Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Macedonian Veterinary Review

The Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine-Skopje at the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.32

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.195
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.387

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1857-7415
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Evaluation of Brucella Spp. Isolation Rates in Ruminant Abortion Cases by Using Different Selective Media

Mustafa Sencer Karagul / Serkan Ikiz
  • Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University, 34320, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-09-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2018-0024

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the success of Brucella spp. isolation in ruminant abortion cases by using different selective media. To this end, 58 samples from ruminant abortion cases were utilized. 4 selective media; namely, Farrell Medium (FM), CITA Medium (CM), Modified Thayer Martin (MTM) and Jones & Morgan (JM) were preferred for isolation. In addition to these, one medium with antibiotics was used to extend the range of the results. Suspensions prepared from organ and fetal stomach contents were inoculated to media plates and incubated at 37C° for 5-8 days in 5-10% CO2 condition. Conventional biotyping method was used to identify Brucella isolates within the level of species and biovar. MTM (67.2%) and Farrell (65.5%) outperformed the other media with regards to isolation rate. However, regarding the inhibition ability against contaminant microrganisms, Farrell (86.2%) and CITA (72%) have the highest and second highest percentages respectively. The media’s inhibition ability was examined in the samples in which Brucella spp. isolation occurred to be able to investigate the correlations between isolation and inhibition. Lower isolation percentage was observed in the samples in which the media displayed the lowest inhibition ability against contaminants. In this context, using two different selective media with high inhibition ability against contaminants may be recommended to enhance the isolation rate. Moreover, the components stimulating the growth of Brucella strains might be added to the media to obtain better results.

Keywords: Biovar; Brucella spp.; inhibition; isolation; selective medium

REFERENCES

  • 1. Godfroid J., Cloeckaert A., Liautard J.P., Kohler S., Fretin D., Walravens K., Garin-Bastuji B., Letesson J.J. (2005). From the discovery of the Malta fever’s agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brusellosis has continously been a re-emerging zonosis. Vet. Res. 36, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2005003 PMid:15845228Crossref

  • 2. Songer, J.G., K.W. Post. (2012). Brusella cinsi. [Brusella genus]. In: O. Ang, Y. Ozgur, (Eds.), Veteriner Hekimlik Mikrobiyolojisi-Hayvan Hastalığı Etkeni Olan Bakteriler ve Mantarlar. [Veterinary Microbiology: Bacterial and Fungal Agents of Animal Disease] (pp. 200-207). Istanbul, Turkey: Nobel Press. [in Turkish]Google Scholar

  • 3. Yumuk Z., O’Callaghan D. (2012). Brucellosis in Turkey-an overview. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 16 (4): 228-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.011 PMid:22333223Crossref

  • 4. Pappas G., Panagopoulou P., Chistou L., Akritidis N. (2006). Brucella as a biological weapon. Cell. Mol. Life. Sci. 63, 2229-2236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-006-6311-4 PMid:16964579Crossref

  • 5. Seleem M.N., Boyle S.M., Sriranganathan N. (2010). Brucellosis: A re-emerging zoonosis. Vet. Microbiol. 140 (3-4): 392-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.021 PMid:19604656Crossref

  • 6. Aydın N. (1997). Gram negatif küçük çomaklar-Brusella infeksiyonları. [Small gram negative cocci-Brucella infections]. In: M. Arda, A. Minbay, N. Leleoglu, N. Aydın, M. Kahraman, O. Akay, K.S. Diker, Özel mikrobiyoloji kitabı (pp. 110-124). Ankara, Türkiye: Medisan Yayınevi. [The Microbiology Book (pp.110-124). Ankara, Turkey: Medisan Press]. [in Turkish]Google Scholar

  • 7. Doganay M., Aygen B. (2003). Human brucellosis: an overview. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 7, 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1201-9712(03)90049-XCrossref

  • 8. Perez-Sancho M., Garcia-Seco T., Dominguez L., Alvarez J. (2015). Control of animal brucellosis, The most effective tool to prevent human brucellosis. http://www.intechopen.com/:http://www.intechopen.com/books/updates-onbrucellosis/control-of-animal-brucellosis-the-most-effective-tool-to-prevent-human-brucellosis [accessed on 09.24.2016].

