scholar

  • Weger, U. W. & J. Pratt. 2008. Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15(2). 426–430.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, M. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9. 625–636.Google Scholar

  • Zhang, J. & V. L. Patel. 2006. Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance. Pragmatics & Cognition 14(2). 333–341.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-10-13

Accepted: 2016-10-19

Published Online: 2017-06-29


Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, Volume 3, Issue s1, 20160087, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0087.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in