Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Lodz Papers in Pragmatics

Founded by Cap, Piotr

Editor-in-Chief: Chilton, Paul / Kopytowska, Monika

CiteScore 2017: 0.35

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.249
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.074

See all formats and pricing
More options …

No Aggression, Only Teasing: The Pragmatics of Teasing and Banter

Marta Dynel
Published Online: 2008-03-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0001-7

No Aggression, Only Teasing: The Pragmatics of Teasing and Banter

A bone of contention among researchers is whether the primary function of humour is the expression of aggression against the hearer or the promotion of solidarity between the interlocutors. It is commonly averred that teasing boasts a dichotomous nature, i.e. malignant and benevolent. The former coincides with the potential for criticising, mocking and ostracising the interlocutor, whereas the latter accounts for playfulness and bonding capacity.

The overriding goal of the paper is to expound the rapport-building function, which is here postulated to be inherent to teasing. First and foremost, I will determine the scope of interest differentiating between putdown humour and teases, which may assume the form of retorts and develop into multi-turn teases, i.e. banter. Subtypes of teasing will be discussed with a view to proving that it is inherently devoid of genuine aggressiveness. The underlying premise is that teases, even if ostensibly aggressive, i.e. face-threatening, are geared towards solidarity, in conformity with the framework of politeness, including mock impoliteness, holding between intimates. Also, teases fulfil a few subordinate functions such as defunctionalisation or mitigation of face-threatening messages they may carry.

Keywords: Banter; bonding; mock impoliteness; putdown humour; solidarity; teasing

  • Boxer, Diana and Francesca Cortés-Conde. "From bonding and biting: Conversational joking and identity display." Journal of Pragmatics 23 (1997): 275-295, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978/1987.Google Scholar

  • Bubel, Claudia. "Film audiences as overhearers." Journal of Pragmatics 40 (2008): 55-71, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.001.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Coates, Jennifer. "Gossip revisited: language in all-female groups. In Women in their Speech Communities, edited by Jennifer Coates, 94-121. London: Longman, 1989.Google Scholar

  • Coates, Jennifer. Woman Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. "Towards an anatomy of impoliteness." Journal of Pragmatics 25 (1996): 349-367, doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drew, Paul. "Po-faced receipts of teases." Linguistics 25 (1987): 219-253.Google Scholar

  • Edelsky, Carole. "Who's got the floor?" Language in Society 10 (1981): 383-421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eder, Donna. "‘Go get ya a French!’: Romantic and sexual teasing among adolescent girls." In Gender and Conversational Interaction, edited by Deborah Tannen, 17-30. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Fine, Gary. "Sociological approaches to the study of humor." In Handbook of Humor Research Vol. 1, edited by Paul McGhee & Jeffrey Goldstein, 159-191. New York: Springer Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Freud, Sigmund. Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious, trans. by J. Stranchey. New York: Norton, 1905/1960.Google Scholar

  • Fry, William, Jr. Sweet Madness: A Study of Humor. Palo Alto: Pacific Books, 1963.Google Scholar

  • Grice, Paul. "Logic and conversation." In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41-58. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar

  • Hay, Jennifer. "Jocular abuse patterns in mixed-group interaction." Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 6 (1995a): 26-55.Google Scholar

  • Hay, Jennifer. "Only teasing." New Zealand English Newsletter 9 (1995b): 32-35.Google Scholar

  • Hay, Jennifer. "Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women." Journal of Pragmatics 32 (2000): 709-742, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holmes, Janet. "Sharing a laugh: pragmatic aspects of humour and gender in the workplace." Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2006): 26-50, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.007.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holmes, Janet and Meredith Marra. "Having a laugh at work: how humour contributes to workplace culture." Journal of Pragmatics 34 (2002): 1683-1710, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00032-2.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hutchby, Ian and Robin Wooffitt. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Keith-Spiegel, Patricia. "Early conceptions of humour: Varieties and issues." In The Psychology of Humour, edited by Jeffrey Goldstein & Paul McGhee, 3-39. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar

  • Keltner, Dacher, Lisa Capps, Ann Kring, Randall Young and Erin Heerey. "Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review." Psychological Bulletin 127.2 (2001): 229-248, doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kotthoff, Helga. "Impoliteness and conversational humor." Folia Linguistica 30 (1996): 299-327.Google Scholar

  • Kotthoff, Helga. "Oral genres of humor. On the dialectic of genre knowledge and creative authoring." Pragmatics 17.2. (2007): 263-296.Google Scholar

