Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Laboratory Phonology

Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology

Ed. by Cole, Jennifer


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.667
Rank 85 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

Online
ISSN
1868-6354
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Situationally independent prosodic phrasing

Shari R. Speer
  • Corresponding author
  • *The Ohio State University
  • Email:
/ Paul Warren
  • **Victoria University of Wellington
  • Email:
/ Amy J. Schafer
  • ***University of Hawai'i
  • Email:
Published Online: 2011-05-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.002

Abstract

A series of speech production and categorization experiments demonstrates that naïve speakers and listeners reliably use correspondences between prosodic phrasing and syntactic constituent structure to resolve standing and temporary ambiguity. Materials obtained from a co-operative gameboard task show that prosodic phrasing effects (e.g., the location of the strongest break in an utterance) are independent of discourse factors that might be expected to influence the impact of syntactic ambiguity, including the availability of visual referents for the meanings of ambiguous utterances and the use of utterances as instructions versus confirmations of instructions. These effects hold across two dialects of English, spoken in the American Midwest, and New Zealand. Results from PP-attachment and verb transitivity ambiguities indicate clearly that the production of prosody-syntax correspondences is not conditional upon situational disambiguation of syntactic structure, but is rather more directly tied to grammatical constraints on the production of prosodic and syntactic form. Differences between our results and those reported elsewhere are best explained in terms of differences in task demands.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

About the article

Published Online: 2011-05-03

Published in Print: 2011-05-01



Citation Information: Laboratory Phonology, ISSN (Online) 1868-6354, ISSN (Print) 1868-6346, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.002. Export Citation

Supplementary Article Materials

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Rory Turnbull, Rachel Steindel Burdin, Cynthia G. Clopper, and Judith Tonhauser
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2015, Page 1
[2]
Bahia Guellaï, Alan Langus, and Marina Nespor
Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, Volume 5
[3]
Hamutal Kreiner and Zohar Eviatar
Brain and Language, 2014, Volume 137, Page 91
[4]
Cynthia G. Clopper and Judith Tonhauser
International Journal of American Linguistics, 2013, Volume 79, Number 2, Page 219
[5]
Claudia Männel, Christine S. Schipke, and Angela D. Friederici
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2013, Volume 5, Page 86
[6]
Sasha Calhoun
Journal of Phonetics, 2012, Volume 40, Number 2, Page 329
[7]
Alan Langus, Erika Marchetto, Ricardo Augusto Hoffmann Bion, and Marina Nespor
Journal of Memory and Language, 2012, Volume 66, Number 1, Page 285

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in