Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Lodz Papers in Pragmatics

Founded by Cap, Piotr

Editor-in-Chief: Chilton, Paul / Kopytowska, Monika


CiteScore 2018: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.197
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.787

Online
ISSN
1898-4436
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The "Dark Side" of Humour. An Analysis of Subversive Humour in Workplace Emails

Stephanie Schnurr / Charley Rowe
Published Online: 2008-08-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0010-6

The "Dark Side" of Humour. An Analysis of Subversive Humour in Workplace Emails

Although a substantial amount of research has investigated the various functions of humour in a workplace context, electronic means of communication have largely been ignored. This is particularly surprising since electronic communication in the workplace is increasingly gaining significance. This seems to be especially true for email, which in many workplaces is the preferred medium for communicating transactional as well as relational topics. Drawing on a corpus of about 100 emails collected in an academic setting, we explore how humour is used in workplace emails. Our specific focus is on subversive humour, which often functions as a tool to express frustration and dissent, and ultimately to challenge existing power relations. Our analysis illustrates that subversive humour is an excellent means to make fun of established and normative workplace practices by exaggerating and ridiculing them, and to re-define organisational reality by offering alternative interpretations. These functions of subversive humour appear to be particularly useful for those in relatively powerful positions: by employing humour to convey critical and potentially threatening messages in acceptable ways, the senders manage to express their dissent and frustration with the wider organisational system while, at the same time, escaping the scrutiny of the very organisation that they are symbolically challenging.

Keywords: Subversive humour; email; workplace

  • Holmes, Janet., Meredith Marra and Louise Burns. "Women's humour in the workplace: A quantitative analysis." Australian Journal of Communication 28.1 (2001): 83-108.Google Scholar

  • Holmes, Janet., Meredith Marra and Meredith Marra. "Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends." Humor 15.1 (2002): 65-87, doi: 10.1515/humr.2002.006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. "‘War on terror’, rest in peace…" Rockridge Institute (February 28, 2006) http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/research/lakoff/gwot_rip

  • Abdullah, Nor Aniza. Relational Communication in Organisational Email: A Malaysian Case Study. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Baron, Naomi. "Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email." Language and Communication 18 (1998): 133-170, doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00005-6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, Reva Berman and Dermott Keegan. "Humor in the hotel kitchen." Humor 12.1 (1999): 47-70.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah. Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Caudron, Shari. "Humor is healthy in the workplace." Personnel Journal 71.6 (1992): 63-68.Google Scholar

  • Clouse, Wilburn and Karen Spurgeon. "Corporate analysis of humor." Psychology: A Journal of Human Behaviour 32.3-4 (1995): 1-24.Google Scholar

  • Collinson, David L. "‘Engineering humour’: Masculinity, joking and conflict in shop-floor relations." Organization Studies 9.2 (1988): 181-199, doi: 10.1177/017084068800900203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Consalvo, Carmine M. "Humor in management: No laughing matter." Humor 2.3 (1989): 285-297.Google Scholar

  • Coser, Rose Laub. "Laughter among colleagues. A study of social functions of humor among the staff of a mental hospital." Psychiatry 23 (1960): 81-95.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Diekmannshenke, Hajo. "From postcard to e-card: Tradition and change in the smallest spaces." In Language and New Media: Linguistic, Cultural, and Technological Evolutions, edited by Charley Rowe and Eva L. Wyss. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press (in print).Google Scholar