  • 9. World Health Organisation. (2004). Laboratory safety manual, Third edition. Geneva.Google Scholar

  • 10. OIE. Terrestrial Manual Chapter 2.7.2. (2009). Caprine and ovine brucellosis.Google Scholar

  • 11. OIE. Terrestrial Manual Chapter 2.4.3. (2012). Bovine brucellosis.Google Scholar

  • 12. Godfroid, J., Scholz, H.C., Barbier, T., Nicolas, C., Wattiau, P., et al. (2011). Brucellosis at the animal/ecosystem/human interface at the beginning of the 21st century. Prev Vet. Med. 102, 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.007 PMid:21571380Crossref

  • 13. Krstevski K., Naletoski I., Mitrov D., Mrenoshki S., Cvetkovikj I., Janevski A., Dodovski A., Djadjovski I. (2015). Application of fluorescence based molecular assays for improved detection and typing of Brucella strains in clinical samples. Mac Vet Rev. 38 (2): 223-232. https://doi.org/10.14432/j.macvetrev.2015.09.055

  • 14. Marin, C.M., Alabart, J.L., Blasco, J.M. (1996). Effect of antibioctics contained in two Brucella selective media on growth of Brucella abortus, B. melitensis, and B. ovis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34 (2): 426-428. PMid:8789029 PMCid:PMC228811Google Scholar

  • 15. Stack, J.A., Harrıson, M., Perrett, L.L. (2002). Evaluation of a selective medium for Brucella isolation using natamycin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92, 724–728. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01595.x PMid:11966913Crossref

  • 16. Hornsby, R.L., Jensen, A.E., Olsen, S.C., Thoen, C.C. (2000). Selective media for isolation of Brucella abortus strain RB51. Vet. Microbiol. 73, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00149-8Crossref

  • 17. Marin, C.M., Jimenez De Bagues, M.P., Barberan, M., Blasco, J.M.(1996). Comparison of two selective media for the isolation of Brucella melitensis from naturally infected sheep and goats. Vet. Res. 138, 409-411. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.138.17.409Crossref

  • 18. Vicente, A.F., Antunes, J.M., Lara, G.H., Mioni, M.S.R., Allendorf, S.D., et al. (2014). Evaluation of three formulations of culture media for isolation of Brucella spp. regarding their ability to inhibit the growth of contaminating organisms. Biomed. Res. Int. 702072. PMid:24949466 PMCid:PMC4052881Google Scholar

  • 19. Pappas, G. (2010). The changing Brucella ecology: novel reservoirs, new threats. Int. J. Antimicrob. Ag. 365, 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.013 PMid:20696557Crossref

  • 20. Farrell, I.D. (1974). The development of a new selective medium for the isolation of Brucella abortus from contaminated sources. Res. Vet. Sci. 16, 280-286. PMid:4369280Google Scholar

  • 21. De Miguel, M.M., Marin, C.M., Munoz, P.M., Dieste, L., Grillo, M.J., Blasco, J.M. (2011). Development of a selective culture medium for primary isolation of the main Brucella species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49(4): 1458-1463. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02301-10 PMid:21270216 PMCid:PMC3122841Crossref

  • 22. Jones, L.M., Morgan, W.W. (1958). A preliminary report on a selective medium for the culture of Brucella, including fastidous types. Bull. World. Health. Organ. 19 (1): 200-203. PMid:13585070 PMCid:PMC2537688Google Scholar

  • 23. Drancourt, M., Raoult, D. (2007). Cost-effectiveness of blood agar for isolation of Mycobacteria. Plos. Negl. Trop. D. 1, 83. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000083 PMid:18060087 PMCid:PMC2100370Crossref

