Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistic Typology

Ed. by Plank, Frans

3 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.304

CiteScore 2016: 0.53

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.629
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.234

Online
ISSN
1613-415X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 16, Issue 3 (Nov 2012)

Issues

“Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects

Nathan W. Hill
Published Online: 2012-12-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016

Abstract

Largely through the efforts of Scott DeLancey the grammatical category “mirative” has gained currency in linguistics. DeLancey bases his elaboration of this category on a misunderstanding of the semantics of ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan. Rather than showing “surprising information”, linguists working on Tibetan have long described ḥdug as a sensory evidential. Much of the evidence DeLancey and Aikhenvald present for mirativity in other languages is also susceptible to explanation in terms of sensory evidence or appears close to Lazard's “mediative” (1999) or Johanson's “indirective” (2000). Until an independent grammatical category for “new information” is described in a way which precludes analysis in terms of sensory evidence or other well established evidential categories, mirativity should be excluded from the descriptive arsenal of linguistic analysis.

About the article


Published Online: 2012-12-30

Published in Print: 2012-11-27


Citation Information: Linguistic Typology, ISSN (Online) 1613-415X, ISSN (Print) 1430-0532, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016.

Export Citation

© 2012 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Mario Serrano-Losada
Journal of Historical Linguistics, 2017, Volume 7, Number 1-2
[2]
Juha Yliniemi
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 2016, Volume 39, Number 1, Page 105
[3]
Tyler Peterson
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2016, Volume 45, Number 6, Page 1327
[4]
Nicolas Tournadre and Randy J. LaPolla
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 2014, Volume 37, Number 2, Page 240

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in