Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics Vanguard

A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Bergs, Alexander / Cohn, Abigail C. / Good, Jeff


CiteScore 2018: 0.95

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.381
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.841

Online
ISSN
2199-174X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Grammaticalization and the linguistic individual: new avenues in lifespan research

Lynn Anthonissen
  • University of Antwerp, Linguistics Department, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Department of English and American Studies, Schellingstr. 3, 80799 Munich, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Peter Petré
Published Online: 2019-06-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0037

Abstract

This paper reviews theoretical and methodological advances and issues in lifespan research and discusses how the issues at stake are addressed in an ongoing research project. Summarizing the state of the art, we conclude that next to nothing is known about lifespan changes affecting syntactic or grammaticalizing constructions that goes beyond exploratory or anecdotal evidence. The Mind-Bending Grammars project, which examines the adaptive powers of adult cognition and constraints on these powers, aspires to make headway in this area. In this paper, we introduce some of the major goals of the project and present a new large-scale longitudinal corpus of 50 adults that was established to study grammatical change across the lifespan. Particular attention is paid to the constraints on the adoption of novel grammatical patterns in the aging mind. Taking be going to as a case study, we present evidence that (highly educated) healthy monolingual speakers continue to participate in grammatical innovations across the lifespan.

Keywords: lifespan change; be going to; grammaticalization; longitudinal corpus; language and aging

References

  • Anthonissen, Lynn. Forthcoming. Constructional change across the lifespan: The nominative and infinitive in early modern writers. In Kristin Bech & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Grammar – discourse – context: Grammar and usage in language variation and change. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Baltes, Paul B. 1987. Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology 23(5). 611–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman & Tom Schoenemann. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system. Language Learning 59. 1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social networks and historical sociolinguistics. Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Bialystok, Ellen, Fergus I. M. Craik, Raymond Klein & Mythili Viswanathan. 2004. Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging 19(2). 290–303.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowie, David. 2015. Phonological variation in real time: Patterns of adult linguistic stability and change. In Annette Gerstenberg & Anja Voeste (eds.), Language development: The lifespan perspective, 39–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bowie, David & Malcah Yaeger-Dror. 2015. Phonological change in real time. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 603–618. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brysbaert, Marc, Michaël Stevens, Paweł Mandera & Emmanuel Keuleers. 2016. How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant’s age. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 1116.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2015. Exploring linguistic malleability across the life span: Age-specific patterns in quotative use. Language in Society 44. 457–496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2016. Investigating the effect of socio-cognitive salience and speaker-based factors in morpho-syntactic life-span change. Journal of English Linguistics 44(3). 199–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Budts, Sara & Peter Petré. 2016. Reading the intentions of be going to. Folia Linguistica Historica 37(1). 1–32.Google Scholar

  • Burke, Deborah M. 2006. Representation and aging. In Ellen Bialystok & Fergus I. M. Craik (eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change, 193–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995.The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Clark, Robin & Ian Roberts. 1993. A computational model of language learning and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 229–345.Google Scholar

  • Craik, Fergus I. M. & Ellen Bialystok. 2006. Cognition through the lifespan: Mechanisms of change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(3). 131–138.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Croft, William. 2000.Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Danchev, Andrei & Merja Kytö. 1994. The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 59–77. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • de Bot, Kees & Robert W. Schrauf (eds.). 2009.Language development over the lifespan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88. 601–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Smet, Hendrik. 2016. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28. 83–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deary, Ian J. Janie Corley, Alan J. Gow, Sarah E. Harris, Lorna M. Houlihan, Riccardo E. Marioni, Lars Penke, Snorri B. Rafnsson & John M. Star. 2009. Age-associated cognitive decline. British Medical Bulletin 92. 135–152.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • ECCO = Eighteenth Century Collections Online. 2018. Text Creation Partnership. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ecco/ (accessed 4 March 2018).

  • Eckert, Penelope. 1997. Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics, 151–167. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • EEBO = Early English Books Online. 2003–2018. ProQuest. http://eebo.chadwyck.com (accessed 4 March 2018).