  • Kowalski, Robin. "‘I was only kidding!: Victims’ and perpetrators' perceptions of teasing." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26.2 (2000): 231-241, doi: 10.1177/0146167200264009.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • La Fave, Lawrence and Roger Mannell. "Does ethnic humour serve prejudice?" Journal of Communication 26.3 (1976): 116-123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lakoff, Robin. "The logic of politeness: Or minding your p's and q's." Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292-305. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar

  • Lampert, Martin and Susan Ervin-Tripp. "Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends." Journal of Pragmatics 38.1 (2006): 51-72, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Lennox Terrion, Jenepher and Blake E. Ashforth. "From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humour and identity in the development of a temporary group." Human Relations 55.1 (2000): 55-88, doi: 10.1177/001872602128782240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Long, Debra and Arthur Graesser. "Wit and humour in discourse processing." Discourse Processes 11 (1988): 35-60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martineau, William. "A model for the social function of humour." In The Psychology of Humour, edited by Jeffrey Goldstein & Paul McGhee, 101-125. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar

  • Mulkay, Michael. On Humor: Its Nature and its Place in Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1972.Google Scholar

  • Norrick, Neal. "Stock conversational witticisms." Journal of Pragmatics 8 (1984): 195-209, doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(84)90049-3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norrick, Neal. Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Norrick, Neal. "Involvement and joking in conversation." Journal of Pragmatics 22 (1994): 409-430, doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)90117-1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norrick, Neal. "Issues in conversational joking." Journal of Pragmatics 35 (2003): 1333-1359, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00180-7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pawluk, Cheryl. "Social construction of teasing." Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19.2 (1989): 145-167, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00142.x.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Pollio, Howard. "Notes toward a field theory of humour." In Handbook of Humour Research Vol. 1, edited by Paul McGhee and Jeffrey Goldstein, 213-230. New York: Springer, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Raskin, Victor. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985.Google Scholar

  • Scarborough Voss, Laurie. "Teasing, disputing and playing: Cross-gender interactions and space utilization among first and third Graders." Gender and Society 11 (1997): 238-256, doi: 10.1177/089124397011002006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scollon, Ron and Suzie Scollon. "Face in interethnic communication." In Language and Communication, edited by Jack Richards and Richard Schmidt, 156-188. London: Longman, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Straehle, Carolyn. "‘Samuel?‘ ‘Yes dear?’ Teasing and conversational rapport." In Framing in Discourse, edited by Deborah Tannen, 210-229. New York: Open University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Tannen, Deborah and Cynthia Wallat. "Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: examples from a medical examination/interview." In The Discourse Reader, edited by Adam Jaworski and Nicolas Coupland, 346-366, London: Routledge, 1999, doi: 10.2307/2786752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tholander, Michael and Karin Aronsson. "Doing subteaching in school groupwork. Positioning, resistance, and participation frameworks." Language and Education 17.3 (2003): 208-234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Veale, Tony, Kurt Feyaerts and Geert Brône. "The cognitive mechanisms of adversarial humor." HUMOR 19.3 (2006): 305-340, doi: 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zajdman, Anat. "Did you mean to be funny? Well if you say so…." HUMOR 5.4 (1992): 357-368.Google Scholar

  • Zajdman, Anat. "Humorous face-threatening acts: Humor as strategy." Journal of Pragmatics 23 (1995): 325-339, doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)00038-G.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziv, Avner. Personality and Sense of Humour. New York: Springer, 1984.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2008-03-20

Published in Print: 2008-01-01

Citation Information: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 241–261, ISSN (Online) 1898-4436, ISSN (Print) 1895-6106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0001-7.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Maria Kmita
Qualitative Research Journal, 2017, Volume 17, Number 4, Page 265
Lucy R. Betts and Karin A. Spenser
The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2017, Volume 178, Number 3, Page 147
Solvejg Wolfers, Kieran File, and Stephanie Schnurr
Journal of Pragmatics, 2017, Volume 112, Page 83
Dániel Z. Kádár and Siân Robinson Davies
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 2016, Volume 4, Number 2, Page 202
Roderick Hugh McKeown
Shakespeare, 2016, Volume 12, Number 1, Page 33
Michael Haugh
Australian Journal of Linguistics, 2014, Volume 34, Number 1, Page 76
Abby Mueller Dobs and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, Volume 53, Page 112
Naomi Geyer
Journal of Pragmatics, 2010, Volume 42, Number 8, Page 2120
Michael Haugh
Journal of Pragmatics, 2010, Volume 42, Number 8, Page 2106
Marta Dynel
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2009, Volume 3, Number 5, Page 1284

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in