It is well known that the Bernoulli polynomials are defined by the generating function
When x = 0, Bn = Bn (0) are called the Bernoulli numbers. From (1), we note that
where δn k is the Kronecker’s symbol.
In , L. Carlitz considered the degenerate Bernoulli polynomials which are given by the generating function
Thus, by (5), we get
By (4), we get
From (7), we have
Now, we consider the degenerate Bernoulli polynomials which are different from the degenerate Bernoulli polynomials of L. Carlitz as follows:
When x = 0, bn, λ = bn, λ (0) are called the degenerate Bernoulli numbers.
Note. The degenerate Bernoulli polynomials are also called Daehee polynomials with λ-parameter (see ).
From (10), we note that
The classical polylogarithm function Lik (x) is defined by
It is known that the poly-Bernoulli polynomials are defined by the generating function
When k = 1, we have
By (14), we easily get
Let x = 0. Then are called the poly-Bernoulli numbers.
In this paper, we introduce the new fully degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials and inverstigate some properties of these polynomials and numbers. From our investigation, we derive some identities for the fully degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials.
2 Fully degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials
For k ∈ ℤ, we define the fully degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials which are given by the generating function
Thus, we get
By (15), we get
Thus, from (18), we have
For k ∈ ℤ, ≥ 0, we have
From (15), we can derive the following equation:
Thus, by (21), we get
where S2 (n, l) and S1 (n, l) are the Stirling numbers of the second kind and of the first kind, respectively. Therefore, by (22), we obtain the following theorem.
For k ∈ ℤ, n ≥ 1, we have
From (12), we can easily derive the following equation:
Thus, by (23), the generating function of the fully degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers is also written in terms of the following iterated integral:
For k = 2, we have
Therefore, by (25), we obtain the following theorem.
For n ≥ 0, we have
From (15), we have
Therefore, by (26), we obtain the following theorem.
For n ≥ 0, we have
From (23), we have
On the other hand,
Thus, by (29), we have
Therefore, by (30), we obtain the following theorem
For n ≥ 1, we have
Now, we observe that
By (31), we get
Therefore, by (32), we obtain the following theorem.
For k ∈ ℤ and n ≥ 0, we have
From Theorem 2.1, we have
The generalized falling factorial (x | λ)n is given by
As is well known, the Bernoulli numbers of the second kind are defined by the generating funcdtion
We observe that
On the other hand,
By Theorem 2.1, we get
3 Further remarks
Let ℂ be complex number field and let be the set of all formal power series in the variable t over ℂ with
Let ℙ be the algebra of polynomials in a single variable x over ℂ and let ℙ* be the vector space of all linear functionals on ℙ. The action of linear functional L ∈ ℙ* on a polynomial p (x) is denoted by 〈L| p (x)〉, and linearly extended as
where c, c′ ∈ ℂ.
For , we define a linear functional on ℙ by setting
Thus, by (39), we get
For , by (40), we get 〈fL (i)| xn〉 = 〈L| xn〉. In addition, the mapping L ↦ fL (t) is a vector space isomorphism from ℙ* onto . Henceforth, denotes both the algebra of the formal power series in t and the vector space of all linear functionals on ℙ and so an element f (i) of can be regarded as both a formal power series and a linear functional. We refer to umbral algebra. The umbral calculus is the study of umbral algebra (see [5, 15, 20]). The order o (f (i)) of the non-zero power series f (i) is the smallest integer k for which the coefficient of tk does not vanish.
If o (f (t)) = 1(respectively, o (f (t)) = 0), then f (t) is called a delta (respectively, an invertible) series (see ). For o (f (t)) = 1 and o (g (t)) = 0, there exists a unique sequence sn (x) of polynomials such that 〈g(t) f (t)k| sn (x〉 = n!δn, k, (n, k ≥ 0).
The sequence sn (x) is called the Sheffer sequence for (g (t), f (t)), and we write sn (x) ~ (g (t), f (t)) (see ).
