Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff


CiteScore 2018: 0.95

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.381
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.841

Online
ISSN
2199-174X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

[In]stability in the use of a stable variable

Johanna Mechler / Isabelle Buchstaller
Published Online: 2019-06-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0024

Abstract

The relationship between community-wide change and patterns of variation and change within the individual is one of the cornerstones of variationist theorising. But while sociolinguistic theory makes clear and testable predictions regarding the use of stable vernacular features across the life-span of the individual, we lack real-time evidence on the age-graded nature of stable variability. Indeed, whereas apparent time research highlights the diachronic stability of (ing), only two research projects have explored its use within the individual speaker. Both report on pre-adult speakers. Our research expands the window of analysis by adding a later age-bracket to the investigation of age-graded variability. We consider the variable realisation of (ing) in a group of individuals between early adulthood and retirement.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Keywords: change across the life-span; age-grading; panel studies; early adulthood

References

  • Arnett, Jeffrey. 2012. Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

  • Baayen, Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2014. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 1–48.Google Scholar

  • Baugh, John. 1996. Dimensions of a theory of econolinguistics. In Gregory Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin & John Baugh (eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov, Volume 1: Variation and change in language and society, 397–419. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Bell, Allan. 2000. Maori and pakeha english: a case study. In Allan Bell & Koenraad Kuiper (eds.), Varieties of English around the world: New Zealand English, 221–248. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Bordieu, Pierre & Luc Boltanski. 1975. Le fétichisme de la langue. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 4. 2–32.Google Scholar

  • Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatajana Nikitina and R. Harold Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Gerlog Bouma, Irene Kraemer and Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar

  • Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006. Diagnostics of age graded linguistic behavior. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10( 1). 3–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2016. Investigating the effect of socio-cognitive salience and speaker-based factors in morpho-syntactic life-span change. Journal of English Linguistics 44( 2). 199–229.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buchstaller, Isabelle, Anne Krause, Anja Auer & Stefanie Otte. 2017. Levelling across the life-span?: Tracing the FACE vowel in panel data from the North East of England. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21( 1). 3–33.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2008. I’ll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37(5). 637–659.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Chambers, Jack K. 2008 [1995]. Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Diessel, Holger & Michael Tomasello. 2005. Particle placement in early child language: A multifactorial analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1). 89–112.Google Scholar

  • Downes, William. 1998. Language and society 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Eckert, Penelope. 2005. Variation, convention, and social meaning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Oakland, CA. 1–33.Google Scholar

  • Gries, Stefan. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Hazen, Kirk. 2006. IN/ING variable. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn., vol. 5. 581–584. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change: Volume 2: Social factors. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William, Sharon Ash, Maya Ravindranath, Tracey Weldon, Maciej Baranowski & Naomi Nagy. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4). 431–463.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Levon, Erez & Sue Fox. 2014. Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ING and TH-fronting in Britain. Journal of English Linguistics 42(3). 185–217.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Levon, Erez & Isabelle Buchstaller. 2016. Toward an integrated model of sociolinguistic perception. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistic Symposium 21, University of Murcia.Google Scholar

  • Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do Linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • MacKenzie, Laurel. 2017. Frequency effects over the lifespan: A case study of Attenborough’s r’s. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1). 1–12. doi:10.1515/lingvan-2017-0005.Google Scholar

  • Mangiafico, Salvatore S. 2016. Summary and analysis of extension program evaluation in R, version 1.13.6. rcompanion.org/handbook/. (20 August, 2018.)Google Scholar

  • Meyerhoff, Miriam & Erik Schleef. 2012. Variation, contact and social indexicality in the acquisition of (ing) by teenage migrants. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(3). 398–416.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petré, Peter & Hans van de Velde. 2018. The real-time dynamics of individual and community in grammaticalization, Language. 94(4). 867–901.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sankoff, David & Suzanne Laberge. 1978. The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods, 239–250. New York & London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Sankoff, Gillian & Hélèn Blondeau. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3). 560–588.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schilling, Natalie. 2013. Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Schleef, Erik, Miriam Meyerhoff & Lynn Clark. 2011. Teenagers’ acquisition of variation: A comparison of locally-born and migrant teens’ realisation of English (ing) in Edinburgh and London. English World-Wide 32(2). 206–236.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schleef, Erik & Nicholas Flynn. 2015. Ageing meanings of (ing) in Manchester, England. English World-Wide 36(1). 48–90.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schleef, Erik, Nicholas Flynn & Will Barras. 2017. Regional diversity in social perceptions of (ing). Language Variation and Change 29. 29–56.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silfverberg, Miikka, Adam Wiemerslage, Ling Liu & Lingshuang Jack Mao. 2017. Data augmentation for morphological reinflection. Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017: 90–99.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Jennifer, Mercedes Durham, & Liane Fortune. 2007. “Mam, ma troosers is fa’in doon!” Community, caregiver and child in the acquisition of variation in Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1). 63–99.Google Scholar

  • Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Alexandra D’Arcy. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1). 58–108.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter. 2010. Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. In Miriam Meyerhoff & Erik Schleef (eds.), The Routledge Sociolinguistics Reader, 358–368. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Wagner, Suzanne Evans. 2012. Real-time evidence for age grad(ing) in late adolescence. Language Variation and Change 24. 179–202.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Hofwegen, Janneke & Walt Wolfram. 2010. Coming of age in African American English: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14. 27–52.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Van Hofwegen, Janneke & Walt Wolfram. 2017. On the utility of composite indices in longitudinal language study. In Suzanne Evans Wagner & Isabelle Buchstaller (eds.), Panel studies in language variation and change, 73–98. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-15

Accepted: 2018-11-19

Published Online: 2019-06-22


Funding Source: European Research Council

Award identifier / Grant number: 321760

European Research Council, Funder Id: 10.13039/100011199, Grant Number: 321760.


Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, Volume 5, Issue s2, 20180024, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0024.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Supplementary Article Materials

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in