  • Emery, Olga B. 1986. Linguistic decrement in normal aging. Language & Communication 6(1/2). 47–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fraser, Kathleen C., Jed A. Meltzer & Frank Rudzicz. 2016. Linguistic features identify Alzheimer’s disease in narrative speech. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 49(2). 407–422.Google Scholar

  • Garrard, Peter, Lisa M. Maloney, John R. Hodges & Karalyn Patterson. 2005. The effects of very early Alzheimer’s disease on the characteristics of writing by a renowned author. Brain 128(2). 250–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Gerstenberg, Annette & Anja Voeste (eds.). 2015a. Language development: The lifespan perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Gerstenberg, Annette & Anja Voeste. 2015b. Investigating the lifespan perspective. In Annette Gerstenberg & Anja Voeste (eds.), Language development: The lifespan perspective, 1–8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Grant, Bridget F. & Deborah A. Dawson. 1997. Age of onset of alcohol use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: Results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. Journal of Substance Abuse 9. 103–110.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harada, Caroline N., Marissa C. Natelson Love & Kristen Triebel. 2013. Normal cognitive aging. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 29(4). 737–752.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Heim, Christine, D. Jeffrey Newport, Tanja Mletzko, Andrew H. Miller & Charles B. Nemeroff. 2008. The link between childhood trauma and depression: Insights from HPA axis studies in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33(6). 693–710.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henry, Alison. 1997. Viewing change in progress: The loss of verb-second in Hiberno-English imperatives. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 273–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Illes, Judy. 1989. Neurolinguistic features of spontaneous language production dissociate three forms of neurodegenerative disease: Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s. Brain and Language 37(4). 628–642.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Lancashire, Ian. 2015. Vocabulary and dementia in six novelists. In Annette Gerstenberg & Anja Voeste (eds.), Language development: The lifespan perspective, 78–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Le, Xuan, Ian Lancashire, Greame Hirst & Regina Jokel. 2011. Longitudinal detection of dementia through lexical and syntactic changes in writing: A case study of three British novelists. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(4). 435–461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lenneberg, Eric H. 1967.Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Lightfoot, David. 1979.Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lightfoot, David. 1999.The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Lindenberger, Ulman. 2014. Human cognitive aging: Corriger la fortune? Science 346. 572–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKenzie, Laurel. 2017. Frequency effects over the lifespan: A case study of Attenborough’s r’s. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1). 1–12. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miendlarzewska, Ewa A. & Wiebke J. Trost. 2014. How musical training affects cognitive development: Rhythm, reward and other modulating variables. Frontiers in Neuroscience 7. 279.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Nahkola, Kari & Marja Saanilahti. 2004. Mapping language changes in real time: A panel study on Finnish. Language Variation and Change 16. 75–92.Google Scholar

  • O’Sullivan, M., D. K. Jones, P. E. Summers, R. G. Morris, S. C. R. Williams & H. S. Markus. 2001. Evidence for cortical “disconnection” as a mechanism of age-related cognitive decline. Neurology 57(4). 632–638.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Penfield, Wilder & Lamar Roberts. 1959.Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Petré, Peter. 2015–. Mind-Bending Grammars. Website of the project (ID 639008), ERC Horizon 2020 programme. Antwerp: University of Antwerp. www.uantwerpen.be/en/projects/mind-bending-grammars/.

  • Petré, Peter. 2016. Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation. Micro-changes in the grammaticalization of [be going to INF]. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30. 115–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petré, Peter. 2017. The extravagant progressive: An experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [be Ving]. English Language and Linguistics 21(2). 227–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petré, Peter. Forthcoming. How constructions are born: The role of patterns in the constructionalization of be going to INF. In Ruth Möhlig-Falke & Beatrix Busse (eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New perspectives on a ubiquitous concept. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Petré, Peter, Lynn Anthonissen, Sara Budts, Enrique Manjavacas, William Standing, Emma-Louise Silva & Odile A. O. Strik. Forthcoming. Early Modern Multiloquent Authors (EMMA): Designing a large-scale corpus of individuals’ languages. ICAME Journal 43.Google Scholar

