Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff


CiteScore 2018: 0.95

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.381
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.841

Online
ISSN
2199-174X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes to British accents in enhancing the persuasiveness of children’s oral health campaigns

Zoe Adams
Published Online: 2019-04-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0008

Abstract

This paper seeks to improve the persuasiveness of oral health campaigns by investigating the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes to British accents. Forty-seven participants from Tayside, East Scotland, first completed an implicit task which asked participants to judge the truth value of 120 trivia statements, divided into six different accents, as quickly as possible. This was complimented by an identical written task at the end of the experiment in less pressurised conditions. Both audio and written responses to the statements were analysed using signal detection theory, which revealed that Estuary English was more persuasive than the local accent, Dundee English (p = 0.039), and the stigmatised multi-ethnolect, Multicultural London English (p = 0.002). Participants also completed an explicit task involving two matched-guise tests with the same six accents in a neutral and dental context. Results update our knowledge of explicit attitudes to British accents in a modern linguistic landscape, and shed light on correlations between implicit and explicit attitudes. Using Bassili and Brown’s (2005) Potentiated Recruitment Framework, it is argued that the relationship is mediated by participants’ self-presentation concerns and the perceived social penalties of expressing bias. Sociolinguistic implications of implicit measurement procedures are discussed regarding the development of oral health campaigns.

Keywords: implicitness; persuasion; attitudinal consistency; Potentiated Recruitment Framework; children’s oral health

References

  • Abdi, Hervé. 2007. Signal detection theory. In Neil Salkind (ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics, 1–9. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Altendorf, Ulrike. 2003. Estuary English: Levelling at the interface of RP and south-eastern British English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Alvarez-Mosquera, Pedro & Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez. 2017. Implicit language attitudes toward historically white accents in the South African context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 37(2). 1–11.Google Scholar

  • Bargh, John A. 1994. The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency and control in social cognition. In Robert S. Wyer Jr & Thomas K. Skrull (eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes, 1–40. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Bassili, John & Richard Brown. 2005. Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory. In Dolores Albarracín, Blair T. Johnson. & Mark P. Zanna (eds.), The handbook of attitudes, 543–574. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48.Google Scholar

  • Berlo, David K., James B. Lemert & Robert J. Mertz. 1969. Dimensions of evaluating acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly 33(4). 563–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenhausen, Gawronski, Andrew Todd & Jennifer A. Richeson. 2009. Controlling prejudice and stereotyping: Antecedents, mechanisms and contexts. In Todd Nelson (ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination, 111–130. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2012. The implicit association test and sociolinguistic meaning. Lingua 122(7). 753–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox & Eivind Torgersen. 2008. Ethnicity, friendship network and social practices as the motor of dialect change: Linguistic innovation in London. Sociolinguistica 22. 1–23.Google Scholar

  • Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox & Eivind Torgersen. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15. 151–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coupland, Nikolas & Hywel Bishop. 2007. Ideologised values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(1). 74–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, Jan, Niclas Heider, Adriaan Spruyt, Arne Roets & Sean Hughes. 2015. The relational responding task: Toward a new implicit measure. Frontiers in Psychology 6(319). 1–9.Google Scholar

  • Fabricus, Anne. 2006. The ‘vivid sociolinguistic profiling’ of Received Pronunciation: Responses to gendered dialect-in-discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(1). 111–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garrett, Peter, Nikolas Coupland & Angie Williams. 2003. Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity and performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15(3). 411–414.Google Scholar

  • Giles, Howard. 1971. Patterns of evaluation to R.P., South Welsh and Somerset accented speech. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 10(3). 280–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gimson, Alfred C. 1970. An introduction to the pronunciation of English, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Greenwald, Anthony, Debbie E. McGhee & Jordan Schwartz. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6). 1464–1480.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Heeger, David. 2003. Signal detection theory. http://www.cns.nyu.edu/ david/handouts/sdt/sdt.html (Accessed 1st February 2018).

  • Hiraga, Yuko. 2005. British attitudes towards six varieties of English in the USA and Britain. World Englishes 24(3). 289–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kerswill, Paul. 2007. Standard and non-standard English. In David Britain (ed.), Language in the British Isles, 34–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kerswill, Paul. 2014. The objectification of ‘Jafaican’. The discoural embedding of Multicultural London English in the British media. In Jannis Androutsopoulos (ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Kinzler, Katherine, Kristin Shutts & Joshua J. Correll. 2010. Priorities in social categories. European Journal of Social Psychology 40(4). 581–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lalwani, Ashok, May Lwin & Kuah Leng Li. 2008. Consumer responses to English accent variations in advertising. Journal of Global Marketing 18(3–4). 143–165.Google Scholar

  • Lambert, Wallace, Robert Hodgson, Robert Gardner & Steven Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 80(1). 44–51.Google Scholar

  • Lev-Ari, Shiri & Boaz Keysar. 2010. Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46. 1093–1096.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mai, Robert & Stefan Hoffmann. 2011. Four positive effects of a salesperson’s regional dialect in services selling. Journal of Service Research 14(4). 460–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, Ron. 1988. The political economy of Britain’s North-South Divide. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 13(4). 389–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCready, Richard B. 2008. Irish Catholicism and nationalism in Scotland: The Dundee experience, 1850–1922. Irish Studies Review 6(3). 245–252.Google Scholar