  • 24. Martin, W.K., Mattick, K.L., Harrison, M., Humphrey, T.J. (2002). Evaluation of selective media for Campylobacter isolation when cycloheximide is replaced with amphotericin B. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 34, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01058.x PMid:11849508Crossref

  • 25. Alton, G.G., Jones, L.M., Angus, R.D., Verger, J.M. (1988). Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory. Paris, France: Institut National de la Recherche Agromique-INRA.Google Scholar

  • 26. International Organisation for Standartization. ISO/TS Technical Spefication 11133-1. (2009). Microbiology of food and animal feeding guidelines on preparation and production of culture media. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.Google Scholar

  • 27. Her, M., Choa, D.H., Kang, S.I. (2010). The development of a selective medium for the Brucella abortus strains and its comparison with the currently recommended and used medium. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 67, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.12.013 PMid:20385349Crossref

  • 28. Jones, L.M., Dubray, G., Marly, J. (1975). Comparison of methods of diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection of rams. INRA editions. 6 (1): 11-22.Google Scholar

  • 29. O’ Grady, D., Byrne, W., Kelleher, P., O’callahan, H., Kenny, K., Heneghan, T., Power, S., Egan, J, Ryan, F. (2014). A comparative assessment of culture and serology in the diagnosis. Vet. J. 199, 370-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.01.008 PMid:24507882Crossref

  • 30. Ferreira, A.C., Almendra, C., Cardoso, R., Pereira, M.S., Pereira, A.B., Luikart, G., Correa De Sa, M.I. (2012). Development and evaluation of a selective medium for Brucella suis. Res. Vet. Sci. 93, 565-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.09.004 PMid:21968103Crossref

  • 31. Nardi Junior, G., Megid, J., Vicente, A.F. (2015). Comparison of Brucella agar, CITA and Farrell media for selective isolation of Brucella abortus from semen of bovine bulls. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 9 (9): 617-620. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2014.7252Crossref

  • 32. Fatolahzadeh, B., Maleknejad, P., Hejazi, M.J., Pyri, H. (2009). Development and evaluation of TUMS medium, a novel biphasic culture medium for isolation of Brucella spp. from patients. Iran. J. Microbiol.1 (2): 21-25.Google Scholar

  • 33. Keppie, J., Williams, A., Witt, K., Smith, H. (1965). The role of erythritol in tissue localization of the Brucellae. Brit. J. Exp. Pathol. 46, 104–108. PMid:14295553 PMCid:PMC2093692Google Scholar

  • 34. Garcia-Lobo, J.M., Sangari Garcia, J.F. (2005). Erythritol metobolism and virulence in Brucella. In: I. Lopez-Goni, I. Moriyon (Eds.), Brucella, Molecular and Celular Biology, (pp.223-236). Spain: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • 35. Seleem, M.N., Boyle, S.M., Srıranganathan N. (2008). Brucella: A pathogen without classic virulence genes. Vet. Microbiol. 129, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.11.023 PMid:18226477Crossref

  • 36. Poester, F.P., Samartino, L.E., Santos, R.L. (2013). Pathogenesis and pathology of Brucellosis in livestock. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics). 32 (1): 105-115. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.32.1.2193 PMid:23837369

  • 37. Sperry, J.F., Robertson, D.C. (1975). Inhibition of Growth by Erythritol Catabolism in Brucella abortus. J. Bacteriol. 124 (1): 391-397. PMid:170249 PMCid:PMC235907Google Scholar

About the article


Received: 2018-03-06

Revised: 2018-05-12

Accepted: 2018-07-04

Published Online: 2018-09-25


Citation Information: Macedonian Veterinary Review, ISSN (Online) 1857-7415, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2018-0024.

Export Citation

© 2018 Mustafa Sencer Karagul et al., published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in