Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Medicine

formerly Central European Journal of Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Darzynkiewicz, Zbigniew

1 Issue per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016 (Open Medicine): 0.294
IMPACT FACTOR 2016 (Central European Journal of Medicine): 0.116

CiteScore 2017: 0.53

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.154
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.264

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-5463
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 3, Issue 3

Issues

Volume 10 (2015)

Spinal meningiomas: Clinical and therapeutic tonsiderations

Johannes Schröder / Bernhard Fischer / Stefan Palkovic / Hansdetlef Wassmann
Published Online: 2008-07-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-008-0045-7

Abstract

Meningiomas of the spinal canal are rare, in contrast to their cranial counterparts. This study reports on the dominant features of spinal meningiomas before and after treatment. We treated 30 patients (23 female) with meningiomas of the spinal canal from 1992 to 2003. The mean age was 68 (range: 43–91). Upon admission, 26 patients presented with a marked neurological deficit (11 paraparesis, 9 motor weakness, 4 myelopathic ataxia, 1 quadriplegia, and 1 cauda equina syndrome). Two patients had sensory deficits, and two had pain only. The distribution of the tumors was as follows: 8 cases were cranio-cervical, 1 case was cervical, 6 cases were at the cervico-thoracic junction, 9 cases were of the thoracic spine, 5 cases were of the thoracolumbar spine, and 1 case was of the lumbar spine. Five cases also had intracranial manifestations. The mean interval between the onset of the first symptoms and treatment was 12 months. All cases were treated via (hemi)-laminectomy for complete removal of the tumor and occasionally via duraplasty. After a mean follow-up of 3 years, symptoms had improved by 3 points (on a 5-point scale) in 3 cases, by 2 points in 7 cases, and by 1 point in 12 cases; 7 cases were unchanged, and 1 case had worsened by 1 point. We observed 3 local recurrences. One case developed manifestations at a different site. Spinal meningiomas are often diagnosed late, after they have already caused major neurological deficits. Nevertheless, owing to their benign character, the outcome is favorable when treated appropriately. The outcome depends above all on the initial neurological status. The worse the deficit is, the less probable it is that the patient will recover neurologically.

Keywords: Spinal; Meningioma; Treatment; Surgical

  • [1] Saito T., Arizono T., Maeda T., Terada K., Iwamoto Y., A novel technique for surgical resection of spinal meningioma, Spine, 2001, 26, 1805–1808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200108150-00017CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] King A.T., Sharr M.M., Gullan R.W., Bartlett J.R., Spinal meningiomas: a 20-year review, Br.J Neurosurg, 1998, 12, 521–526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02688699844367CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Gezen F., Kahraman S., Canakci Z., Beduk A., Review of 36 cases of spinal cord meningioma, Spine, 2000, 25, 727–731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200003150-00013CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Klekamp J. and Samii M., Surgical results for spinal meningiomas.[comment], Surg Neurol., 1999, 52, 552–562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(99)00153-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Qasho R., Lunardi P., Lo B.F., di Stefano M., Lo B., Rare combination of spinal lesions and subcutaneous meningioma in a 44 year old man, J Neurooncol., 1998, 38, 77–82 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005981110128CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Klekamp J. and Samii M., Introduction of a score system for the clinical evaluation of patients with spinal processes, Acta Neurochir.(Wien), 1993, 123, 221–223 Google Scholar

  • [7] Roux F.X., Nataf F., Pinaudeau M., Borne G., Devaux B., Meder J.F., Intraspinal meningiomas: review of 54 cases with discussion of poor prognosis factors and modern therapeutic management. [Review], Surg Neurol., 1996, 46, 458–463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(96)00199-1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Solero C.L., Fornari M., Giombini S., Lasio G., Oliveri G., Cimino C., et al, Spinal meningiomas: review of 174 operated cases, Neurosurgery, 1989, 25, 153–160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006123-198908000-00001CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Schaller B. and Schaller B., Spinal meningioma: relationship between histological subtypes and surgical outcome?, J Neurooncol., 2005, 75, 157–161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-005-1469-4CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Cohen-Gadol A.A., Zikel O.M., Koch C.A., Scheithauer B.W., Krauss W.E., Cohen-Gadol A.A., et al, Spinal meningiomas in patients younger than 50 years of age: a 21-year experience, J.Neurosurg., 2003, 98, 258–263 Google Scholar

  • [11] Schick U., Marquardt G., Lorenz R., Recurrence of benign spinal neoplasms, Neurosurg.Rev., 2001, 24, 20–25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00011961CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Morandi X., Haegelen C., Riffaud L., Amlashi S., Adn M., Brassier G., et al, Results in the operative treatment of elderly patients with spinal meningiomas, Spine, 2004, 29, 2191–2194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000141173.79572.40CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2008-07-10

Published in Print: 2008-09-01


Citation Information: Open Medicine, Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 322–326, ISSN (Online) 2391-5463, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-008-0045-7.

Export Citation

© 2008 Versita Warsaw. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in