Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistic Typology

Ed. by Plank, Frans

3 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.304

CiteScore 2016: 0.53

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.629
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.234

Online
ISSN
1613-415X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 9, Issue 3 (Dec 2005)

Issues

Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes

Nicholas Evans / Toshiki Osada
Published Online: 2005-12-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2005.9.3.351

Abstract

Mundari, an Austroasiatic language of India (Munda family), has often been cited as an example of a language without word classes, where a single word can function as noun, verb, adjective, etc. according to the context. These claims, originating in a 1903 grammar by the missionary John Hoffmann, have recently been repeated uncritically by a number of typologists. In this article we review the evidence for word class fluidity, on the basis of a careful analysis of Hoffmann’s corpus as well as substantial new data, including a large lexical sample at two levels of detail. We argue that in fact Mundari does have clearly definable word classes, with distinct open classes of verb and noun, in addition to a closed adjective class, though there are productive possibilities for using all as predicates. Along the way, we elaborate a series of criteria that would need to be met before any language could seriously be claimed to lack a noun-verb distinction: most importantly strict compositionality, bidirectional flexibility, and exhaustiveness through the lexicon.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-12-21

Published in Print: 2005-12-12


Citation Information: Linguistic Typology, ISSN (Online) 1613-415X, ISSN (Print) 1430-0532, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2005.9.3.351.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Gh. Karimi-Doostan
Lingua, 2011, Volume 121, Number 2, Page 207
[2]
Erkki Luuk
Lingua, 2009, Volume 119, Number 11, Page 1707
[3]
Erkki Luuk
Language Sciences, 2010, Volume 32, Number 3, Page 349
[4]
Simeon Floyd
Linguistic Typology, 2011, Volume 15, Number 1
[5]
Gholamhossein Karimi-Doostan
Studia Linguistica, 2011, Volume 65, Number 1, Page 70
[6]
David Gil
Theoretical Linguistics, 2009, Volume 35, Number 1
[7]
Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Martine Vanhove, and Peter Koch
Linguistic Typology, 2007, Volume 11, Number 1
[8]
Anna Margetts and Peter K Austin
Linguistics, 2007, Volume 45, Number 3
[10]
Elisabetta Ježek and Paolo Ramat
Folia Linguistica, 2009, Volume 43, Number 2
[11]
Eva van Lier
Folia Linguistica, 2006, Volume 40, Number 3-4
[12]
John Peterson and Utz Maas
Morphology, 2009, Volume 19, Number 2, Page 207
[13]

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in