Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Linguistic Typology

Ed. by Plank, Frans

3 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.304

CiteScore 2016: 0.53

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.629
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.234

Online
ISSN
1613-415X
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 20, Issue 2 (Oct 2016)

Issues

The challenge of making language description and comparison mutually beneficial

Martin Haspelmath
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Menschheitsgeschichte, Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-09-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0008

Abstract

I argue that the distinction between comparative concepts and descriptive categories helps language describers and typologists to benefit from each other because describers are free to set up their own categories, typologists are free to define their own concepts, comparison need not involve complete systems, and interlinear translation can be either based on comparative concepts or descriptive categories. A similar distinction also exists in other disciplines that deal with cultural concepts.

Keywords: categories; comparison; methodology

References

  • Brown, Lea & Matthew S. Dryer. 2008. The verbs for ‘and’ in Walman, a Torricelli language of Papua New Guinea. Language 84. 528–565.Google Scholar

  • Currie, Thomas E., Simon J. Greenhill, Russell D. Gray, Toshikazu Hasegawa & Ruth Mace. 2010. Rise and fall of political complexity in island South-East Asia and the Pacific. Nature 467(7317). 801–804.Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86. 663–687.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Defining vs. diagnosing linguistics categories: A case study of clitic phenomena. In Joanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krzysztof Migdalski (eds.), How categorical are categories? New approaches to the old questions of noun, verb and adjective, 273–303. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. The serial verb construction: Comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics 17. 291‒319.Google Scholar

  • LaPolla, Randy J. & Dory Poa. 2006. On describing word order. In Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing, 269–295. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Lazard, Gilbert. 2005. What are we typologists doing? In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges& David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 1–23. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Nichols, Johanna & Balthasar Bickel. 2005. Locus of marking: Whole-language typology. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://wals.info/chapter/25Google Scholar

  • Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 1985. Language typology and syntactic description. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 2007. Language typology and syntactic description. 2nd edn. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Vincent, Nigel. 2013. Conative. Linguistic Typology 17. 269–289.Google Scholar

  • Wälchli, Bernhard & Michael Cysouw. 2012. Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50. 671–710.Google Scholar

  • Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Clitics and particles. Language 61. 283–305.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-03-20

Published Online: 2016-09-27

Published in Print: 2016-10-01


Citation Information: Linguistic Typology, ISSN (Online) 1613-415X, ISSN (Print) 1430-0532, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0008.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in