Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


Editor-in-Chief: Denys, Christiane

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.714
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.816

CiteScore 2017: 0.82

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.433
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.603

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 81, Issue 4


Social organization of an endangered subtropical species, Eumops floridanus, the Florida bonneted bat

Holly K. Ober / Elizabeth C. Braun de Torrez
  • Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jeffery A. Gore / Amanda M. Bailey
  • Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jennifer K. Myers / Kathleen N. Smith / Robert A. McCleery
  • Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-07-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2015-0183


Many Chiropteran species are gregarious, yet much remains to be learned about details of the sociality of most species. This is especially true for the endangered Eumops floridanus (Florida bonneted bat). Scant knowledge of the species’ natural history and ecological interactions has precluded the development of effective conservation strategies. We investigated several aspects of the social organization of E. floridanus roosting in bat houses in southwest Florida: group size, group composition, group stability, and seasonality of reproduction. Our findings suggest the species has characteristics more common to tropical bat species than temperate ones. The average roost size was 10 individuals, with colonies in a harem social structure all three times in the year they were assessed. Adults were much more likely than sub-adults to be recaptured at the same roosts during subsequent capture sessions. We suggest that the availability and distribution of roosts may alter the social structure of these bats and ultimately limit local populations. We did not find evidence of a distinct seasonal birthing period matching that of other temperate bat species. Results suggests the species is aseasonally polyestrous, making non-volant E. floridanus vulnerable to disturbance across a larger portion of the year than other bat species in the US.

Keywords: aseasonal polyestry; harem; reproduction; roost fidelity; social structure


  • Barbour, R.W. and W.H. Davis. 1969. Bats of America. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. pp. 286.Google Scholar

  • Barclay, R.M.R. and A. Kurta. 2007. Ecology and behavior of bats roosting in tree cavities and under bark. In: (M.J. Lacki, J.P. Hayes and A. Kurta, eds.) Bats in forests: conservation and management. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD. pp. 17–60.Google Scholar

  • Belwood, J.J. 1981. Wagner’s mastiff bat, Eumops glaucinus floridanus, (Molossidae) in southwestern Florida. J. Mammal. 62: 411–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Belwood, J.J. 1992. Florida Mastiff Bat, Eumops glaucinus floridanus. In: (S. Humphrey, ed.) Rare and endangered biota of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL. pp. 216–223.Google Scholar

  • Blumstein, D.T. 2010. Social behavior in conservation. In: (A.J. Moore, T. Szekely and J. Komdeur, eds.) Social behavior: genes, ecology, and evolution. Cambridge University Press, London. pp. 654–672.Google Scholar

  • Bowles, J.B., P.D. Heideman and K.R. Erickson. 1990. Observations on six species of free-tailed bats (Molossidae) from Yucatan, Mexico. Southwest. Nat. 35: 151–157.Google Scholar

  • Bradbury, J.W. and S.L. Vehrencamp. 1977. Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats, III. Mating systems. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2: 1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brooke, A.P. 1997. Social organization and foraging behavior of the fishing bat, Noctilio leporinus (Chiroptera: Noctilionidae). Ethology 103: 421–436.Google Scholar

  • Burns, L.E. and H.G. Broders. 2015. Who swarms with whom? Group dynamics of Myotis bats during autumn swarming. Behav. Ecol. 26: 866–876.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bury, R.B. 2006. Natural history, field ecology, conservation biology and wildlife management: time to connect the dots. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 1: 56–61.Google Scholar

  • Chaverri, G. and T.H. Kunz. 2010. Ecological determinants of social systems: perspectives on the functional role of roosting ecology in the social behavior of tent-roosting bats. In: (R. Macedo, ed.) Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 42. Academic Press, Burlington, VT. pp. 275–318.Google Scholar

  • Dayton, P.K. 2003. The importance of the natural sciences to conservation. Am. Nat. 162: 1–13.Google Scholar

  • Dechmann, D.K.N., B. Kranstauber, D. Gibbs and M. Wikelski. 2010. Group hunting – a reason for sociality in Molossid bats? PLoS One 5: e9012.Google Scholar

  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2011. Biological status review report for the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus). 2010. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, FL. pp. 11.Google Scholar

  • Gardner, A.L., R.K. LaVal and D.E. Wilson. 1970. The distributional status of some Costa Rican bats. J. Mammal. 51: 712–729.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gore, J.A., M.S. Robson, R. Zambrano and N.J. Douglass. 2015. Roosting sites of a Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus). Fla. Field Nat. 43: 179–184.Google Scholar

  • Heideman, P.D., K.R. Erickson and J.B. Bowles. 1990. Notes on the breeding biology, gular gland and roost habits of Molossus sinaloe (Chiroptera, Molossidae). Z. Saugetierkd. 55: 303–307.Google Scholar

  • IBM Corp. 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar

  • IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 08 February 2015.

