Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Mammalia

Editor-in-Chief: Denys, Christiane


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.714
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.816

CiteScore 2017: 0.82

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.433
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.603

Online
ISSN
1864-1547
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 79, Issue 1

Issues

How accurate are coat traits for discriminating wild and hybrid forms of Felis silvestris?

Elena Ballesteros-Duperón
  • Corresponding author
  • Environment and Water Agency of Andalusia, Regional Ministry of Environment of the Junta de Andalucía, C/Joaquina Eguaras, 10, E 18013 Granada, Spain
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Emilio Virgós
  • Escet, Department of Biology and Geology, University King Juan Carlos, C/ Tulipan, s/n, E-28933 Madrid, Spain
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marcos Moleón
  • Environment and Water Agency of Andalusia, Regional Ministry of Environment of the Junta de Andalucía, C/Joaquina Eguaras, 10, E 18013 Granada, Spain
  • Centre for African Ecology, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ José M. Barea-Azcón
  • Environment and Water Agency of Andalusia, Regional Ministry of Environment of the Junta de Andalucía, C/Joaquina Eguaras, 10, E 18013 Granada, Spain
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ José M. Gil-Sánchez
  • Environment and Water Agency of Andalusia, Regional Ministry of Environment of the Junta de Andalucía, C/Joaquina Eguaras, 10, E 18013 Granada, Spain
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-03-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2013-0026

Abstract

Hybridisation between domestic cats, Felis catus, and wildcats, Felis silvestris, could lead to the genetic extinction of the latter; therefore, checking hybridisation rates in wild populations is of vital conservation importance. However, detecting hybridisation in the field is particularly challenging. Here, we aim to test the success of morphological-based procedures for discriminating wildcats from their hybrids and domestic cats, against genetic methods. We checked 17 putative Spanish wildcats by using two different classification systems based on coat patterns. None of the putative wildcats analysed in this study seemed to have an admixed genotype. Concordance between genetic and pelage approaches was almost total: only one coat classification produced mixed results with detection of one potential hybrid. Assignment was worse when performed in the field after a rapid examination of coat characters. We conclude that classification systems using coat traits could serve as surrogates of genetic approaches, but only after careful examination of those characters with more discriminatory power. Thus, the control of hybrid populations in the field as a management tool to preserve the genetic identity of wild forms is problematic if based on crude approaches or incomplete classification systems.

Keywords: genetic introgression; morphological discrimination; pelage characters; Spain; wildcat

References

  • Balharry, D. and M.J. Daniels. 1998. Wild living cats in Scotland. Survey and Monitoring Report 23. Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar

  • Barea-Azcón, J.M., E. Virgós, E. Ballesteros-Duperón, M. Moleón and M. Chirosa. 2007. Surveying carnivores at large spatial scales: a comparison of four broad-applied methods. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 1213–1230.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Beaumont, M., E.M. Barratt, D. Gottelli, A.C. Ktchener, M.J. Daniels, J.K. Pritchard and M.W. Bruford. 2001. Genetic diversity and introgression in the Scottish wildcat. Mol. Ecol. 10: 319–336.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Corbett, L.K. 1979. Feeding ecology and social organization of wildcats (Felis silvestris) and domestic cats (Felis catus) in Scotland. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.Google Scholar

  • Daniels, M.J., D. Balharry, D. Hirst, A.C. Kitchener and R.J. Aspinall. 1998. Morphological and pelage characteristics of wild living cats in Scotland: implications for defining the ‘wildcat’. J. Zool. 244: 231–247.Google Scholar

  • Daniels, M.J., M.A. Beaumont, P.J. Johnson, D. Balharry, D.W. Macdonald and E. Barratt. 2001. Ecology and genetics of wild-living cats in the north-east of Scotland and the implications for the conservation of the wildcat. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 146–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Driscoll, C.A. and K. Nowell. 2010. Felis silvestris. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 1 February 2014.

