Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Medicine

formerly Central European Journal of Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Darzynkiewicz, Zbigniew

1 Issue per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016 (Open Medicine): 0.294
IMPACT FACTOR 2016 (Central European Journal of Medicine): 0.116

CiteScore 2016: 0.28

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.140
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.154

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-5463
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 6, Issue 6 (Dec 2011)

Issues

Current approach to episiotomy: Inevitable or unnecessary?

Nebojsa Jovanovic
  • Clinical Center of Serbia, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr Koste Todorovića 26, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Dusica Kocijancic
  • Clinical Center of Serbia, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr Koste Todorovića 26, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Milan Terzic
  • Clinical Center of Serbia, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr Koste Todorovića 26, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotića 8, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-10-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-011-0088-z

Abstract

An episiotomy is a surgical incision through the perineum made to provide sufficient area for the delivery of the infant. About 10 to 95% of women who deliver will have episiotomy depending on which part of the world they are having delivery.

Too early episiotomy causes extensive bleeding and too late episiotomy causes the excessive stretching of a pelvic floor and lacerations could not be prevented.

According to widely accepted arguments, there are many benefits of episiotomy for the neonate: prevention of injuries, shoulder dystocia and mental retardation of the infant. Benefits for the mother are: reduction of severe lacerations, prevention of sexual dysfunction, prevention of urinary and fecal incontinence. But those things could also be complications of episiotomy, if it is being used nonrestrictively. Some other complications are also extensive bleeding, hematoma or infection.

There are many different opinions in literature about using episiotomy restrictively or routinely, so it is the right doubt arisen: is it inevitable or unnecessary?

There is a wide variation in episiotomy practice, and the decision of performing it or not depends of actual clinical situation.

There is still a great need for continuous obstetrics education according to the evidence based guidelines for the patient’s safety.

Keywords: Episiotomy; Controversy; Risks; Benefits; Complications

  • [1] Jevremovic M, Terzic M. Contemporary menagement of delivery. In: Bojovic S. (Editor): Human reproduction. Scientific book, Belgrade, 2003, pp. 912–927 Google Scholar

  • [2] Allen RE, Hanson RW Jr. Episiotomy in low-risk vaginal deliveries. J Am Board Fam Pract 2005;18:8–12 http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.18.1.8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] ACOG Practice Bulletin. Episiotomy. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:957–962 Google Scholar

  • [4] Gabbe SG, DeLee JB. The prophylactic forceps operation.1920. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:254–255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.123205CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Woolley RJ. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995;50:806–820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199511000-00020CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Lappen R. J, Gossett R. Changes in episiotomy practice: evidence-based medicine in action. Expert Rev of Obstet Gynecol. 2010;5: 301–309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/eog.10.21CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Shiono P, Klebanoff MA, Carey JC. Midline episiotomies: more harm than good? Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:765–770 Google Scholar

  • [8] Labrecque M, Bailargeon L, Daillaire M, Trembley A, Pinault JJ, Gingras S. Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparaous women. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 156: 797–802 Google Scholar

  • [9] Fritel X, Schaal JP, Fauconnier A, Bertrand V, Levet C, Pigné A. Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;115:247–252 Google Scholar

  • [10] Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J, Lohr N.K Outcomes of Routine Episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:2141–2148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.17.2141CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Ramin SM, Gilstrap LC III. Episiotomy and early repair of dehiscence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994;37:816–823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003081-199412000-00006CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Jovanovic N, Terzic M, Dotlic J, Aleksic S. Prevention of Postpartal Endometritis: Antibiotic of Choice. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2009; 137:506–510 http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/SARH0910506JCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Zizic V, Plecas D, Velimirovic M, Terzic M. The most frequent bacteriologic causes of puerperal infection. Giorn Mal Inf Parass 1990; 42:563–564 Google Scholar

  • [14] Ugwumadu A, Manyonda I, Reid F, Hay P. Effect of early oral clindamycin on late miscarriage and preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with abnormal vaginal flora and bacterial vaginosis: a andomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2003; 361: 983–988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12823-1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Rorbye C, Petersen IS, Nilas L. Postpartum Clostridium sordellii infection associated with fatal toxic shock syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:1134–1135 Google Scholar

