Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Medicine

formerly Central European Journal of Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Darzynkiewicz, Zbigniew


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.221

CiteScore 2018: 1.01

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.329
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.479

ICV 2017: 152.94

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-5463
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 7, Issue 2

Issues

Volume 10 (2015)

Normalized gait parameters in NDT-Bobath post-stroke gait rehabilitation

Emilia Mikołajewska
  • Rehabilitation Clinic, The 10th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Powstańców Warszawy 5, 85-681, Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2012-02-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-011-0138-6

Abstract

The aim of the research was to evaluate the results of NDT-Bobath method in gait re-education of adult patients after ischemic stroke using normalized parameters of gait. The investigation group consisted of 60 patients, all sufferers of an ischemic stroke, and participated in a rehabilitation program: 10 sessions of NDT-Bobath therapy through 2 weeks (ten days of the therapy). Normalized parameters of gait were calculated based on anthropometric measures of patients and their gait parameters (gait velocity, cadence and stride length) measured in every patient on admission (before the therapy) and after the last session of the therapy to assess rehabilitation effects. Results among patients involved in the research were as follows: in normalized gait velocity: recovery in 42 cases (70 %), relapse in 10 cases (16,67 %), no measurable changes in 8 cases (13.33 %)in normalized cadence: recovery in 39 cases (65 %), relapse in 16 cases (26.67 %), no measurable changes in 5 cases (8.33 %)in normalized stride length: recovery in 50 cases (83.33 %), relapse in 4 cases (6.67 %), no measurable changes in 6 cases (10 %).

Observed statistically significant and favourable changes in health status of patients, described by normalized gait parameters, confirm effectiveness of the NDT-Bobath method.

Keywords: Rehabilitation; Ischaemic stroke; Normalized parameters of gait; NDT-Bobath; Gait re-education; Gait analysis

  • [1] Błaszczyk B., Czernecki R., Prędota-Panecka H., Profilaktyka pierwotna i wtórna udarów mózgu, Studia Medyczne, 2008, 9, 71–75, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [2] Członkowska A., Udar mózgu — perspektywy leczenia w Polsce w świetle osiągnięĆ światowych, Polski Przegląd Neurologiczny, 2005, 1, 1–7, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [3] Członkowska A., Osiągnięcia w zakresie udaru mózgu, Medycyna po Dyplomie, 2005, Supl. 17, 5–11, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [4] Palasik W., Nowe tendencje w terapii udaru niedokrwiennego, New trends in ischemic stroke therapy, Terapia, 2006, 1, 4–8, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [5] Profilaktyka wtórna udaru mózgu, Rekomendacje grupy ekspertów Narodowego Programu Profilaktyki i Leczenia Udaru Mózgu, Neurol. Neurochir. Pol., 2003, Supl. 6, 17–43, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [6] Muren M.A., Hütler M., Hooper J., Functional capacity and health-related quality of life in individuals post stroke, Top Stroke Rehabil., 2008, 15,1, 51–58 http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1501-51CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Murtezani A., Hundozi H., Gashi S., Osmani T., Krasniqi V., Rama B., Factors associated with reintegration to normal living after stroke, Med. Arh., 2009, 63,4, 216–219 Google Scholar

  • [8] Starsky A.J., Sangani S.G., McGuire J.R., Logan B., Schmit B.D., Reliability of biomechanical spasticity measurements at the elbow of people poststroke, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2005, 86,8, 1648–1654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.015CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Platz T., Eickhof C., Nuyens G., Vuadens P., Clinical scales for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena, and function: a systematic review of the literature, Disabil. Rehabil., 2005, 27,1–2, 7–18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280400014634CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Brashear A., Zafonte R., Corcoran M., Galvez-Jimenez N., Gracies J.M., Gordon M.F., et al., Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticity, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2002, 83,10, 1349–1354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.35474CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Bohannon R.W., Smith M.B., Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity, Phys. Ther., 1987, 6, 206–207 Google Scholar

  • [12] Bromley I., Tetraplegia and paraplegia: a guide for physiotherapists, 6th ed., Churchill Livingstone, London, 2006 Google Scholar

  • [13] Davies P.M., Steps to follow: the comprehensive treatment of adult hemiplegia, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 2000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57022-3Google Scholar

  • [14] Howle J.M., Neuro-Developmental Treatment Approach. Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice, Neuro-Developmental Treatment Association, Laguna Beach, 2003 Google Scholar

  • [15] Mayston M.J., Problem solving in neurological physiotherapy — setting the scene, In: Edwards S. (Ed.), Neurological physiotherapy — a problem solving approach, 2nd ed., Churchill Livingstone, London, 2001 Google Scholar

  • [16] Lennon S., Ashburn A., The Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study of the experienced physiotherapists’ perspective, Disabil. Rehabil., 2000, 15, 665–674 Google Scholar

  • [17] Lennon S., Baxter D., Ashburn A., Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a survey within the UK, Disabil. Rehabil., 2001, 6, 254–262 Google Scholar

  • [18] Bobath B., Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment, 3rd ed., Heinemann Medical Books, London, 1990 Google Scholar

  • [19] Paci M., Physiotherapy based on the Bobath Concept for adults with post-stroke hemiplegia: a review of effectiveness studies, J. Rehabil. Med., 2003, 1, 2–7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16501970306106CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Mikołajewska E., Przykład terapii chodu metodą NDT-Bobath u pacjenta z hemiplegią, Prakt. Fizjoter. Rehabil., 2010, 11, 16–20, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [21] Mikołajewska E., Metoda NDT-Bobath w praktyce klinicznej, Praktyczna Fizjoterapia i Rehabilitacja, 2010, 11, 14–15, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [22] Mikołajewska E., Metoda NDT-Bobath w usprawnianiu osób dorosłych: wprowadzenie do metody, Praktyczna Fizjoterapia i Rehabilitacja, 2010, 11, 8–13, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [23] Mikołajewska E., Metoda NDT-Bobath w neurorehabilitacji pacjentów dorosłych, Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warsaw, 2011, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [24] Lennon S., Gait re-education based on the Bobath concept in two patients with hemiplegia following stroke, Phys. Ther., 2001, 3, 924–935 Google Scholar

  • [25] Wall J.C., Kirtley C., Strategies for clinical gait assessment, Orthop. Phys. Ther. Clin. N. Am., 2001, 3, 35–54 Google Scholar

  • [26] Whittle M.W., Gait analysis: an introduction. 3rd ed., Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford-Waltham, 2002 Google Scholar

  • [27] Mikołajewska E., Analiza chodu pacjentów po udarze mózgu — rozwiązanie własne, Udar Mózgu Problemy Interdyscyplinarne, 2010, 12,1–2, 20–26, (in Polish) Google Scholar

  • [28] Kirtley C., Whittle M.W., Jefferson R.J., Influence of walking speed on gait parameters, J. Biomed. Eng., 1985, 4, 282–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(85)90055-XCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Kirtley C., CGA Clinical Gait Analysis available on Dr Kirtley’s website (http://www.clinicalgaitanalysis.com/) Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2012-02-03

Published in Print: 2012-04-01


Citation Information: Open Medicine, Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 176–182, ISSN (Online) 2391-5463, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-011-0138-6.

Export Citation

© 2011 Versita Warsaw. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in