Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Mammalia

Editor-in-Chief: Denys, Christiane

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.805
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.000

CiteScore 2016: 0.89

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.469
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.711

Online
ISSN
1864-1547
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 69, Issue 2 (Jul 2005)

Issues

Dynamics of grouping patterns and social segregation in feral goats (Capra hircus) on the Isle of Rum, NW Scotland

Jianbin Shi / Robin I. M. Dunbar / David Buckland / David Miller
Published Online: 2007-07-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2005.016

We investigated group size, grouping patterns and sexual segregation in feral goats on the Isle of Rum (NW Scotland) from January 1981 to September 1982 and May to November 2000. A total of 7396 groups of feral goats were recorded, comprising 30356 adult individuals and 13119 yearlings and kids. The most commonly observed group size was 1-3 individuals. Mean group size was larger in 2000 than in 1981-82, possibly reflecting an increase in population size. In both study periods, group size varied throughout the year: mean group size was smallest in late winter and early spring, and increased through summer to reach a maximum during the August/September rutting period. Mixed-sex groups were larger than single sex groups. Feral goats on Rum showed obvious social segregation during late spring and summer months (April to July) as demonstrated by a lower percentage of mixed-sex groups, lower proportions of adult males and females observed in mixed-sex groups and a higher social segregation coefficient in these months. The extent to which the population became sexually segregated correlated most strongly with daylength. This probably reflects the goats' pattern of habitat use during foraging: large mixed sex parties, which use caves for overnight shelter, forage slowly up the hill sides during the day, gradually dispersing more widely as they go. In winter months, when days are short, the animals are able to move less far, and so become less dispersed.

Key Words: Group size,; grouping pattern,; sexual segregation,; feral goats,; Rum.

About the article

Published Online: 2007-07-06

Published in Print: 2005-07-01


Citation Information: Mammalia mamm, ISSN (Online) 1864-1547, ISSN (Print) 0025-1461, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2005.016.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Rivera-Sánchez Leidy, Cassinello Roldán Jorge, Baraza Ruíz Elena, and Bartolomé Filella Jordi
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2015, Volume 165, Page 81
[2]
Elodie F. Briefer and Alan G. McElligott
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2013, Volume 146, Number 1-4, Page 45
[4]
[5]
David A. Blank, Kathreen E. Ruckstuhl, and Weikang Yang
Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2012, Volume 90, Number 8, Page 955
[6]
Nina M. Keil, Sabrina Imfeld-Mueller, Janine Aschwanden, and Beat Wechsler
Animal Cognition, 2012, Volume 15, Number 5, Page 913
[7]
Elodie F. Briefer and Alan G. McElligott
Animal Behaviour, 2012, Volume 83, Number 4, Page 991
[8]
Sara Calhim, Jianbin Shi, and R.I.M. Dunbar
Animal Behaviour, 2006, Volume 72, Number 1, Page 31
[9]
K. E. Ruckstuhl and P. Neuhaus
Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2009, Volume 87, Number 2, Page 165
[10]
Christian Ramp, Wilhelm Hagen, Per Palsbøll, Martine Bérubé, and Richard Sears
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2010, Volume 64, Number 10, Page 1563
[13]
Robin I. M. Dunbar and Jianbin Shi
Ethology, 2008, Volume 114, Number 5, Page 444

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in