Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff

CiteScore 2018: 0.95

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.381
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.841

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Processing gender stereotypes in dementia patients and older healthy adults: a self-paced reading study

Daniel Müller-Feldmeth / Katharina Ahnefeld / Adriana Hanulíková
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Freiburg, Department of German – German Linguistics, 79098 Freiburg, Germany, Tel.: +0049 761 2039341
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-06-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0029


We used self-paced reading to examine whether stereotypical associations of verbs with women or men as prototypical agents (e.g. the craftsman knits a sweater) are activated during sentence processing in dementia patients and healthy older adults. Effects of stereotypical knowledge on language processing have frequently been observed in young adults, but little is known about age-related changes in the activation and integration of stereotypical information. While syntactic processing may remain intact, semantic capacities are often affected in dementia. Since inferences based on gender stereotypes draw on social and world knowledge, access to stereotype information may also be affected in dementia patients. Results from dementia patients (n = 9, average age 86.6) and healthy older adults (n = 14, average age 79.5) showed slower reading times and less accuracy in comprehension scores for dementia patients compared to the control group. While activation of stereotypical associations of verbs was visible in both groups, they differed with respect to the time-course of processing. The effect of stereotypes on comprehension accuracy was visible for healthy adults only. The evidence from reading times suggests that older adults with and without dementia engage stereotypical inferences during reading, which is in line with research on young adults.

Keywords: aging; dementia; gender stereotypes; self-paced reading; sentence processing

Shared authorship.


  • Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015a. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 1–48.Google Scholar

  • Bates, Douglas, Robert Kliegl, Shravan Vasishth & Harald R. Baayen. 2015b. Parsimonious mixed models. Available from arXiv:1506.04967 (stat.ME).Google Scholar

  • Burke, Deborah M. & Meredith A. Shafto. 2008. Language and aging. In Fergus I. M. Craik & Timothy A. Salthouse (eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition ( 3), 373–443. New-York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Carreiras, Manual, Alan Garnham, Jane Oakhill & Kate Cain. 1996. The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 49(3). 639–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark-Cotton, Manuella R., R. K. Williams, Mira Goral & Loraine K. Obler. 2007. Language and communication in aging. In James E. Birren (ed.), Encyclopedia of gerontology: Age, aging, and the aged (2nd ed.), 1–8. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Contreras, Juan Manuel, Mahzarin R. Banaji & Jason P. Mitchell. 2012. Dissociable neural correlates of stereotypes and other forms of semantic knowledge. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7(7). 764–770.Google Scholar