  • Petré, Peter & Freek Van de Velde. 2018. The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language 94(4). 867–901.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramscar, Michael, Ching Chu Sun, Peter Hendrix & Harald Baayen. 2017. The mismeasurement of mind: Life-span changes in paired-associate-learning scores reflect the “cost” of learning, not cognitive decline. Psychological Science 28(8). 1171–1179.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramscar, Michael, Peter Hendrix, Cyrus Shaoul, Petar Milin & Harald Baayen. 2014. The myth of cognitive decline: Non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 6(1). 5–42.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2005. Language change in adulthood: Historical letters as evidence. European Journal of English Studies 9(1). 37–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2009. Lifespan changes in the language of three early modern gentlemen. In Arja Nurmi, Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800), 165–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Arja Nurmi. 2011. Grammaticalization and language change in the individual. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 251–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Salthouse, Timothy A. 2009. When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of Aging 30. 507–514.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sankoff, Gillian & Hélène Blondeau. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3). 560–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shafto, Meredith A. & Lorraine K. Tyler. 2014. Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science 346. 583–587.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Singh-Manoux, Archana, Mika Kivimaki, M. Maria Glymour, Alexis Elbaz, Claudine Berr, Klaus P. Ebmeier, Jane E. Ferrie & Aline Dugravot. 2012. Timing of onset of cognitive decline: Results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 344. d7622.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sowell, Elizabeth R., Bradley S. Peterson, Paul M. Thompson, Suzanne E. Welcome, Amy L. Henkenius & Arthur W. Toga. 2003. Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nature Neuroscience 6(3). 309–315.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Steinhauer, Karsten. 2014. Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: A brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical periods in L2. Applied Linguistics 35(4). 393–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Szatloczki, Greta, Ildiko Hoffmann, Veronika Vincze, Janos Kalman & Magdolna Pakaski. 2015. Speaking in Alzheimer’s disease, is that an early sign? Importance of changes in language abilities in Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 7. 195.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Alexandra D’Arcy. 2007. Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 19(2). 199–217.Google Scholar

  • Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2012. On the persistence of ambiguous linguistic context over time: Implications for corpus research on micro-changes. In Joybrato Mukherjee & Magnus Hüber (eds.), Corpus linguistics and variation in English: Theory and description, 231–246. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

  • Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2015. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Jóhanna Barð*dal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 51–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2010.Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2013.Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • van Velzen, Marjolein H. & Peter Garrard. 2008. From hindsight to insight – retrospective analysis of language written by a renowned Alzheimer’s patient. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 33(4). 278–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Velzen, Marjolein H., Luca Nanetti & Peter P. de Deyn. 2014. Data modelling in corpus linguistics: How low may we go? Cortex 55. 192–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • White, Erin J., Stefanie A. Hutka, Lynne J. Williams & Sylvain Moreno. 2013. Learning, neural plasticity and sensitive periods: Implications for language acquisition, music training and transfer across the lifespan. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7. 1–18.Google Scholar

  • Williams, John Delane & Marily G. Klug. 1996. Aging and cognition: Methodological difference in outcome. Experimental Aging Research 22(3). 219–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 1989. Realtime vs. apparent time change in Montreal French. York Papers in Linguistics 13. 141–153.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-20

Accepted: 2018-12-04

Published Online: 2019-06-22


Funding Source: ERC Horizon 2020 programme

Award identifier / Grant number: 639008

First authorship is shared for this paper. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper. The research reported on in this paper is part of the Mind-Bending Grammars project, which is funded by the ERC Horizon 2020 programme (Funder ID 10.13039/100010663, Project ID 639008; www.uantwerpen.be/mind-bending-grammars/), and is hosted at the University of Antwerp. Both institutions are hereby gratefully acknowledged.


Citation Information: Linguistics Vanguard, Volume 5, Issue s2, 20180037, ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0037.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in