Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Linguistic Typology

Ed. by Plank, Frans

3 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.455

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.663
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.377
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.719

See all formats and pricing
Volume 16, Issue 3 (Nov 2012)


Still mirative after all these years

Scott Delancey
  • University of Oregon, U.S.A.
  • Email:
Published Online: 2012-12-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020


This article re-presents the case, first presented in DeLancey (1997), for the mirative as a crosslinguistic category, and responds to critiques of that work by Gilbert Lazard and Nathan Hill. The nature of the mirative, a category which marks a statement as representing information which is new or unexpected, is exemplified with data from Kham (Tibeto-Burman) and Hare (Athabaskan). The mirative category is shown to be distinct from the well-known mediative or indirective evidential category. Finally, the role of mirativity in the complex verbal systems of Tibetan languages is briefly outlined.

About the article

Published Online: 2012-12-30

Published in Print: 2012-11-27

Citation Information: Linguistic Typology, ISSN (Online) 1613-415X, ISSN (Print) 1430-0532, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in