Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Mammalia

Editor-in-Chief: Denys, Christiane

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.805
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.000

CiteScore 2016: 0.89

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.469
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.711

Online
ISSN
1864-1547
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 81, Issue 5 (Aug 2017)

Issues

White-lipped peccaries are recorded at Iguaçu National Park after 20 years

Carlos R. Brocardo
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Ecology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 24 Av, 1515, Rio Claro, São Paulo 13.506-900, Brazil
  • Neotropical Institute - Research and Conservation, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marina Xavier da Silva / Luis Eduardo da S. Delgado / Mauro Galetti
  • Department of Ecology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 24 Av, 1515, Rio Claro, São Paulo 13.506-900, Brazil
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-10-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2016-0049

Abstract

The white-lipped peccary (WLP) is the most endangered ungulate in the Neotropics. In the recent years, this species has undergone a large reduction in range size and experienced the loss of several populations. An emblematic case was the local extinction of this species from the Iguaçu National Park (INP) in the mid-1990s. After the report of this particular WLP disappearance, surveys conducted along the 2000s confirmed its absence in the park. However, in 2016, after 20 years of previous reports, we obtained five records of WLP herds, indicating a possible population recovery probably resulting from emigration. To effectively re-establish white-lipped peccary population and, consequently, restore its ecological role, urgent practical conservation measures are necessary.

Keywords: Atlantic Forest; Tayassu pecari; Tayassuidae; ungulate

References

  • Altrichter, M., A. Taber, H. Beck, R. Reyna-Hurtado, L. Lizarraga, A. Keuroghlian and E.W. Sanderson. 2012. Range-wide declines of a key Neotropical ecosystem architect, the Near Threatened white-lipped peccary Tayassu pecari. Oryx 46: 87–98.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Azevedo, F.C.C. 2008. Food habits and livestock depredation of sympatric jaguars and pumas in the Iguaçu national park area, South Brazil. Biotropica 40: 494–500.Google Scholar

  • Azevedo, F.C.C. and V.A. Conforti. 2008. Decline of peccaries in a protected subtropical forest of Brazil: toward conservation issues. Mammalia 72: 82–88.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Beck, H. 2005. Seed predation and dispersal by peccaries throughout the Neotropics and its consequences: a review and synthesis. In: (P. Forget, J. Lambert, P. Hulme and S. Vander Wall, eds.) Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CAB International Wallingford, UK. pp. 77–115.Google Scholar

  • Biondo, C., A. Keuroghlian, J. Gongora and C.Y. Miyaki. 2011. Population genetic structure and dispersal in white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari) from the Brazilian Pantanal. J. Mamm. 92: 267–274.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Brocardo, C.R. 2013. Cascavel: origem e história do município. Boletim do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico do Paraná 66: 250–272.Google Scholar

  • Brocardo, C.R. and J.F. Cândido-Jr. 2012. Persistência de mamíferos de médio e grande porte em fragmentos de Floresta Ombrófila Mista no estado do Paraná, Brasil. Rev. Árvore 36: 301–310.Google Scholar

  • Brocardo, C.R. and L. Delgado. 2014. Records and conservation of white-lipped peccary in the region of Iguaçu National Park, Brazil. Suiform Soundings 13: 38–43.Google Scholar

  • Brocardo, C.R., R. Rodarte, R.d.S. Bueno, L. Culot and M. Galetti. 2012. Mamíferos não voadores do Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho, Continuum florestal do Paranapiacaba. Biota Neotropica 12: 198–208.Google Scholar

  • Brocardo, C.R., V.B. Zipparro, R.A.F. de Lima, R. Guevara and M. Galetti. 2013. No changes in seedling recruitment when terrestrial mammals are excluded in a partially defaunated Atlantic rainforest. Biol. Cons. 163: 107–114.Google Scholar

  • Crawshaw, J.R., P.G., J. Mahler, C. Indrusiak, S.M. Cavalcanti, M.R.P. Leite-Pitman and K.M. Silvius. 2004. Ecology and conservation of the jaguar (Panthera onca) in Iguaçu National Park, Brazil. In: (K.M. Silvius, R.E. Bodmer and J.M.V. Fragoso, eds.) People in nature: wildlife conservation in South and Central America. Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 286–296.Google Scholar

  • Fragoso, R., L. Delgado and L. Lopes. 2011. Aspectos da atividade de caça no Parque Nacional do Iguaçu, Paraná. Rev. Biol. Neotrop 8: 41–52.Google Scholar

