Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


Editor-in-Chief: Denys, Christiane

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.714
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.816

CiteScore 2017: 0.82

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.433
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.603

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 82, Issue 1


Surface foraging in Scapanus moles

Vladimir Dinets
Published Online: 2017-01-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2016-0091


Some mole genera, including Scapanus of western North America, are usually considered to be fully fossorial. I present data showing that surface foraging is used by adults of all four Scapanus species, and evidence that such foraging is not a particularly rare behavior. Scapanus moles forage on the surface when leaf litter is wet and does not produce much noise; they also move slowly, remain within a small area, and usually forage in places with dense cover. These adaptations decrease the risk of predation and make surface foraging behavior difficult to detect for human observers. Numerous unpublished and a few published observations suggest that many, if not all, species in other “fully fossorial” mole genera forage on the surface at least occasionally. This is true not just for true moles (Talpidae), but also for unrelated, but convergently similar golden (Chrysotalpidae) and marsupial (Notoryctidae) moles. Apparently, surface foraging is too important for fossorial insectivores to be completely lost even in the most fossorial taxa.

Keywords: behavior; behavioral ecology; fossoriality; Talpidae; true moles


  • Abe, N. 1971. [Ecology of Mogera wogura (Talpidae) and its control]. Shokubutsu Boeki [Plant Protection] 31: 5–15.Google Scholar

  • Aplin, K.P. 2015. Family Notoryctidae (marsupial moles). In: (D.E. Wilson and R.A. Mittermeier, eds.) Handbook of the mammals of the world (Vol. 5. Monotremes and marsupials). Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain. pp. 210–221.Google Scholar

  • Bannikova, A.A., E.D. Zemlemerova, P. Colangelo, M. Sözen. M. Sevindik, A.A. Kidov, R.I. Dzuev, B. Kryštufek and V.S. Lebedev. 2015a. An underground burst of diversity–a new look at the phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Talpa Linnaeus, 1758 (Mammalia: Talpidae) as revealed by nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 175: 930–948.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bannikova, A.A., E.D. Zemlemerova, V.S. Lebedev, D.Y. Aleksandrov, Y. Fang and B.I. Sheftel. 2015b. Phylogenetic position of the Gansu mole Scapanulus oweni Thomas, 1912 and the relationships between strictly fossorial tribes of the family Talpidae. Doklady Biol. Sci. 464: 230–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berg, R.E. and D.G. Stork. 2005. The physics of sound. 3rd edition. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar

  • Brzeziński, M. 1994. Summer diet of the sable Martes zibellina in the Middle Yenisei taiga, Siberia. Acta Theriol. 39: 103–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carmona, F.D., M. Glösmann, J. Ou, R. Jiménez and J.M. Collinson. 2009. Retinal development and function in a “blind” mole. Proc. Royal Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 277: 1513–1522.Google Scholar

  • Carraway, L.N., L.F. Alexander and B.J. Verts. 1993. Scapanus townsendii. Mamm. Species 434: 1–7.Google Scholar

  • Christian, J.J. 1950. Behavior of the mole (Scalopus) and the shrew (Blarina). J. Mamm. 31: 281–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dalquest, W.W. 1948. Mammals of Washington. University of Kansas Publ., Museum of Natural History, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.Google Scholar

  • Dinets, V. 2015. Peterson guide to finding mammals in North America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, USA.Google Scholar

  • Dinets, V. and E. Rotshild. 1996. [Mammals of Russia]. ABF, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar

  • Elford, C.R. 1970. Climate of California. Environmental Data Service, US Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar

  • Giger, R.D. 1965. Surface activity of moles as indicated by remains in barn owl pellets. Murrelet 46: 32–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glösmann, M., M. Steiner, L. Peichl and P.K. Ahnelt. 2008. Cone photoreceptors and potential UV vision in a subterranean insectivore, the European mole. J. Vision 8: 23–28.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Godfrey, G. and P. Crowford. 1960. The life of the mole. Museum Press, London, UK.Google Scholar

  • Gorman, M.C. and R.D. Stone. 1990. The natural history of moles. Christopher Helm, London, UK.Google Scholar

  • Howell, A.B. 1922. Surface wanderings of fossorial mammals. J. Mamm. 3: 19–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • IUCN. 2015. The IUCN Red List of threatened species version 2015–4, http://www.iucnredlist.org/.

  • Kott, O., R. Šumbera and P. Němec. 2010. Light perception in two strictly subterranean rodents: life in the dark or blue? PLoS One 5: e11810.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maser, C. and E.D. Brodie. 1966. A study of owl pellet contents from Linn, Benton and Polk Counties, Oregon. Murrelet 47: 9–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mason, M.J. and P.M. Narins. 2001. Seismic signal use by fossorial mammals. Amer. Zoologist 41: 1171–1184.Google Scholar

  • Mellanby, K. 1971. The mole. Collins, London, UK.Google Scholar

  • Morris, P. 1966. The mole as a surface dweller. J. Zool. 149: 46–49.Google Scholar

  • Motokawa, M. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships within the family Talpidae (Mammalia: Insectivora). J. Zool. 263: 147–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naughton, D. 2012. Natural history of Canadian mammals. Canadian Museum of Nature and University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar

  • Nowak, R.M. 1999. Walker’s mammals of the world (Vol. 1). John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.Google Scholar

  • Ognev, S.I. 1928. [Mammals of Eastern Europe and Northern Asia] (Vol. 1). Glavnauka, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar

  • Pedersen, R.J. 1963. The life history and ecology of Townsend’s mole (Scapanus townsendii Bachman) in Tillamook County, Oregon. M.S. thesis, Oregon State University. Corvallis, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar

  • Reid, F.A. 2006. A field guide to mammals of North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, USA.Google Scholar

  • Scheffer, T.H. 1949. Ecological comparisons of three genera of moles. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 52: 30–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, A.T. and Y. Xie (Eds.). 2013. Mammals of China. Princeton University Press, USA.Google Scholar

  • Stephens, F. 1906. California mammals. The West Coast Publishing Co, North Hollywood, California, USA.Google Scholar

  • Verts, B.J. and L.N. Carraway. 2001. Scapanus latimanus. Mamm. Species 666: 1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whitaker, J.O., Jr. 1996. National Audubon Society field guide to North American mammals. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, USA.Google Scholar

  • Yates, T.L. and J. Salazar-Bravo. 2005. A revision of Scapanus latimanus, with the revalidation of a species of Mexican mole. In: (V. Sánchez-Cordero and R. Medellín, eds.) Contribuciones mastozoológicas en homenaje a Bernardo Villa. Instituto de Biología e Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México. pp. 479–496.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-07-03

Accepted: 2016-11-29

Published Online: 2017-01-20

Published in Print: 2017-12-20

Citation Information: Mammalia, Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 48–53, ISSN (Online) 1864-1547, ISSN (Print) 0025-1461, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2016-0091.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Dinets Vladimir and Hall Jon
International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 2018, Volume 10, Number 4, Page 154

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in