Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistic Typology

Founded by Plank, Frans

Editor-in-Chief: Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.304

CiteScore 2017: 0.45

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.285
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.810

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 22, Issue 2


The last word on polysynthesis: A review article

Martin Haspelmath
  • Corresponding author
  • Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-08-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0011

Reviewed publication

Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun and Nicholas Evans (eds.) 2017. Oxford handbook of polysynthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1,088 Pages, ISBN: 9780199683208 (Hardback), 125GBP


  • Aydemir, Yasemin. 2004. Are Turkish preverbal bare nouns syntactic arguments? Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 465–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, Mark C. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bergsland, Knut. 1997. Aleut grammar. Fairbanks, Alaska: University of Alaska.Google Scholar

  • Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: H. Holt and Company.Google Scholar

  • Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1). 1–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 25–49. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Creissels, Denis & Dramé Djibril. 2015. Noun incorporation and transitivity in Soninke (West Mande). Leiden. http://www.deniscreissels.fr.

  • Croft, William. 2016. Comparative concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 377–393. doi:10.1515/lingty-2016-0012.Web of Science

  • Dixon, Robert M. W. 1977. Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 1. 19–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 1997. On the six-way word order typology. Studies in Language 21. 69–103.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, Nicholas & Hans-Jürgen Sasse. 2002. Introduction: Problems of polysynthesis. In Nicholas Evans & Hans-Jürgen Sasse (eds.), Problems of polysynthesis, 1–13. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Green, Ian. 1989. Marrithiyel: A language of the Daly River region of Australia’s Northern Territory. Canberra: Australian National University PhD Thesis.Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1960. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. International Journal of American Linguistics 26(3). 178–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2009. An empirical test of the Agglutination Hypothesis. In Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, 13–29. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2011a. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1). 31–80.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2011b. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Lingustic Typology 15(3). 535–567.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2012. How to compare major word-classes across the world’s languages. In Thomas Graf, Denis Paperno, Anna Szabolcsi & Jos Tellings (eds.), Theories of everything: In honor of Edward Keenan, 109–130. Los Angeles: UCLA: UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. The serial verb construction: Comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics 17(3). 291–319. doi:10.1177/2397002215626895.CrossrefWeb of Science

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Grammaticalization from a typological perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Johns, Alana. 2007. Restricting noun incorporation: Root movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(3). 535–576. doi:10.1007/s11049-007-9021-1.CrossrefWeb of Science

  • Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Towards a universal definition of “subject.”. In Charles N Li & Sandra A Thompson (eds.), Subject and topic, 303–334. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Massam, Diane. 2017. Incorporation and pseudo-incorporation in syntax. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.190.

  • Mattissen, Johanna. 2003. Dependent-head synthesis in Nivkh: A contribution to a typology of polysynthesis. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Michael, Lev D. 2013. Possession in Nanti. In Alexandra Y Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology, 149–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). 2013. Atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62(1). 56–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Odom, Karan J., Michelle L. Hall, Katharina Riebel, Kevin E. Omland & Naomi E. Langmore. 2014. Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nature Communications 5. 3379. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ramamurti, G.V. 1931. A manual of the So:ra:, (or Savara) language. Madras: Government Press.Google Scholar

  • Siewierska, Anna. 2005. Alignment of verbal person marking. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 406–409. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://wals.info/feature/100A.

  • Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-03-07

Revised: 2018-05-17

Published Online: 2018-08-16

Published in Print: 2018-08-28

Citation Information: Linguistic Typology, Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 307–326, ISSN (Online) 1613-415X, ISSN (Print) 1430-0532, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0011.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in