  • Driscoll, C.A., M. Menotti-Raymond, A.L. Roca, K. Hupe, W.E. Johnson, E. Geffen, E. Harley, M. Delibes, D. Portier, A.C. Kitchener, N. Yamaguchi, S.J. O’Brien and D.W. Macdonald. 2007. The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication. Science 317: 519–523.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Eichholzer, A. 2010. Testing the applicability of pictures taken by camera-traps for monitoring the European wildcat Felis silvestris silvestris in the Jura Mountains of Switzerland. MSc Thesis. University of Zürich, Switzerland. pp. 1–37.Google Scholar

  • EUROP. 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EECof 21ts May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Appendix IV. Office for Official Publications of the European Union. Available at http://europa.eu/. Accessed 29 January, 2013.

  • Fernández, E., F. de Lope and C. de la Cruz. 1992. Morphologie crânienne du chat sauvage (Felis silvestris) dans le sud de la Pénisule Ibérique: importance de l’introgression parle chat domestique (F. catus). Mammalia 56: 255–264.Google Scholar

  • French, D.D., L.K. Corbett and N. Easterbee. 1988. Morphological discriminants of Scottish wildcats (Felis silvestris), domestic cats (F. catus) and their hybrids. J. Zool. 214: 235–259.Google Scholar

  • Hertwig, S., A. Jungnickel, S. Stepanow, U.R. Böhle and M.S. Fischer. 2009. Regionally high rates of hybridization and introgression in German wildcat populations (Felis silvestris, Carnivora, Felidae). J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 47: 283–297.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hubbard, A.L., S. McOrist, T.W. Jones, R. Boid, R. Scott and N. Easterbee. 1992. Is survival of European wildcats Felis silvestris in Britain threatened by interbreeding with domestic cats? Biol. Conserv. 61: 203–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kitchener, C., N. Yamaguchi, J.M. Ward and D.W. Macdonald. 2005. A diagnosis for the Scottish wildcat (Felis silvestris): a tool for conservation action for a critically-endangered felid. Anim. Conserv. 8: 223–237.Google Scholar

  • Krüger, M., S. Hertwig, G. Jetschke and M.S. Fischer. 2009. Evaluation of anatomical characters and the question of hybridization with domestic cats in the wildcat population of Thuringia, Germany. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 47: 268–282.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lecis, R., M. Pierpaoli, S. Birò, L. Szemethy, B. Ragni, F. Vercillo and E. Randi. 2006. Bayesian analyses of admixture in wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) using linked microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. 15: 119–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • López-Martín, J.M., F.J. García, A. Such, E. Virgós, J. Lozano, J. Duarte and A.J. España. 2007. Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777. In: (L.J., Palomo, J. Gisbert and J.C. Blanco, eds.) Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Mamíferos Terrestres de España. DGB-SECEM-SECEMU, Madrid, Spain, pp. 336–338.Google Scholar

  • Lozano, J. and A.F. Malo. 2012. Conservation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Mediterranean environments: a reassessment of current threats. In: (G.S., Williams, ed.) Mediterranean ecosystems: dynamics, management and conservation. Nova Science Publishers Inc., Hauppauge, NY. pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

  • Lozano, J., E. Virgós, A.F. Malo, D.L. Huertas and J.G. Casanovas. 2003. Importance of scrub-pastureland mosaics for wild-living cats occurrence in a Mediterranean area: implications for the conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris). Biodivers. Conserv. 12: 921–935.Google Scholar

  • Lozano, J., E. Virgós, S. Cabezas-Díaz and J.G. Mangas. 2007. Increase of large game species in Mediterranean areas: is the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) facing a new threat? Biol. Conserv. 138: 321–329.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mendelssohn, H. 1999. The wildcat in Israel. Cat News 31: 21–22.Google Scholar

  • Nowell, K. and P. Jackson. 1996. Wild cats. Status survey and conservation action plan. UICN/SSC Cat Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar

  • Nussberger, B. 2012. Detecting introgression is important for wildcat conservation. Säugetierkundliche Informationen 8: 319–328.Google Scholar

