Aarts, Bas. 2004. Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language 28. 1‒49.Google Scholar

Adelaar, K. Alexander & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.). 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Banti, Giorgio. 1988. ‘Adjectives’ in East Cushitic. In Marianne Bechhaus-Gerst & Fritz Serzisko (eds.), Cushitic – Oromo: Papers from the International Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic languages, Cologne, January 6‒9, 1986, 205–259. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar

Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Vol. 4: Wortstellung, Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Blake, Barry J. 1983. Structure and word order in Kalkatungu: The anatomy of a flat language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 3. 143–175.Google Scholar

Bulmer, Ralph. 1967. Why is the cassowary not a bird? A problem of zoological taxonomy among the Karam of the New Guinea highlands. Man 2. 5–25.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315–332.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra & Alan Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. In Shopen (ed.) 1985, Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1990. A conceptual framework for grammatical categories (or: a taxonomy of Propositional Acts). Journal of Semantics 7. 245–279.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2009. Joseph Harold Greenberg. Bibliographic Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 90. 153–198.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2014. Comparing categories and constructions crosslinguistically (again): The diversity of ditransitives. Linguistic Typology 18. 533–551.Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2010. Dealing with diversity: Towards an explanation of NP word order frequencies. Linguistic Typology 14. 253–287.Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar. 2nd revised edn. Edited by Kees Hengeveld. 2 vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Devos, Maud. 2008. A grammar of Makwe. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.Google Scholar

Elliott, Jennifer R. 2000. Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology 4. 55–90.Google Scholar

Emenanjo, Nolue. 1978. Elements of modern Igbo grammar. Ibadan: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Foley, William A. 1976. Towards a universal typology of the noun phrase. Studies in Language 4. 171–199.Google Scholar

Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In Shopen (ed.) 1985, Vol. 1: Clause structure, 282–364.Google Scholar

García Velasco, Daniel & Jan Rijkhoff. 2008. Introduction. In Daniel García Velasco & Jan Rijkhoff (eds.), The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar, 1–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language (2nd edn.), 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hagman, Roy S. 1973. Nama Hottentot grammar. New York: Columbia University doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 2014. Decorative morphology in Khmer. In Jeffrey P. Williams (ed.), The aesthetics of grammar: Sound and meaning in the languages of mainland Southeast Asia, 61‒82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth. 1997. An interview with Professor Ken Hale, by Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma. Glot International 2(9/10). 1, 26‒28.Google Scholar

Harnad, Steven. 2005. To cognize is to categorize: Cognition is categorization. In Henri Cohen & Claire Levebvre (eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science, 20–44. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 119–132.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.). 2001. Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva & Gunther Kaltenböck. 2014. Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language and Cognition 6. 146–180.Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators. Journal of Linguistics 25. 127–157.Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees, Jan Rijkhoff & Anna Siewierska. 2004. Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics 40. 527–570.Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35. 848–893.

Kittilä, Seppo. 2006. Object-, animacy- and role-based strategies: A typology of object marking. Studies in Language 30. 1–32.Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2007. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (2nd edn.), Vol. 1: Clause structure, 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1690 [1825]. An essay concerning human understanding. London: Tegg.

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Machery, Edouard. 2009. Doing without concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L. 2000. Dependency reversal in noun-attribute constructions: Towards a typology. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Malt, Barbara C. 2010. Why we should do without concepts. Mind and Language 25. 622–633.Google Scholar

Maslova, Elena. 2000. A dynamic approach to the verification of distributional universals. Linguistic Typology 4. 307–333.Google Scholar

Miner, Kenneth L. 1986. Noun stripping and loose incorporation in Zuni. International Journal of American Linguistics 52. 242–254.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 2008. Functional categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Newman, Paul. 1987. Hausa and the Chadic languages. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 705‒723. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Perkins, Revere D. 1988. The covariation of culture and grammar. In Mark T. Hammond, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 359–378. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Perkins, Revere D. 2001. Sampling procedures and statistical methods. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2001, 419–434.

Reboul, Anne. 2001. Foundations of reference and predication. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2001, 509–522.