  • McKenzie, Robert & Erin Carrie. 2018. Implicit-explicit attitudinal discrepancy and the investigation of language attitude change in progress. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39(9). 830–844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Montgomery, Chris. 2012. The effect of proximity in perceptual dialectology. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(5). 638–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mugglestone, Linda. 1997. Talking proper: The rise of accent as a social symbol. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Myles, John F. 2010. Bourdieu, language and the media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Pantos, Andrew J. & Andrew W. Perkins. 2012. Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32(1). 3–20.Google Scholar

  • Parsons, Gudrun. 1998. From “RP” to “Estuary English”: The concept ‘received’ and the debate about British pronunciation standards. Unpublished MA thesis, Hamburg University. https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/estuary/parsons_ma.pdf.

  • Perloff, Richard. 2010. The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Petty, Richard E. & John Cacioppo. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19. 123–205.Google Scholar

  • Pichler, Heike. 2016. Uncovering discourse-pragmatic innovations: innit in Multicultural London English. In Heike Pichler (ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights, 59–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pine, Cynthia M, Pauline M. Adair, Alison D. Nicoll, Girvan Burnside, Poul E. Petersen, David Beighton, Angela Gillett, Ruth Anderson, Shahid Anwar, Susan Brailsford, Zdenek Broukal, Ivor G Chestnutt, Dominique Declerck, Feng X. Ping, Roberto Ferro, Ruth Freeman, Tshepo Gugushe, Rebecca Harris, Brent Lin, Edward C. M. Lo, Gerardo Maupome, Mohamed H. Moola, Sudeshni Naidoo, Francisco Ramos-Gomez, Lakshman P. Samaranayake, Swarngit Shahid, Marit S. Skeie, Christian Splieth, Betty King Sutton, Teo C. Soo & Helen Whelton. 2004a. International comparisons of health inequalities in childhood dental caries. Community Dental Health 21(1). 121–130.Google Scholar

  • Pine, Cynthia M, Pauline M. Adair, Poul E. Petersen, Chester Douglass, Girvan Burnside, Alison D. Nicoll, Angela Gillett, Ruth Anderson, David Beighton, Bian Jin-you, Zdenek Broukal, John P. Brown, Ivor G Chestnutt, Dominique Declerck, Deidre Devine, Ivar Espelid, Guiliano Falcolini, Feng Xi Ping, Ruth Freeman, David Gibbons, Tschepo Gugusge, Rebecca Harris, Jennifer Kirkham, Edward C. M. Lo, Philip Marsh, Gerardo Maupomé, Sudeshni Naidoo, Francisco Ramos-Gomez, Betty King Sutton & Sonia Williams. 2004b. Developing explanatory models of health inequalities in childhood dental caries. Community Dental Health 21(1). 86–95.Google Scholar

  • Pine, Cynthia, Pauline Adair, Louise Robinson, Girvan Burnside, Paula Moynihan, William Wade, James Kistler, Morag Curnow & Mary Henderson. 2016. The BBaRTS Healthy Teeth Behaviour Change Programme for preventing dental caries in primary school children: Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 17(103). 1–10.Google Scholar

  • Reinares-Lara Eva, Josefa D. Martín-Santana & Clara Muela-Molina. 2016. The effect of accent, differentiation and stigmatization on spokersperson credibility in radio advertising. Journal of Global Marketing 29(1). 15–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, Milton. 1968. Hedonism, inauthenticity and other goads toward expansion of a consistency theory. In Robert P. Abelson, Elliot Aronson, William J. McGuire, Theodore M. Newcomb, Milton J. Rosenberg, & Percy H. Tannenbaum (eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook, 73–111. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Laura, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts. 2015. Can social psychological attitude measures be used to study language attitudes? A case study exploring the Personalized Implicit Association Test. Paper presented at 6th Conference on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics, Tubingen, 4–6 November.Google Scholar

  • Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland. 1986. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Eliot R. 1996. What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(5). 893–912.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, Hayley-Jane & Lance Workman. 2008. The effect of accent on perceived intelligence and attractiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, Dublin, April 2008.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter. 2001. Received Pronunciation: Sociolinguistic aspects. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 36. 3–13.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter & Jean Hannah. 2017. A guide to varieties of English around the world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Unkelbach, Christian. 2007. Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology 33(1). 219–30.Google Scholar

  • Wells, John. C. 1997. What is Estuary English? English teaching professional 3. 46–47. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/estuary/whatis.htm.

  • Wentura, Dirk & Juliane Degner. 2010. A practical guide to sequential priming and related tasks. In Bertram Gawronski & Keith Payne (eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications, 95–116. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

  • Wittenbrink, Bernd, Charles M. Judd & Bernadette Park. 2001. Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(5). 815–827.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wotschke, Ingrid. 2014. How educated English speak English: Pronunciation as social behaviour. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-03-06

Accepted: 2018-12-03

Published Online: 2019-04-18


Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, Volume 5, Issue s1, 20180008, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0008.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in