  • Galetti, M., H.C. Giacomini, R.S. Bueno, C.S.S. Bernardo, R.M. Marques, R.S. Bovendorp, C.E. Steffler, P. Rubim, S.K. Gobbo, C.I. Donatti, R.A. Begotti, F. Meirelles, R.d.A. Nobre, A.G. Chiarello and C.A. Peres. 2009. Priority areas for the conservation of Atlantic forest large mammals. Biol. Cons. 142: 1229–1241.Google Scholar

  • Galetti, M., E. Eizirik, B. Beisiegel, K.t. Ferraz, S. Cavalcanti, A.C. Srbek-Araujo, P. Crawshaw, A. Paviolo, P.M. Galetti and M.L. Jorge. 2013. Atlantic rainforest’s jaguars in decline. Science 342: 930–930.Google Scholar

  • Galetti, M., R.S. Bovendorp and R. Guevara. 2015a. Defaunation of large mammals leads to an increase in seed predation in the Atlantic forests. Global Ecol. Cons. 3: 824–830.Google Scholar

  • Galetti, M., R. Guevara, C.L. Neves, R.R. Rodarte, R.S. Bovendorp, M. Moreira, J.B. Hopkins and J.D. Yeakel. 2015b. Defaunation affects the populations and diets of rodents in Neotropical rainforests. Biol. Cons. 190: 2–7.Google Scholar

  • Jorge, M.L.S.P., M. Galetti, M.C. Ribeiro and K.M.P.M.B. Ferraz. 2013. Mammal defaunation as surrogate of trophic cascades in a biodiversity hotspot. Biol. Cons. 163: 49–57.Google Scholar

  • Kasper, C.B., F.D. Mazim, J.B. Soares, T.G. de Oliveira and M.E. Fabián. 2007. Composiçãoo e abundância relativa dos mamíferos de médio e grande porte no Parque Estadual do Turvo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Zool. 24: 1087–1100.Google Scholar

  • Keuroghlian, A. and D. Eaton. 2009. Removal of palm fruits and ecosystem engineering in palm stands by white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari) and other frugivores in an isolated Atlantic Forest fragment. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 1733–1750.Google Scholar

  • Keuroghlian, A., D.P. Eaton and W.S. Longland. 2004. Area use by white-lipped and collared peccaries (Tayassu pecari and Tayassu tajacu) in a tropical forest fragment. Biol. Cons. 120: 411–425.Google Scholar

  • Keuroghlian, A., A.L.J. Desbiez, B. de Mello Beisiegel, E.P. Medici, A. Gatti, A.R.M. Pontes, C.B. de Campos, C.F. de Tófoli, E.A.M. Júnior and F.C. de Azevedo. 2012. Avaliação do risco de extinção do queixada Tayassu pecari Link, 1795, no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira: 84–102.Google Scholar

  • Keuroghlian, A., A. Desbiez, R. Reyna-Hurtado, M. Altrichter, H. Beck, A. Taber and J.M.V. Fragoso. 2013. Tayassu pecari. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T41778A44051115.Google Scholar

  • Paviolo, A., C.D. De Angelo, Y.E. Di Blanco and M.S. Di Bitetti. 2008. Jaguar Panthera onca population decline in the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest of Argentina and Brazil. Oryx 42: 554–561.Google Scholar

  • Silman, M.R., J.W. Terborgh and R.A. Kiltie. 2003. Population regulation of a dominant rain forest tree by a major seed predator. Ecology 84: 431–438.Google Scholar

  • Silva, M.X.d. 2014. Efetividade de áreas protegidas para conservação da biodiversidade: padrões de ocupação de mamíferos no Parque Nacional do Iguaçu. Ecologia. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. pp. 51.Google Scholar

  • Silva, M.X.d., C.R. Brocardo, A. Rodrigues and A. Vogliotti. 2013. Large predators and livestock activities in the region of Iguaçu National Park. In: (T.C. Magro, L.M. Rodrigues, D.F.d. Silva Filho, J.L. Polizel and J. Leahy, eds.) Protected Areas and Place Making: How do we provide conservation, landscape management, tourism, human health and regional development? Forestry Science Department – ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba. pp. 168–171.Google Scholar

  • TEAM Network. 2011. Terrestrial Vertebrate Protocol Implementation Manual. Tropical Ecology, Assessment and Monitoring Network, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-04-12

Accepted: 2016-08-26

Published Online: 2016-10-08

Published in Print: 2017-08-28


Citation Information: Mammalia, ISSN (Online) 1864-1547, ISSN (Print) 0025-1461, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2016-0049.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in