Let f (t) ∈ and p (x) ∈ ℙ. Then, by (40), we get
From (41), we have
By (42), we easily get
From (43), we have
Let f (t) be the linear functional such that
for all polynomials p (x). Then it can be determined by (41) to be
Thus, for p (x) ∈ ℙ, we have
It is known that
Thus, by (48),
On the other hand,
For n ∈ ℕ, we have
By (46), we get
From (51), we have
Thus, by (52), we get
Therefore, by (53), we obtain the following theorem.,
For n ≥ 0 we have
For p(x) ∈ ℙn with , we have
From (48), we note that
Therefore, by (56), we obtain the following theorem.
Araci S., Acikgoz M., Kilicman A., Extended p-adic q-invariant integrals on ℤp associated with applications of umbral calculus, Adv. Difference Equ., 2013, 2013:96, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Carlitz L., Degenerate Stirling, Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers, Utilitas Math., 1979, 15, 51–88. Google Scholar
Dere R., Simsek Y., Applications of umbral algebra to some special polynomials, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang), 2012, 22, 433–438.Google Scholar
Dere R., Simsek Y., Hermite base Bernoulli type polynomials on the umbral algebra, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2015, 22, 1–5. Google Scholar
Ding D., Yang J., Some identities related to the Apostol-Euler and Apostol-Bernoulli polynomials, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang), 2010, 20, 7–21.Google Scholar
Gaboury S., Tremblay R., and B.-J. Fugere, Some explicit formulas for certain new classes of Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc., 2014, 17, 97–104.Google Scholar
He Y., Zhang W., A convolution formula for Bernoulli polynomials, Ars Combin., 2013, 108, 97–104.Google Scholar
Kaneko M., Masanobu poly-Bernoulli numbers, J Théor. Nombres Bordeaux, 1997, 9, 221–228.Google Scholar
Kim D., Kim T., A note on poly-Bernoulli and higher-order poly-Bernoulli polynomials, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2015, 22, 26–33.Google Scholar
Kim D. S., Kim T., Higher-order Cauchy of the first kind and poly-Cauchy of the first kind mixed type polynomials, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang), 2013, 23, 621–636. Google Scholar
Kim D. S., Kim T., Higher-order Frobenius-Euler and poly-Bernoulli mixed-type polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ., 2013, 2013:251, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Kim D. S., Kim T., Daehee polynomials with q-parameter, Adv. Studies Theor. Phys., 2014, 8, 561–569. Google Scholar
Kim D. S., Kim T., Mansour T., and Dolgy D. V., On poly-Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind with umbral calculus viewpoint, Adv. Difference Equ., 2015, 2015:27, 13 pp. Google Scholar
Kim T., Barnes’ type multiple degenerate Bernoulli and Euler polynomials, Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 258, 556–564. Google Scholar
Kim T. and Mansour T., Umbral calculus associated with Frobenius-type Eulerian polynomials, Russ. J. Math. Phys., 2014, 21, 484–493.Google Scholar
Luo Q.-M., Some recursion formula and relations for Bernoulli numbers and Euler numbers of higher order, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang), 2005, 10, 63–70.Google Scholar
Ozden H., Simsek Y., Srivastava H. M., A unified presentation of the generating functions of the generalized Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials, Comput. Math. Appl., 2010, 60, 2779–2787.Google Scholar
Qi F., An integral representation, complete monotonicity, and inequalities of Cauchy numbers of the second kind, J. Number Theory, 2014, 144, 244–255.Google Scholar
Roman S., The umbral calculus, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 111, Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York, 1984. Google Scholar
Sen E., Theokind on Apostol-Euler polynomials of higher order arising from Euler basis, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang), 2013, 23, 337–345.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2016-07-26
Published in Print: 2016-01-01
Citation Information: Open Mathematics, Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 545–556, ISSN (Online) 2391-5455, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2016-0048.
© 2016 Kim et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0