Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistic Typology

Founded by Plank, Frans

Editor-in-Chief: Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.304

CiteScore 2017: 0.45

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.285
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.810

Print + Online
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 20, Issue 2


Crosslinguistic categories in morphosyntactic typology: Problems and prospects

Jan Rijkhoff
  • Lingvistik, Institut for kommunikation og kultur, Aarhus Universitet, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 2, Nobelparken, bygning 1485-621, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-09-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0010


This article offers a new, transparent method to construe morphosyntactic categories for crosslinguistic research. It avoids the problem of categorial confusion attested in major post-Greenbergian studies in morphosyntactic typology, in particular in probabilistic typological investigations, which tend to mix up semantic and formal criteria and marginalize “statistically insignificant” morphosyntactic variants. These and other problems are avoided by using functional criteria as the starting point in identifying comparable forms and constructions in different languages. Subsequently formal and semantic criteria are employed to arrive at a morphosyntactic category whose members are sufficiently similar in terms of function, form, and meaning.

Keywords: categories; comparison; methodology; syntax


  • Aarts, Bas. 2004. Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language 28. 1‒49.Google Scholar

  • Adelaar, K. Alexander & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.). 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

  • Banti, Giorgio. 1988. ‘Adjectives’ in East Cushitic. In Marianne Bechhaus-Gerst & Fritz Serzisko (eds.), Cushitic – Oromo: Papers from the International Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic languages, Cologne, January 6‒9, 1986, 205–259. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar

  • Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Vol. 4: Wortstellung, Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

  • Blake, Barry J. 1983. Structure and word order in Kalkatungu: The anatomy of a flat language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 3. 143–175.Google Scholar

  • Bulmer, Ralph. 1967. Why is the cassowary not a bird? A problem of zoological taxonomy among the Karam of the New Guinea highlands. Man 2. 5–25.Google Scholar

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315–332.Google Scholar

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Chung, Sandra & Alan Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. In Shopen (ed.) 1985, Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 1990. A conceptual framework for grammatical categories (or: a taxonomy of Propositional Acts). Journal of Semantics 7. 245–279.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 2009. Joseph Harold Greenberg. Bibliographic Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 90. 153–198.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 2014. Comparing categories and constructions crosslinguistically (again): The diversity of ditransitives. Linguistic Typology 18. 533–551.Google Scholar

  • Cysouw, Michael. 2010. Dealing with diversity: Towards an explanation of NP word order frequencies. Linguistic Typology 14. 253–287.Google Scholar

  • Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar. 2nd revised edn. Edited by Kees Hengeveld. 2 vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Devos, Maud. 2008. A grammar of Makwe. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.Google Scholar

  • Elliott, Jennifer R. 2000. Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology 4. 55–90.Google Scholar

  • Emenanjo, Nolue. 1978. Elements of modern Igbo grammar. Ibadan: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Foley, William A. 1976. Towards a universal typology of the noun phrase. Studies in Language 4. 171–199.Google Scholar

  • Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In Shopen (ed.) 1985, Vol. 1: Clause structure, 282–364.Google Scholar

  • García Velasco, Daniel & Jan Rijkhoff. 2008. Introduction. In Daniel García Velasco & Jan Rijkhoff (eds.), The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar, 1–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language (2nd edn.), 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Hagman, Roy S. 1973. Nama Hottentot grammar. New York: Columbia University doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Haiman, John. 2014. Decorative morphology in Khmer. In Jeffrey P. Williams (ed.), The aesthetics of grammar: Sound and meaning in the languages of mainland Southeast Asia, 61‒82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hale, Kenneth. 1997. An interview with Professor Ken Hale, by Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma. Glot International 2(9/10). 1, 26‒28.Google Scholar

  • Harnad, Steven. 2005. To cognize is to categorize: Cognition is categorization. In Henri Cohen & Claire Levebvre (eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science, 20–44. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 119–132.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.). 2001. Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva & Gunther Kaltenböck. 2014. Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language and Cognition 6. 146–180.Google Scholar

  • Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators. Journal of Linguistics 25. 127–157.Google Scholar

  • Hengeveld, Kees, Jan Rijkhoff & Anna Siewierska. 2004. Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics 40. 527–570.Google Scholar

  • Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35. 848–893.

  • Kittilä, Seppo. 2006. Object-, animacy- and role-based strategies: A typology of object marking. Studies in Language 30. 1–32.Google Scholar

  • König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2007. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (2nd edn.), Vol. 1: Clause structure, 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Locke, John. 1690 [1825]. An essay concerning human understanding. London: Tegg.

  • Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Machery, Edouard. 2009. Doing without concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej L. 2000. Dependency reversal in noun-attribute constructions: Towards a typology. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

  • Malt, Barbara C. 2010. Why we should do without concepts. Mind and Language 25. 622–633.Google Scholar

  • Maslova, Elena. 2000. A dynamic approach to the verification of distributional universals. Linguistic Typology 4. 307–333.Google Scholar

  • Miner, Kenneth L. 1986. Noun stripping and loose incorporation in Zuni. International Journal of American Linguistics 52. 242–254.Google Scholar

  • Muysken, Pieter. 2008. Functional categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Newman, Paul. 1987. Hausa and the Chadic languages. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 705‒723. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

  • Perkins, Revere D. 1988. The covariation of culture and grammar. In Mark T. Hammond, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 359–378. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Perkins, Revere D. 2001. Sampling procedures and statistical methods. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2001, 419–434.