  • Duncan, Jack W. and Philip J. Feisal. "No laughing matter: Patterns of humour in the workplace." Organizational Dynamics 17.3 (1989): 18-30, doi: 10.1016/S0090-2616(89)80024-5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duncan, Jack W., Larry R. Smeltzer and Terry L. Leap. "Humor and work: Applications of joking behavior to management." Journal of Management 16.2 (1990): 255-278, doi: 10.1177/014920639001600203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ehrenberg, Tamar. "Female differences in creation of humor relating to work." Humor 8.4 (1995): 349-362.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, Norman. Language and Power. London: Longman, 1989.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, Norman. and Ruth Wodak. "Critical discourse analysis." In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited by Teun van Dijk, 258-284. London: Sage, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Fatt, James Poon Teng. "When business can be fun." Management Research News 25.1 (2000): 39-48, doi: 10.1108/01409170210783016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleming, Peter and André Spicer. "Beyond power and resistance: New approaches to organizational politics." Management Communication Quarterly 21.3 (2008): 301-309, doi: 10.1177/0893318907309928.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gumperz, John. "On interactional sociolinguistic method." In Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, edited by Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts, 453-471. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Holmes, Janet. "No joking matter! The functions of humour in the workplace." Paper presented at the Australian Linguistics Society Conference. Queensland: Brisbane University, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Holmes, Janet. "Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace." Discourse Studies 2.2 (2000): 159-185, doi: 10.1177/1461445600002002002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lynch, Owen Hanley. "Humorous communication: Finding a place for humour in communication research." Communication Theory 12.4 (2002): 423-445, doi: 10.1093/ct/12.4.423, 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00277.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morreall, John. "Humor and work." Humor 4.3-4 (1991): 359-373.Google Scholar

  • Mullany, Louise. "Gender, politeness and institutional power roles: Humour as a tactic to gain compliance in workplace business meetings." Multilingua 23 (2004): 13-37, doi: 10.1515/mult.2004.002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mullany, Louise. Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2007.Google Scholar

  • "Oxford English Dictionary: The definitive record of the English language" http://www.oed.com/

  • Pizzini, Franca. "Communication hierarchies in humour: Gender differences in the obsterical/gynaecological setting." Discourse and Society 2.4 (1991): 477-488, doi: 10.1177/0957926591002004008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pogrebin, Mark R and Eric D. Poole. "Humor in the briefing room. A study of the strategic uses of humor among police." Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 17.2 (1988): 183-210, doi: 10.1177/089124188017002003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poster, Mark. The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Rodrigues, Suzana B. and David L. Collinson. "‘Having fun?’ Humour as resistance in Brazil." Organization Studies 16.5 (1995): 739-768, doi: 10.1177/017084069501600501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, Lawrence. "A qualitative investigation of the use of humor by emergency personnel as a strategy for coping with stress." Journal of Emergency Nursing 17 (1998): 197-202.Google Scholar

  • Rowe, Charley. "Genesis and evolution of an email sibling code." Ph.D. diss. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Rowe, Charley. "Building ‘code’: Development, maintenance, and change in a private language." American Speech 82.3 (2007): 235-261, doi: 10.1215/00031283-2007-011.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schnurr, Stephanie. Leadership Discourse at Work. Interactions of Humour, Gender and Workplace Culture. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, fc.Google Scholar

  • Seckman, Mark A. and Carl J. Couch. "Jocularity, sarcasm, and relationships: An empirical study." Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18.3 (1989): 327-344, doi: 10.1177/089124189018003004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sproull, Lee and Sara Kiesler. "Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication." Management Science 32 (1986): 1492-1512. Reprinted in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings, edited by Irene Grief. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman, 1988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ulloth, Joan Kay. "A qualitative view of humor in nursing classrooms." Journal of Nursing Education 42.3 (2003): 125-129.Google Scholar

  • Van Dijk, Teun A. "The study of discourse." In Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. I, edited by Teun Van Dijk, 1-34. London: Sage, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Waldvogel, Joan. The Role, Status and Style of Workplace Email: A Study of Two New Zealand Workplaces. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Waldvogel, Joan. "Greetings and closings in workplace email." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2007): 456-477, doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00333.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wodak, Ruth. "What CDA is about - a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments." In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1-13. London: Sage, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Yates, Simeon. "English in cyberspace." In Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities, edited by Sharon Goodman and David Graddol, 106-133. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2008-08-06

Published in Print: 2008-01-01


Citation Information: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 109–130, ISSN (Online) 1898-4436, ISSN (Print) 1895-6106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0010-6.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Peter Jackson and Angela Meah
Food, Culture & Society, 2019, Volume 22, Number 3, Page 262
[2]
Letícia Stallone and Michael Haugh
Language & Communication, 2017, Volume 55, Page 10
[3]
Manuel Cruz and Marta Dynel
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 2009, Volume 5, Number 2

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in