  • Oliveira, R., R. Godinho, E. Randi and P.C. Alves. 2008a. Hybridization versus conservation: are domestic cats threatening the genetic integrity of wildcats (Felis silvestris silvestris) in Iberian Peninsula? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363: 2953–2961.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Oliveira, R., R. Godinho, E. Randi, N. Ferrand and P.C. Alves. 2008b. Molecular analysis of hybridisation between wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) in Portugal: implications for conservation. Conserv. Genet. 9: 1–11.Google Scholar

  • Parent, G.H. 1974. Plaidoyer pour le chat sylvestre ou dix excellentes raisons pour protéger cet animal malconnu en Belgique et ailleurs. Homme Nat. 10: 1–5.Google Scholar

  • Pierpaoli, M., Z.S. Birò, M. Herrmann, K. Hupe, M. Fernandes, B. Ragni, L. Szemethy and E. Randi. 2003. Genetic distinction of wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in Europe, and hybridization with domestic cats in Hungary. Mol. Ecol. 12: 2585–2598.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Platz, S., S. Hertwig, G. Jetschke, M. Krüger and M.S. Fischer. 2011. Comparative morphometric study of the Slovakian wildcat population (Felis silvestris silvestris): evidence for a low rate of introgression? Mamm. Biol. 76: 222–233.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Puzachenko, A.Y. 2002. Hybrid syndrome and method for identification of hybrids in museum collections of Felis silvestris and Felis lybica. Säugetierk. Inform. 26: 234–248.Google Scholar

  • Ragni, B. and M. Possenti. 1996. Variability of coat-colour and markings system in Felis silvestris. Ital. J. Zool. 63: 285–292.Google Scholar

  • Ragni, B. and E. Randi. 1986. Multivariate analysis of chraniometric characters in European wildcat, domestic cat and African wildcat (genus Felis). Z. Säugetierkd. 51: 243–251.Google Scholar

  • Randi, E., M. Pierpaoli, M. Beaumont and B. Ragni. 2001. Genetic identification of wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) and their hybrids using Bayesian clustering methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1679–1693.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Say, L., S. Devillard, F. Léger, D. Pontier and S. Ruette. 2012. Distribution and spatial genetic structure of European wildcat in France. Anim. Conserv. 15: 18–27.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stahl, P. and M. Artois. 1991. Status and conservation of the wild cat (Felis silvestris) in Europe and around the Mediterranean rim. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar

  • StatSoft Inc. 2001. STATISTICA for Windows, version 6.0. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK.Google Scholar

  • Stuart, C. and T. Stuart. 1991. The feral cat problem in southern Africa. Afr. Wild. 45: 13–15.Google Scholar

  • Virgós, E. and A. Travaini. 2005. Relationship between small-game hunting and carnivore diversity in central Spain. Biodivers. Conserv. 14: 3475–3486.Google Scholar

  • Virgós, E., J.L. Tellería and T. Santos. 2002. A comparison on the response to forest fragmentation by medium-sized Iberian carnivores in central Spain. Biodivers. Conserv. 11: 1063–1079.Google Scholar

  • Yamaguchi, N., A.C. Kitchener, C.A. Driscoll, J.M. Ward and D.W. Macdonald. 2004. Craniological differentiation amongst wild-living cats in Britain and southern Africa: natural variation or the effects of hybridization? Anim. Conserv. 7: 339–351.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Elena Ballesteros-Duperón, Environment and Water Agency of Andalusia, Regional Ministry of Environment of the Junta de Andalucía, C/Joaquina Eguaras, 10, E 18013 Granada, Spain, e-mail: ,

aPresent address: Department of Applied Biology, University Miguel Hernández, Ctra. Beniel km 3.2, 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.


Received: 2013-02-13

Accepted: 2014-02-11

Published Online: 2014-03-07

Published in Print: 2015-02-01


Citation Information: Mammalia, Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages 101–110, ISSN (Online) 1864-1547, ISSN (Print) 0025-1461, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2013-0026.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in