Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Laboratory Phonology

Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology

Ed. by Cole, Jennifer

IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.667
Rank 85 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

More options …

Towards a gestural characterization of liquids: Evidence from Spanish and Russian

Michael Proctor
Published Online: 2011-10-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.017


The production of intervocalic liquid consonants by five speakers of Spanish and four speakers of Russian was examined using ultrasound. Liquids in both languages were found to be united by a lower susceptibility to vocalic coarticulation than coronal obstruents produced in the same environments. Tongue body articulation in the Spanish lateral resembled that of a mid-front vowel; dorsal posture in the Spanish trill resembled that of a mid-back vowel. Tongue body articulation in Russian non-palatalized laterals resembled that of a mid-back vowel, and Russian non-palatalized trills were produced with a dorsal posture resembling that of a mid-central vowel.

These results are consistent with the hypothesis that coronal liquid consonants consist of a consonant-like coronal component and an intrinsic vowel-like dorsal component (Delattre and Freeman, Linguistics 44: 29– 68, 1968; Sproat and Fujimura, Journal of Phonetics 21: 291–311, 1993). Liquid segments are modeled as recurrent stable constellations in which a tongue-tip gesture is coordinated with a tongue-body gesture (Browman and Goldstein, Gestural syllable position effects in American English, AIP Press, 1995). Differences between ‘clear’ and ‘pharyngealized’ liquids are attributed to differences in dorsal target locations. Rhotic allophony is argued to result from the interaction of articulatory and aerodynamic factors. Spanish liquid vocalization is modeled as lenition of tongue tip gestures, and Slavic liquid metathesis as a change in intergestural coupling relationships.

About the article

Published Online: 2011-10-13

Published in Print: 2011-10-01

Citation Information: Laboratory Phonology, Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 451–485, ISSN (Online) 1868-6354, ISSN (Print) 1868-6346, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.017.

Export Citation

© 2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Benjamin Elie and Yves Laprie
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017, Volume 142, Number 5, Page 3245
Jeff Mielke, Christopher Carignan, and Erik R. Thomas
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017, Volume 142, Number 1, Page 332
Sylvia Moosmüller, Carolin Schmid, and Christian H. Kasess
Language and Speech, 2016, Volume 59, Number 4, Page 488
Suzanne E. Boyce, Sarah M. Hamilton, and Ahmed Rivera-Campos
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2016, Volume 30, Number 3-5, Page 174
Marija Tabain, Andrew Butcher, Gavan Breen, and Richard Beare
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016, Volume 139, Number 1, Page 361
Scott Myers
Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 2015, Volume 36, Number 1
Phil Howson, Alexei Kochetov, and Pascal van Lieshout
Journal of Phonetics, 2015, Volume 49, Page 117
Daniel Recasens and Meritxell Mira
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015, Volume 137, Number 1, Page 397

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in