  • Duffy, Susan A. & Jessica A. Keir. 2004. Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge. Memory & Cognition 32(4). 551–559.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ebaid, Deena, Sheila G. Crewther, Kirsty MacCalman, Alyse Brown & Daniel P. Crewther. 2017. Cognitive Processing Speed across the Lifespan: Beyond the Influence of Motor Speed. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 9. 62.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Esaulova, Yulia, Chiara Reali & Lisa von Stockhausen. 2014. Influences of grammatical and stereotypical gender during reading: Eye movements in pronominal and noun phrase anaphor resolution. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(7). 781–803.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Federmeier, Kara D., Marta Kutas & Rina Schul. 2010. Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language 115(3). 149–161.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garnham, Alan, Jane Oakhill & David Reynolds. 2002. Are inferences from stereotyped role names to characters’ gender made elaboratively? Memory & Cognition 30(3). 439–446.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Kemper, Susan & Joan McDowd. 2006. Eye movements of young and older adults while reading with distraction. Psychology and Aging 21(1). 32–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kempler, Daniel & Mira Goral. 2008. Language and dementia: Neuropsychological aspects. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 28. 73–90.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kempler, Daniel, Amit Almor, Lorraine K. Tyler, Elaine S. Andersen & Maryellen C. MacDonald. 1998. Sentence comprehension deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: A comparison of off-Line vs. on-line sentence processing. Brain and Language 64(3). 297–316.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Kennison, Shelia M. & Jessie L. Trofe. 2003. Comprehending pronouns: A role for word-specific gender stereotype information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(3). 355–378.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Kreiner, Hamutal, Patrick Sturt & Simon Garrod. 2008. Processing definitional and stereotypical gender in reference resolution: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 58(2). 239–261.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Luke, Steven G. 2017. Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods 49(4). 1494–1502.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacDonald, Maryellen C., Amit Almor, Victor W. Henderson, Daniel Kempler & Elaine S. Andersen. 2001. Assessing working memory and language comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language 78(1). 17–42.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKoon, Gail & Roger Ratcliff. 1992. Inference during reading. Psychological Review 99(3). 440–466.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Misersky, Julia, Pascal M. Gygax, Paolo Canal, Ute Gabriel, Alan Garnham, Friederike Braun, Tania Chiarini, Kjellrun Englund, Adriana Hanulíková, Anton Öttl, Jana Valdrova, Lisa Von Stockhausen & Sabine Sczesny. 2014. Norms on the gender perception of role nouns in Czech, English, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, and Slovak. Behavior Research Methods 46(3). 841–871.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Mitchell, D. C. 1984. An evaluation of subject-paced reading tasks and other methods for investigating immediate processes in reading. In David Kieras & Marcel A. Just (eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research, 69–89. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Molinaro, Nicola, Jui-Ju Su & Manuel Carreiras. 2016. Stereotypes override grammar: Social knowledge in sentence comprehension. Brain and Language 155–156. 36–43.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Norris, Catherine J., E. Elinor Chen, David C. Zhu, Steven L. Small & John T. Cacioppo. 2004. The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(10). 1818–1829.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oakhill, Jane, Alan Garnham & David Reynolds. 2005. Immediate activation of stereotypical gender information. Memory & Cognition 33(6). 972–983.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, Denise & Angela Gutchess. 2006. The cognitive neuroscience of aging and culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15(3). 105–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, Denise C., Gary Lautenschlager, Trey Hedden, Natalie S. Davidson, Anderson D. Smith & Pamela K. Smith. 2002. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging 17(2). 299–320.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, Brennan R. & Elizabeth A. L. Stine–Morrow. 2012. Aging, parafoveal preview, and semantic integration in sentence processing: Testing the cognitive workload of wrap-up. Psychology and Aging 27(3). 638–649.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, Brennan R. & Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow. 2016. Risk for mild cognitive impairment is associated with semantic integration deficits in sentence processing and memory. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 71(2). 243–253.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peelle, Jonathan E., Vanessa Troiani, James Gee, Peachie Moore, Corey McMillan, Luisa Vesely & Murray Grossman. 2008. Sentence comprehension and voxel-based morphometry in progressive nonfluent aphasia, semantic dementia, and nonaphasic frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Neurolinguistics 21(5). 418–432.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Radvansky, Gabriel A., Nicholas A. Lynchard & William von Hippel. 2009. Aging and Stereotype Suppression. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 16(1). 22–32.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Radvansky, Gabriel A., David E. Copeland & William von Hippel. 2010. Stereotype activation, inhibition, and aging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(1). 51–60.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Reali, Chiara, Yulia Esaulova & Lisa von Stockhausen. 2015. Isolating stereotypical gender in a grammatical gender language: Evidence from eye movements. Applied Psycholinguistics 36(4). 977–1006.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Reilly, Jamie & Jonathan E. Peelle. 2008. Effects of semantic impairment on language processing in semantic dementia. Seminar in Speech and Language 29(01). 32–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Singmann, Henrik, Ben Bolker, Jake Westfall & Frederik Aust. 2018. afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package, version 0.19-1.Google Scholar

  • Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna, Francesca Pesciarelli & Cristina Cacciari. 2012. The electrophysiological underpinnings of processing gender stereotypes in language. PLoS One 7(12). e48712.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna, Paul Warren, Francesca Pesciarelli & Cristina Cacciari. 2015. Gender stereotypes across the ages: On-line processing in school-age children, young and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1388.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stine, Elizabeth L. 1990. On-line processing of written text by younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 5(1). 68–78.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vasishth, Shravan. 2006. On the proper treatment of spillover in real-time reading studies: Consequences for psycholinguistic theories. Proceedings of the International Conference on Linguistic Evidence, 96–100. Tübingen, Germany.Google Scholar

  • von Hippel, William, Lisa A. Silver & Molly E. Lynch. 2000. Stereotyping against your will: The role of inhibitory ability in stereotyping and prejudice among the elderly. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(5). 523–532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • White, Katherine R. G., Stephen L. Crites, Jennifer H. Taylor & Guadalupe Corral. 2009. Wait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 4(2). 191–198.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • White, Katherine R. G., Rose H. Danek, David R. Herring, Jennifer H. Taylor & Stephen L. Crites. 2018. Taking priming to task. Social Psychology 49(1). 29–46.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wingfield, Arthur & Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow. 2000. Language and speech. In Fergus I. M. Craik, & Timothy A. Salthouse (eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition, (2nd ed.), 359–416. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-05

Accepted: 2018-12-14

Published Online: 2019-06-22

Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, Volume 5, Issue s2, 20180029, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0029.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in