Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff


CiteScore 2018: 0.95

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.381
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.841

Online
ISSN
2199-174X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Accounting for forgetfulness in dementia interaction

Jan Svennevig
  • Corresponding author
  • MultiLing – Center for MultiLingualism in Society across the Lifespan, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Anne Marie Dalby Landmark
  • MultiLing – Center for MultiLingualism in Society across the Lifespan, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-06-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0021

Abstract

The article identifies and describes conversational practices used by persons with dementia and their interlocutors to account for the former’s lack of knowledge in cases where information about their personal experiences is made relevant and expectable at a specific point in a conversation. First, they may seek to normalize the lack of knowledge by claiming that it would be difficult for anyone to know or remember the information in question. Second, they may exceptionalize it by claiming that their cognitive or communicative impairment incidentally and temporarily disables them from accessing the information. Finally, they may justify their failure to provide information by claiming that it is not important, relevant or expectable that they should know. Such accounts dissociate the social character from the forgetfulness and thus constitute an attempt to avoid the loss of face associated with not remembering personal experiences. By specifying these conversational accounting practices, the study thus adds to existing knowledge on how participants handle the social sensitivity of typical dementia symptoms.

Keywords: dementia; Conversation Analysis; accounts; forgetfulness; negative epistemics

References

  • Deppermann, Arnulf. 2011. Constructions vs. lexical items as sources of complex meanings: a comparative study of constructions with German “verstehen”. In Peter Auer, Gesa von Essen, Werner Frick (eds.), Linguae & Litterae, 88–126. Freiburg: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

  • Goodwin, Charles. 1987. Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly. 115–130.Google Scholar

  • Goodwin, Marjorie H. & Charles Goodwin. 1986. Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62. 51–76.Google Scholar

  • Guendozi, Jackie, & Anna Pate. 2014. Interactional and cognitive resources in dementia: A perspective from Politeness Theory. In Robert W. Schrauf and Nicole Müller (eds.), Dialogue and dementia. Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Hamilton, Heidi E. 1994. Conversations with an Alzheimer’s patient: An interactional sociolinguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 1984a. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 1984b. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 1988. Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In Charles Antaki (ed.),Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods, 127–144. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 1998. Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27. 291–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 2011 Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45. 1–29.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hutchby, Ian. 2002. Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: Aspects of the utterance “I don’t know”. Discourse Studies 4. 147–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keevallik, Leelo. 2011. The terms of not knowing. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Keevallik, Leelo. 2016. Abandoning dead ends: The Estonian junction marker maitea ‘I don’t know’. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 115–128.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo. 2016. Disclaiming epistemic access with ‘know’ and ‘remember’ in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 80–96.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lind, Marianne, Hanne G. Simonsen, Ingeborg S. Ribu, Bente A. Svendsen, Jan Svennevig & Kees de Bot. 2018. Lexical access in a bilingual speaker with dementia: Changes over time. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 32. 353–377.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindström, Jan, Yael Maschler & Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2016. A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 72–79.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muntigl, Peter & Kwok Tim Choi. 2010. Not remembering as a practical epistemic resource in couples therapy. Discourse Studies 12. 331–356.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nilsson, Elin. 2017. Fishing for answers: Couples living with dementia managing trouble with recollection. Educational Gerontology 43. 73–88.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2016. More than an epistemic hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as a resource for the sequential organization of turns and actions. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 148–162.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. Telling my side:“Limited access’ as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry 50. 186–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raymond, Geoffrey & John Heritage. 2006. The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35. 677–705.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2016. Accountability in social interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sacks, Harvey. 1984. On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: studies in conversational analysis, 413–429. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., & Harvey Sacks. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 8. 289–327.Google Scholar

  • Scott, Marvin B. & Stanford M. Lyman. 1968. Accounts. American Sociological Review 33. 46–62.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sidnell, Jack & Tanya Stivers. 2013. The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Stickle, Trini. 2015. Epistemic stance markers and the function of I don’t know in the talk of persons with dementia and children with autism. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, ProQuest.Google Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.). 2011. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Svennevig, Jan. 2013. Reformulation of questions with candidate answers. International Journal of Bilingualism 17. 189–204.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Tao, Hongyin. 2016. Disputed memory and the social interactive functions of remembering/forgetting expressions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 184–202.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Underwood, Kate. 2010. Interactive remembering: Insights into the communicative competence of older adults. Journal of Aging Studies 24. 145–166.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weatherall, Ann. 2011. I don’t know as a prepositioned epistemic hedge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 44. 317–337.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-07

Accepted: 2018-12-13

Published Online: 2019-06-22


Funding Source: Norges Forskningsråd

Award identifier / Grant number: 223265

The authors are grateful to Maria Vonen for help with transcription and collection building. We have also profited from comments on the paper from Marianne Lind, Elin Nilsson, Heidi Hamilton and other members of the Dementia, Language, Interaction, and Cognition Network. This work was partly supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centers of Excellence funding scheme, Norges Forskningsråd, Funder Id: 10.13039/501100005416, project number 223265.


Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, Volume 5, Issue s2, 20180021, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0021.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in