  • Jennings, W.L. 1958. The ecological distribution of bats in Florida. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. pp. 125.Google Scholar

  • Jerrett, D.P. 1979. Female reproductive patterns in nonhibernating bats. J. Reprod. Fertil. 56: 369–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, J.S., J.N. Kropczynski and M.J. Lacki. 2013. Social network analysis and the study of sociality in bats. Acta Chirop. 15: 1–17.Google Scholar

  • Keeley, A.T.H. and B.W. Keeley. 2004. The mating system of Tadarida brasiliensis (Chiroptera: Molossidae) in a large highway bridge colony. J. Mammal. 85: 113–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kerth, G. 2008. Causes and consequences of sociality in bats. Bioscience 58: 737–746.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Krutzsch, P.H. 2000. Anatomy, physiology and cyclicity of the male reproductive tract. In: (E.G. Crichton and P.H. Krutzsch, eds.) Reproductive biology of bats. Academic Press, New York, NY. pp. 91–155.Google Scholar

  • Krutzsch, P.H. and E.G. Crichton. 1990. Observations on the reproductive anatomy of the male Molossus fortis (Chiroptera: Molossidae) with comments on the chronology of reproductive events. Mammalia 54: 287–296.Google Scholar

  • Krutzsch, P.H., T.H. Fleming and E.G. Crichton. 2002. Reproductive biology of male Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis mexicana). J. Mammal. 83: 489–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCracken, G.F. and G.S. Wilkinson. 2000. Bat mating systems. In: (E.G. Crichton and P.H. Krutzsch, eds.) Reproductive biology of bats. Academic Press, New York, NY. pp. 321–362.Google Scholar

  • McWilliam, A.N. 1988. Social organisation of the bat Tadarida (Chaerephon) pumila (Chiroptera: Molossidae) in Ghana, West Africa. Ethology 77: 115–124.Google Scholar

  • Myers, P. and R.M. Wetzel. 1983. Systematics and zoogeography of the bats of the Chaco Boreal. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., Univ. Michigan 165: 1–59.Google Scholar

  • R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar

  • Racey, P.A. 2009. Reproductive assessment of bats. In: (T.H. Kunz and S. Parsons, eds.) Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats, 2nd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. pp. 249–264.Google Scholar

  • Racey, P.A. and A.C. Entwistle. 2003. Conservation ecology of bats. In: (T.H. Kunz and M.B. Fenton, eds.) Bat ecology University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. pp. 680–743.Google Scholar

  • Robson, M.S., F.J. Mazzotti and T. Parrott. 1989. Recent evidence of the mastiff bat in southern Florida. Fla. Field. Nat. 17: 81–82.Google Scholar

  • RStudio. 2013. RStudio: Integrated development environment for R (Version 0.97.551). Boston, MA.Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, A. 1952. The land mammals of southern Florida and the upper Florida Keys. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. pp. 189.Google Scholar

  • Sikes, R.S., W.L. Gannon and Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. 2011. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 92: 235–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silva Taboada, G. 1979. Los murciélagos de Cuba. Academia de Ciencias de Cuba, Habana, Cuba. pp. 423.Google Scholar

  • Silvis, A., W.M. Ford, E.R. Britzke and J.B. Johnson. 2014. Association, roost use and simulated disruption of Myotis septentrionalis maternity colonies. Behav. Processes 103: 283–290.Google Scholar

  • Smith, K.N. 2010. First capture of a Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) in a mist net. Unpublished report. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Big Cypress, FL.Google Scholar

  • Timm, R.M. and H.H. Genoways. 2004. The Florida bonneted bat, Eumops floridanus (Chiroptera: Molossidae): Distribution, morphometrics, systematics, and ecology. J. Mammal. 85: 852–865.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2013. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: endangered species status for the Florida Bonneted Bat. Federal Register 78: 61004–61043.Google Scholar

  • Weckerly, F.W. 1998. Sexual-size dimorphism: influence of mass and mating systems in the most dimorphic mammals. J. Mammal. 79: 33–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilkinson, G.S. and G.F. McCracken. 2003. Bats and balls: sexual selection and sperm competition. In (T.H. Kunz and M.B. Fenton, eds.) Bat ecology University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. pp. 128–155.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-01-12

Accepted: 2016-06-08

Published Online: 2016-07-14

Published in Print: 2017-07-26

Citation Information: Mammalia, Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages 375–383, ISSN (Online) 1864-1547, ISSN (Print) 0025-1461, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2015-0183.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Elizabeth C. Braun De Torrez, Steve T. Samoray, Kirk A. Silas, Megan A. Wallrichs, Mark W. Gumbert, Holly K. Ober, and Robert A. Mccleery
Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2017, Volume 41, Number 2, Page 322

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in