Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Medicine

formerly Central European Journal of Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Darzynkiewicz, Zbigniew

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.221

CiteScore 2018: 1.01

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.329
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.479

ICV 2017: 152.94

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 7, Issue 2


Volume 10 (2015)

Ultrasonography of the uterus within 6 weeks following Cesarean section

Erik Dosedla
  • Slovak Medical University, Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, III. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1st Private Hospital Košice-Šaca Inc., Košice-Šaca, Slovak Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Tomáš Kvasnička
  • First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital, Thrombosis Centre of Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Charles University, Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Pavel Calda
  • First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charles University, Prague, Apolinarska 18, 128 51, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2012-02-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-011-0134-x
  • [1] Antonelli E., Morales M.A., Dumps P., Boulvain M., Weil A. Sonographic detection of fluid collections and postoperative morbidity following Cesarean section and hysterectomy, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol,. 2004, 23, 388–392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.1023CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Hadar E., Melamed N., Tzadikevitch-Geffen K., Yogev Y. Timing and risk factors of maternal complications of cesarean section, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2011, 283(4), 735–741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1450-0CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Loverro G., Greco P., Vimercati A., Nicolardi V., Varcaccio-Garofalo G., Selvaggi L. Maternal complications associated with cesarean section, J. Perinat. Med., 2001, 29(4), 322–326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2001.046CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Gemer O., Shenhav S., Segal S., Harari D., Segal O., Zohav E. Sonographically diagnosed pelvic hematomas and post-cesarean febrile morbidity, Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 1999, 65, 7–9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00003-XCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Ben Nagi J., Ofili-Yebovi D., Marsh M., Jurkovic D. First trimester Cesarean scar pregnancy evolving into placenta previa/accreta at term, J. Ultrasound. Med., 2005, 24, 1569–1573 Google Scholar

  • [6] Jurkovic D., Hillaby K., Woelfer B., Lawrence A., Salim R., Elson C. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, 21, 220–227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.56CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Becker R.H., Vonk R., Mende B.C., Ragosch V., Entezami M. The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2001, 17, 496–501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00423.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Oyelese Y., Smulian J.C. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa, Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 107, 927–941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000207559.15715.98CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Ofili-Yebovi D., Ben-Nagi J., Sawyer E., Yazbek J., Lee C., Gonzalez J., Jurkovic D. Deficient lowersegment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 31, 72–77 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.5200CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Kushtagi P., Garepalli S. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2011, 283(3), 455–459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1384-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Jastrow N., Chaillet N., Roberge S., Morency A.M., Lacasse Y., Bujold E. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can., 2010, 32(4), 321–327 Google Scholar

  • [12] Shalev J., Royburt M., Fite G., Mashiach R., Schoenfeld A., Bar J., Ben-Rafael Z., Meizner I. Sonographic evaluation of the puerperal uterus: correlation with manual examination. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest., 2002, 53, 38–41 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000049409CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Koskas M., Nizard J., Salomon L.J., Ville Y. Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound findings within 24 hours following uneventful Cesarean section, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 32, 520–526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6120Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Sokol E.R., Casele H., Haney E.I. Ultrasound examination of the postpartum uterus: what is normal?, J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med., 2004, 15, 95–99 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767050310001650798CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Goodlin R.C. Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1999, 106(12), 1329 Google Scholar

  • [16] Buhimschi C.S., Zhao G., Sora N., Madri J.A., Buhimschi I.A. Myometrial Wound Healing Post-Cesarean Delivery in the MRL/MpJ Mouse Model of Uterine Scarring, Am. J. Pathol., 2010, 177, 197–207 http://dx.doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.091209CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Dicle O., Kucukler C., Pirnar T., Erata Y., Posaci C. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections, Eur. Radiol., 1997, 7, 31–34 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300050103CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Falanga V. The chronic wound: impaired healing and solutions in the context of wound bed preparation, Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, 2004, 32, 88–94 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2003.09.020CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Schugart R.C., Friedman A., Zhao R., Sen C.K. Wound angiogenesis as a function of tissue oxygen tension: a mathematical model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008, 105, 2628–3633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711642105CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Tinelli A., Malvasi A., Vittori G. Laparoscopic treatment of post-cesarean section bladder flap hematoma: A feasible and safe approach, Minim. Invasive. Ther. Allied. Technol., 2009, 18(6), 356–360 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13645700903201357CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Vikhareva Osser O., Valentin L. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section, BJOG, 2010, 117(9), 1119–1126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02631.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Vikhareva Osser O., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. (2008), OP23.01: Long duration of labor and postpartum anemia increase the risk of large defects in caesarean section scars. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 32, 389. doi: 10.1002/uog.5868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.5868CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Regnard C., Nosbusch M., Fellemans C., Benalli N., Van Rysselberghe M., Barlow P., Rozenberg S. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2004, 23, 289–292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.999CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Wound healing, chronic wounds http://www.emedicine.com/plastic/topic477.htm [Accessed 5 January 2007] Google Scholar

  • [25] Pollio F., Staibano S., Mascolo M., Salvatore G., Persico F., De Falco M., Di Lieto A. Uterine dehiscence in term pregnant patients with one previous cesarean delivery: growth factor immunoexpression and collagen content in the scarred lower uterine segment, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 194(2), 527–534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.048CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Vikhareva Osser O., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 34(1), 90–97 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6395Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Seow K., Huang L., Lin Y., Yan-Sheng Lin M., Tsai Y. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2004, 23, 247–253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.974CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28] Brassard N., Bujold E. (2009), OP15.09: A standardized method of LUS measurement in late pregnancy. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 34: 110. doi: 10.1002/uog.6796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6796CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Rotas M.A., Haberman S., Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management, Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 107(6), 1373–1381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Ramirez M.M., Gilbert S., Landon M.B., Rouse D.J., Spong C.Y., Varner M.W., Caritis S.N., Wapner R.J., Sorokin Y., Miodovnik M., Carpenter M., Peaceman A.M., O’sullivan M.J., Sibai B.M., Langer O., Thorp J.M., Mercer B.M. Mode of Delivery in Women with Antepartum Fetal Death and Prior Cesarean Delivery, Am. J. Perinatol., 2010, 27(10), 825–830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1254548CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2012-02-03

Published in Print: 2012-04-01

Citation Information: Open Medicine, Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 235–240, ISSN (Online) 2391-5463, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-011-0134-x.

Export Citation

© 2011 Versita Warsaw. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Mojgan Barati, Leili Zarei, Sarah Masihi, Razieh Mohammad J, and Farideh Moramezi
Asian Journal of Epidemiology, 2015, Volume 8, Number 2, Page 36
Stéphanie Roberge and Emmanuel Bujold
Open Medicine, 2013, Volume 8, Number 4

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in