  • [16] Morris WE, Fernández-Miyakawa ME. Toxins of Clostridium perfringens. Rev Argent Microbiol 2009; 41:251–260 PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Langer B, Minetti A. Immediate and long term complications of episiotomy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2006; 35:1S59–1S67 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Dinulović D, Terzić M. Injuries of the birth canal during childbirth. In: Dinulović D. (Editor). Obstetrics. Službeni glasnik SRJ, Belgrade, 1996, pp. 436–446 Google Scholar

  • [19] Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:1:CD000081 Google Scholar

  • [20] Goldman JC, Robinson J.N.The role of episiotomy in current obstetric practice. Semin Perinatol. 2003; 27: 3–12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/sper.2003.50000CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Frudinger A, Bartram CI, Spencer JAD, Kamm MA. Perineal examination as a predictor of underlying external anal sphincter damage. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 104:1009–1013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12058.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Alperin M, Krohn MA, Parviainen K. Episiotomy and increase in the risk of obstetric laceration in a subsequent vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1274–1278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816de899CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Landy HJ, Laughon SK, Bailit JL, Kominiarek MA, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Ramirez M et al. Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:627–635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820afaf2CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:464–471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00560-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P, Rydhstroem H. Obstetric risk factors for stress urinary incontinence: A population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96; 440-445 PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Casey BM, Schaffer JI, Bloom SL, Heartwell SF, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Obstetric antecedents for postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1655–1662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.031CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Viswanathan M, Hartmann K, Palmieri R, Lux L, Swinson T, Lohr KN et al. The Use of Episiotomy in Obstetrical Care: A Systematic Review. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2005; 112:1–8 Google Scholar

  • [28] Rockner G. Urinary incontinence after perineal trauma at childbirth. Scand J Caring Sci 1990;4:169–172 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Arrue M, Ibanez L, Paredes J, Murgiondo A., Belar M, Sarasqueta C et al. Stress urinary incontinence six months after first vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 210–214 PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, Pregazzi R, Grimaldi E, Guaschino S. The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:669–673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000119223.04441.c9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth 2006; 33:117–122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00088.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Wheeler T, Richter HE. Delivery method, anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: new information on a persistent problem. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007;19:474–479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282ef4142CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT. Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort study.BMJ 2000;320:86–90 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7227.86CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Pirro N, Sastre B, Sielezneff I. What are the risk factors of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? J Chir 2007;144:197–202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-7697(07)89514-7CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Terzic M. Internal genital organs. In: Milisavljevic M. (Editor): Clinical anatomy. Science, Belgrade, 1996, pp. 436–446 Google Scholar

  • [36] Buhling KJ, Schmidt S, Robinson JN, Klapp C, Siebert G, Dudenhausen JW.Rate of dyspareunia after delivery in primiparae according to mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;124:42–46 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.008CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [37] Sayasneh A, Pandeva I. Postpartum sexual disfunction. A literature review of risk factors and role of mode of delivery. BJMP 2010; 3:316–320 Google Scholar

  • [38] Ejegard H, Ryding EL, Sjogren B. Sexuality after delivery with episiotomy: A long-term follow-up. Gynecol Obstet Investig 2008; 66:1–7 Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [39] Danielsson I, Sjoberg I, Stenlund H, Wikman M. Prevalence and incidence of prolonged and severe dyspareunia in women: results from a population study. Scand J Public Health 2003;31:113–118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14034940210134040CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Joshi A, Acharya R. Perineal outcome after restrictive use of episiotomy in primi-gravidas. J Nepal Med Assoc 2009;48:269–272 Google Scholar

  • [41] Fritel X. Pelvic floor and pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2010; 38:332–346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.03.008Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [42] Adamo V, Di Natale W, Meola C, Gilio M, Cavalli S, Ferrari L et al. Endometriosis in episiotomy scar: a case report. 2004;56:735–738 Google Scholar

  • [43] Baloglu A, Uysal D, Aslan N, Yigit S. Advanced stage of cervical carcinoma undiagnosed during antenatal period in term pregnancy and concomitant metastasis on episiotomy scar during delivery: a case report and review of the literature. Int JGynecol Cancer. 2007;17:1155–1159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00926.xWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2011-10-08

Published in Print: 2011-12-01


Citation Information: Open Medicine, ISSN (Online) 2391-5463, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-011-0088-z.

Export Citation

© 2011 Versita Warsaw. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in