  • Reboul, Anne. 2001. Foundations of reference and predication. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2001, 509–522.

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 1990. Toward a unified analysis of terms and predications. In Jan Nuyts, A. Machtelt Bolkestein & Co Vet (eds.), Layers and levels of representation in language theory: A functional view, 165–191. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. On the interaction of linguistic typology and Functional Grammar. Functions of Language 9. 209–237.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2004. The noun phrase. Expanded paperback edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2008a. Synchronic and diachronic evidence for parallels between noun phrases and sentences. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Interdependence of diachronic and synchronic analyses, 13–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2008b. On flexible and rigid nouns. Studies in Language 32. 727–752.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2009a. On the (un)suitability of semantic categories. Linguistic Typology 13. 95–104.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2009b. On the co-variation between form and function of adnominal possessive modifiers in Dutch and English. In William B. McGregor (ed.), The expression of possession, 51–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2010a. Rara and grammatical theory. In Wohlgemuth & Cysouw (eds.) 2010a, 223–240.

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2010b. Functional categories in the noun phrase: On jacks-of-all-trades and one-trick-ponies in Danish, Dutch and German. Deutsche Sprache 38(2/10). 97–123. Available online at http://pub.ids-mannheim.de/laufend/deusprach/ds10-2.html

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2014. Modification as a propositional act. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space, 129–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2015. Word order. In James D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd edn.), Vol. 25, 644–656. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan & Dik Bakker. 1998. Language sampling. Linguistic Typology 2. 263–314.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan, Dik Bakker, Kees Hengeveld & Peter Kahrel. 1993. A method of language sampling. Studies in Language 17. 169–203.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan & Johanna Seibt. 2005. Mood, definiteness and specificity: A linguistic and a philosophical account of their similarities and differences. Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning 3. 85–132.Google Scholar

  • Rijkhoff, Jan & Eva van Lier (eds.). 2013. Flexible word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ross, John Robert. 1972. The category squish: Endstation Hauptwort. Chicago Linguistic Society 8. 316–328.Google Scholar

  • Ross, Malcolm. 1998. Proto-Oceanic adjectival categories and their morphosyntax. Oceanic Linguistics 37. 85–119.Google Scholar

  • Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Shopen (ed.) 1985, Vol. 1: Clause structure, 155–196.Google Scholar

  • Sampson, Geoffrey. 1980. Schools of linguistics: Competition and evolution. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

  • Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2001. Scales of nouniness and verbiness. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2001, 495–509.

  • Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sharma, Devidatta D. 1988. A descriptive grammar of Kinnauri. Delhi: Mittal.Google Scholar

  • Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 1985. Language typology and syntactic description. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Jennifer L. 2015. Parts of speech in phonology. Presented at the 17th LIPP Symposium “Parts of speech across languages, in acquisition, mind and brain”, München, 6 July 2015. Handout available at http://www.unc.edu/~jlsmith/home/pdf/smith2012_PoS-in-phono_17LIPP-hdt.pdf

  • Smith, Linda B. & Larissa K. Samuelson. 1997. Perceiving and remembering: Category stability, variability and development. In Koen Lamberts & David Shanks (eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories, 161–195. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Song, Jae Jung. 2001. Linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Stassen, Leon. 2011. The problem of cross-linguistic classification. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 90–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • van de Velde, Freek. 2007. Interpersonal modification in the English noun phrase. Functions of Language 14. 203–230.Google Scholar

  • van de Velde, Freek. 2012. A structural-functional account of NP-internal mood. Lingua 122. 1–23.Google Scholar

  • van der Voort, Hein. 2004. A grammar of Kwaza. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • van der Voort, Hein. 2006. Construções atributivas em Kwazá. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi: Ciências humanas 1(1). 87–104. Available online at http://www.museu-goeldi.br/editora/humanas/index.html

  • Weil, Henri. 1844. De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Joubert. Translated by C. W. Super as The order of words in the ancient languages compared with that of the modern languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1978.Google Scholar

  • Welmers, William E. & Beatrice F. Welmers. 1969. Noun modifiers in Igbo. International Journal of American Linguistics 35. 315–322.Google Scholar

  • Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw (eds.). 2010a. Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw (eds.). 2010b. Rara & rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Young, Robert W. & Morgan, William, Sr. 1987. The Navajo language: A grammar and colloquial dictionary. Revised edn. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

About the article

Received: 2016-03-28

Revised: 2016-06-09

Published Online: 2016-09-27

Published in Print: 2016-10-01

Citation Information: Linguistic Typology, Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 333–363, ISSN (Online) 1613-415X, ISSN (Print) 1430-0532, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0010.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in