Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff


CiteScore 2018: 0.95

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.381
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.841

Online
ISSN
2199-174X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Antonym adjective pairs and prosodic iconicity: evidence from letter replications in an English blogger corpus

Susanne FuchsORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6751-9286 / Egor SavinORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4209-1003 / Stephanie SoltORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-8461 / Cornelia EbertORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4833-8655 / Manfred KrifkaORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9610-8352
Published Online: 2019-01-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0017

Abstract

While the general assumption has long been that natural languages exhibit an arbitrary pairing of form and meaning, there is increasing empirical evidence that iconicity in language is not uncommon. One example from spoken language involves iconic prosodic modulation, i.e. the changing of prosodic features such as duration and fundamental frequency to express meanings such as size and speed. In this paper, we use data from an English social media corpus, with 140 million words written by 19,320 bloggers, to investigate a counterpart to iconic prosodic modulation in written language, namely letter replications (e.g. loooong). We examine pairs of gradable adjectives such as short/long, tiny/huge and fast/slow, finding a higher frequency of letter replications for adjectives associated with greater size or spatial/temporal extent. We did not find an iconic effect on the number of replicated letters. Our results show evidence for iconic prosody in written language, and further demonstrate that social media databases offer an excellent opportunity to investigate naturalistic written language.

Keywords: iconic lengthening; prosody; social media; English; scalarity

References

  • Aristodemo, Valentina & Carlo Geraci. 2018. Visible degrees in Italian sign language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36(3). 685–699.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bierwisch, Manfred. 1987. Dimensionsadjektive als strukturierender Ausschnitt des Sprachverhaltens. In Manfred Bierwisch & Ewald Lang (eds.), Grammatische und konzeptuelle Aspekte von Dimensionsadjektiven, 1–90. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Blasi, Damián E., Søren Wichmann, Harald Hammarström, Peter F. Stadler & Morten H. Christiansen. 2016. Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(39). 10818–10823.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brody, Samuel & Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2011. Cooooooooooooooollllllllllllll!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Using word lengthening to detect sentiment in microblogs. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Edinburgh, UK. 562–570.Google Scholar

  • Cuskley, Christine & Simon Kirby. 2013. Synesthesia, cross-modality and language evolution. In Julia Simner & Edward Hubbard (eds.), Oxford handbook of synesthesia, 869–907. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990–present. Available online at https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/. (accessed 5 January 2018).

  • Fuchs, Susanne, Egor Savin, Uwe D. Reichel, Cornelia Ebert & Manfred Krifka. 2018. Letter replication as prosodic amplification in social media. In Malte Belz, Susanne Fuchs, Stefanie Jannedy, Christine Mooshammer, Oksana Rasskazova & Marzena Zygis (eds.), Proceedings of the conference on phonetics and phonology in the German-speaking countries, 65–68. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Diane Brentari. 2017. Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Cambridge Core in Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40. e46.Google Scholar

  • Hockett, Charles S. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203. 88–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huang, Yuan, Diansheng Guo, Alice Kasakoff & Jack Grieve. 2016. Understanding U.S. regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 59. 244–255.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kawahara, Shigeto & Aaron Braver 2014. Durational properties of emphatically lengthened consonants in Japanese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44(3). 237–260.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kaye, Linda K., Stephanie A. Malone & Helen J. Wall. 2017. Emojis: Insights, affordances, and possibilities for psychological science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21(2). 66–68.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kendon, Adam. 1980. Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Mary Ritchie Key (ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication 207–227. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Knoeferle, Klemens, Jixing Li, Emanuela Maggioni & Charles Spence. 2017. What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings. Scientific Reports 7. 5562.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Köhler, Wolfgang. 1929. Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar

  • Kuhn, Jeremy. 2017. Telicity and iconic scales in ASL. https://www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/Tc2ZmRiO/ (accessed 1 October 2018).

  • Maurer, Daphne, Thanujeni Pathman & Catherine J. Mondloch. 2006. The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults.Developmental Science 9(3). 316–322.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Morton, Eugene S. 1977. On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. American Naturalist 111. 855–869.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nygaard, Lynne C., Debora S. Herold & Laura L. Namy. 2009. The semantics of prosody: Acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning. Cognitive Science 33(1). 127–146.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Ohala, John J. 1984. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 in voice. Phonetica 41. 1–16.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Ohala, John J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ohala, John J. 1997. Sound symbolism. Proceedings of the 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics. 98–103.Google Scholar

  • Perlman, Marcus. 2010. Talking fast: The use of speech rate as iconic gesture. In Fey Parrill, Vera Tobin & Mark Turner (eds.),Meaning, form, and body, 245–262. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

  • Perlman, Marcus, Nathaniel Clark & Marlene Johansson Falck. 2015. Iconic prosody in story reading. Cognitive Science 39(6). 1348–1368.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Perniss, Pamela & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2014. The bridge of iconicity: from a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369. 20130300.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.4.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Computer program obtained from https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed June 30, 2017).

  • Ramachandran, Vilayanur S. & Edward M. Hubbard. 2001. Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(12). 3–34.Google Scholar

  • Schler, Jonathan, Moshe Koppel, Shlomo Argamon & James Pennebaker. 2006. Effects of age and gender on blogging. Proceedings of 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches for Analyzing Weblogs, Stanford University, CA, USA. 1–7.Google Scholar

  • Schlenker, Philippe. 2017. Gestural grammar. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003497 (accessed October 1, 2018).

  • Schlenker, Philippe. 2018. Iconic pragmatics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36(3). 877–936.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schlenker, Philippe, Jonathan Lamberton & Mirko Santoro. 2013. Iconic variables. Linguistics & Philosophy 36(2). 91–149.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Shinohara, Kazuko & Shigeto Kawahara. 2010. A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The images of size. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 36. 396–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shintel, Hadas & Howard C. Nusbaum. 2008. Moving to the speed of sound: Context modulation of the effect of acoustic properties of speech. Cognitive Science 32(6). 1063–1074.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Shintel, Hadas, Howard C. Nusbaum & Arika Okrent. 2006. Analog acoustic expression in speech communication. Journal of Memory and Language 55(2). 167–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shintel, Hadas, Nathan L. Anderson & Kimberly M. Fenn. 2014. Talk this way: The effect of prosodically conveyed semantic information on memory for novel words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(4). 1437–1442.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2008. Complex predicates involving events, time and aspect: is this why sign languages look so similar? In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Theoretical issues in sign language research, 217–250. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar

  • Wilbur, Ronnie B., Evie Malaia & Robin A. Shay. 2012. Degree modification and intensification in American Sign Language adjectives. In Maria Aloni, Vladim Kimmelman, Floris Roelofsen, Galit W. Sassoon, Katrin Schulz & Matthijs Westera (eds.), Logic, language and meaning, 92–101. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Yorkston, Eric & Geeta Menon. 2004. A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgements. Journal of Consumer Research 31. 43–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-03-28

Accepted: 2018-07-18

Published Online: 2019-01-11


Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, Volume 5, Issue 1, 20180017, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0017.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in