Ed. by Plank, Frans / Cysouw, Michael
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.455
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.663
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.377
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.719
Still mirative after all these years
1University of Oregon, U.S.A.
Citation Information: Linguistic Typology. Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 529–564, ISSN (Online) 1613-415X, ISSN (Print) 1430-0532, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020, December 2012
- Published Online:
This article re-presents the case, first presented in DeLancey (1997), for the mirative as a crosslinguistic category, and responds to critiques of that work by Gilbert Lazard and Nathan Hill. The nature of the mirative, a category which marks a statement as representing information which is new or unexpected, is exemplified with data from Kham (Tibeto-Burman) and Hare (Athabaskan). The mirative category is shown to be distinct from the well-known mediative or indirective evidential category. Finally, the role of mirativity in the complex verbal systems of Tibetan languages is briefly outlined.