Rijkhoff, Jan. 1990. Toward a unified analysis of terms and predications. In Jan Nuyts, A. Machtelt Bolkestein & Co Vet (eds.), Layers and levels of representation in language theory: A functional view, 165–191. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. On the interaction of linguistic typology and Functional Grammar. Functions of Language 9. 209–237.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2004. The noun phrase. Expanded paperback edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2008a. Synchronic and diachronic evidence for parallels between noun phrases and sentences. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Interdependence of diachronic and synchronic analyses, 13–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2008b. On flexible and rigid nouns. Studies in Language 32. 727–752.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2009a. On the (un)suitability of semantic categories. Linguistic Typology 13. 95–104.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2009b. On the co-variation between form and function of adnominal possessive modifiers in Dutch and English. In William B. McGregor (ed.), The expression of possession, 51–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2010a. Rara and grammatical theory. In Wohlgemuth & Cysouw (eds.) 2010a, 223–240.

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2010b. Functional categories in the noun phrase: On jacks-of-all-trades and one-trick-ponies in Danish, Dutch and German. Deutsche Sprache 38(2/10). 97–123. Available online at http://pub.ids-mannheim.de/laufend/deusprach/ds10-2.html

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2014. Modification as a propositional act. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space, 129–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2015. Word order. In James D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd edn.), Vol. 25, 644–656. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan & Dik Bakker. 1998. Language sampling. Linguistic Typology 2. 263–314.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan, Dik Bakker, Kees Hengeveld & Peter Kahrel. 1993. A method of language sampling. Studies in Language 17. 169–203.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan & Johanna Seibt. 2005. Mood, definiteness and specificity: A linguistic and a philosophical account of their similarities and differences. Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning 3. 85–132.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan & Eva van Lier (eds.). 2013. Flexible word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1972. The category squish: Endstation Hauptwort. Chicago Linguistic Society 8. 316–328.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm. 1998. Proto-Oceanic adjectival categories and their morphosyntax. Oceanic Linguistics 37. 85–119.Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Shopen (ed.) 1985, Vol. 1: Clause structure, 155–196.Google Scholar

Sampson, Geoffrey. 1980. Schools of linguistics: Competition and evolution. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2001. Scales of nouniness and verbiness. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2001, 495–509.

Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sharma, Devidatta D. 1988. A descriptive grammar of Kinnauri. Delhi: Mittal.Google Scholar

Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 1985. Language typology and syntactic description. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer L. 2015. Parts of speech in phonology. Presented at the 17th LIPP Symposium “Parts of speech across languages, in acquisition, mind and brain”, München, 6 July 2015. Handout available at http://www.unc.edu/~jlsmith/home/pdf/smith2012_PoS-in-phono_17LIPP-hdt.pdf

Smith, Linda B. & Larissa K. Samuelson. 1997. Perceiving and remembering: Category stability, variability and development. In Koen Lamberts & David Shanks (eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories, 161–195. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung. 2001. Linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon. 2011. The problem of cross-linguistic classification. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 90–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

van de Velde, Freek. 2007. Interpersonal modification in the English noun phrase. Functions of Language 14. 203–230.Google Scholar

van de Velde, Freek. 2012. A structural-functional account of NP-internal mood. Lingua 122. 1–23.Google Scholar

van der Voort, Hein. 2004. A grammar of Kwaza. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

van der Voort, Hein. 2006. Construções atributivas em Kwazá. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi: Ciências humanas 1(1). 87–104. Available online at http://www.museu-goeldi.br/editora/humanas/index.html

Weil, Henri. 1844. De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Joubert. Translated by C. W. Super as The order of words in the ancient languages compared with that of the modern languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1978.Google Scholar

Welmers, William E. & Beatrice F. Welmers. 1969. Noun modifiers in Igbo. International Journal of American Linguistics 35. 315–322.Google Scholar

Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw (eds.). 2010a. Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw (eds.). 2010b. Rara & rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Young, Robert W. & Morgan, William, Sr. 1987. The Navajo language: A grammar and colloquial dictionary. Revised edn. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.