Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Lodz Papers in Pragmatics

Founded by Cap, Piotr

Editor-in-Chief: Chilton, Paul / Kopytowska, Monika


CiteScore 2018: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.197
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.787

Online
ISSN
1898-4436
See all formats and pricing
More options …

On Pragmatics, Exercitive Speech Acts and Pornography

Mary McGowan
Published Online: 2009-04-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-009-0002-1

On Pragmatics, Exercitive Speech Acts and Pornography

Suppose that a suspect being questioned by the police says, "I think I'd better talk to a lawyer." Whether that suspect has invoked her right to an attorney depends on which particular speech act(s) her utterance is. If she is merely thinking aloud about what she ought to do, then she has not invoked that right. If, on the other hand, she has thereby requested a lawyer, she has. Similarly, suppose that an unhappily married man says "I want my wife dead." Whether he has thereby solicited his wife's murder depends on which particular speech act(s) his utterance is. If he is merely describing his desires, he has committed no crime. If, by contrast, he has thereby hired an assassin, he has. As one can see, experts on speech acts (e.g. philosophers, linguists, psychologists and sociologists) have a lot to say about various issues in the law.

I believe that expertise in speech act theory also illuminates various issues regarding free speech. In what follows, we consider how speech act theory may apply to certain arguments regarding the free speech status of pornography. In particular, we consider several speech act accounts of MacKinnon's claim that pornography subordinates women, but, before turning to such accounts, some background is offered.

Keywords: Pragmatics; pornography; speech acts; conversational exercitives

  • Austin, John. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

  • Langton, Rae. "Speech acts and unspeakable acts." Philosophy & Public Affairs 22.4 (1993): 293-330.Google Scholar

  • Langton, Rae. and Caroline West. "Scorekeeping in a pornographic language game." Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77.3 (1999): 300-322, doi: 10.1080/00048409912349061.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis, David. "Scorekeeping in a language game." In Philosophical Papers Volume I, New York: Oxford University Press: 233-249, 1983, doi: 10.1093/0195032047.003.0013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, Catharine. "Francis Biddle's sister: Pornography, civil rights and speech." In Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, edited by Catharine MacKinnon, 163-197. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

  • MacKinnon, Catharine. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

  • MacKinnon, Catharine. and Andrea Dworkin (eds.). Harms' Way: The Pornography Civil Rights Hearings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Maitra, Ishani and Mary Kate McGowan. "The limits of free speech: Pornography and the question of coverage." Legal Theory 13.1 (2007): 41-68, doi: 10.1017/S1352325207070024.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGowan, Mary Kate. "Conversational exercitives and the force of pornography." Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (2003): 155-189, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00155.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGowan, Mary Kate. "Conversational exercitives: Something else we do with our words." Linguistics and Philosophy 27.1 (2004): 93-111, doi: 10.1023/B:LING.0000010803.47264.f0.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGowan, Mary Kate. "On pornography: MacKinnon, speech acts and ‘false’ construction." Hypatia 20.3 (2005): 22-49, doi: 10.2979/HYP.2005.20.3.22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGowan, Mary Kate. "Oppressive speech." Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2009, forthcoming), doi: 10.1080/00048400802370334.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Searle, John. "A taxonomy of illocutionary acts." In Expression and Meaning, edited by John Searle, 1-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

  • Young, Iris Marion. "Five faces of oppression." In Rethinking Power, edited by Thomas Wartenberg, 174-195. New York: SUNY Press, 1992.Google Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2009-04-30

Published in Print: 2009-01-01


Citation Information: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 133–155, ISSN (Online) 1898-4436, ISSN (Print) 1895-6106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-009-0002-1.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Suzanne Whitten
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2018, Page 1
[2]
Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka and Maciej Witek
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 2009, Volume 5, Number 1, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in