Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Moravian Geographical Reports

The Journal of Institute of Geonics AS CR, v.v.i.

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.149

CiteScore 2016: 1.97

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.472
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.548

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1210-8812
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Conceptualising patterns of spatial flows: Five decades of advances in the definition and use of functional regions

Pavel Klapka / Marián Halás
Published Online: 2016-07-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0006

Abstract

Some fifty years in the development of ideas about the definition and use of functional regions are elaborated in this article, as an introduction to this Special Issue of the Moravian Geographical Reports. The conceptual basis for functional regions is discussed, initially in relation to region-organising interactions and their behavioural foundations. This paper presents an approach to functional regions which presumes that such regions objectively exist and that they are based on more or less tangible processes (however, a different view of regions is also briefly described). A typology of functional regions is presented and the development of methods for finding a definition of functional regions is discussed, as well as a typology for these methods. The final part of this article stresses the importance of functional regions in geographical research, and introduces some emerging new prospects in the study of functional regions.

Keywords: spatial flows; functional region; functional regionalisation; regional taxonomy; geographical thought

References

  • ABLER, R., ADAMS, J. S., GOULD, P. (1972): Spatial organization: The geographer’s view of the world. London, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • ALONSO, M. P., BEAMONTE, A., GARGALLO, P., SALVADOR, M. (2015): Local labour markets delineation: an approach based on evolutionary algorithms and classification methods. Journal of Applied Statistics, 42(5): 1043-1063.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BALL, R. M. (1980): The use and definition of travel-to-work areas in Great Britain: some problems. Regional Studies, 14(2): 125-139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BAUMANN, J. H., FISCHER, M. M., SCHUBERT, U. (1983): A multiregional labour supply model for Austria: the effects of different regionalisations in multiregional labour market modelling. Papers in Regional Science, 52(1): 53-83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BERRY, B. J. L. (1968): A synthesis of formal and functional regions using a general field theory of spatial behaviour. In: Berry, B. J. L, Marble, D. F. [eds.]: Spatial Analysis (pp. 419-428). Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

  • BERRY, B. J. L. (1973): Growth centres in the American urban system. Cambridge, Mass., Ballinger. Google Scholar

  • BEZÁK, A. (2000): Funkčné mestské regióny na Slovensku. Geographia Slovaca 15, Bratislava, Geografický ústav SAV.Google Scholar

  • BEZDEK, J. C., EHRLICH, R., FULL, W. (1984): FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Computers & Geosciences, 10(2): 191-203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BHASKAR, R. (1998): The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, Third edition. London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar

  • BLOMMESTEIN, H., NIJKAMP, P., VAN VEENENDAAL, W. (1980): Shopping Perceptions and Preferences: A Multidimensional Attractiveness Analysis of Consumer and Entrepreneurial Attitudes. Economic Geography, 56(2): 155-174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BROWN, L. A., HOLMES, J. (1971): The delimitation of functional regions, nodal regions, and hierarchies by functional distance approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 11(1): 57-72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BRUSH, J. E. (1953): The hierarchy of central places in Wisconsin. Geographical Review, 53(3): 380-402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • CASADO-DÍAZ, J. M. (2000): Local labour market areas in Spain: a case study. Regional Studies, 34(9): 843-856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • CASADO-DÍAZ, J. M., COOMBES, M. (2011): The delineation of 21st century local labour markets areas: a critical review and a research agenda. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 57: 7-32.Google Scholar

  • CHRISTALLER, W. (1933): Die zentralen Orte in Suddeutschland. Jena, Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar

  • COOMBES, M. (2010): Defining labour market areas by analysing commuting data: innovative methods in the 2007 review of Travel-to-Work Areas. In: Stillwell, J., et al. [eds.]: Technologies for migration and commuting analysis: spatial interaction data applications (pp. 227- 241). Hershey, IGI Global.Google Scholar

  • COOMBES, M. G. (2000): Defining locality boundaries with synthetic data. Environment and Planning A, 32(8): 1499-1518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • COOMBES, M. G., BOND, S. (2008): Travel-to-Work Areas: the 2007 review. London, Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar

  • COOMBES, M. G., DIXON, J. S., GODDARD, J. B., OPENSHAW, S., TAYLOR, P. J. (1982): Functional regions for the population census of Great Britain. In: Herbert, D. T., Johnston, R. J. [eds.]: Geography and the Urban Environment. Progress in Research and Applications 5 (pp. 63-112). Chichester, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar

  • COOMBES, M. G., DIXON, J. S., GODDARD, J. B., OPENSHAW, S., TAYLOR, P. J. (1979): Daily urban systems in Britain: from theory to practice. Environment and Planning A, 11(5): 565-574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • COOMBES, M. G., GREEN, A. E., OPENSHAW, S. (1986): An Efficient Algorithm to Generate Official Statistical Reporting Areas: The Case of the 1984 Travel-to-Work Areas Revision in Britain. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 37(10): 943-953.Google Scholar

  • COOMBES, M. G., OPENSHAW, S. (1982): The use and definition of travel-to-work areas in Great Britain: some comments. Regional Studies, 16(2): 141-149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • CÖRVERS, F., HENSEN, M., BONGAERTS, D. (2009): Delimitation and coherence of functional and administrative regions. Regional Studies, 43(1): 19-31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DICKINSON, R. E. (1930): The regional functions and zones of influence of Leeds and Bradford. Geography, 15(7): 548-557.Google Scholar

  • DIJST, M., FARAG, S., SCHWANEN, T. (2008): A comparative study of attitude theory and other theoretical models for understanding travel behaviour. Environment and Planning A, 40(4): 831-847.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DROBNE, S., BOGATAJ, M. (2012): A method to define the number of functional regions: An application to NUTS 2 and NUTS 3 levels in Slovenia. Geodetski vestnik, 56(1): 105-150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DROBNE, S., KONJAR, M., LISEC, A. (2010): Razmejitev funkcionalnih regij Slovenije na podlagi analize trga dela. Geodetski vestnik, 54(3): 481-500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DZIEWOŃSKI, K. (1967): Concepts and terms in the field of economic regionalization. In: Macka, M. [ed.]: Economic regionalization (pp. 25-36). Praha, Academia.Google Scholar

  • FARMER, C. J. Q., FOTHERINGHAM, A. S. (2011): Network-based functional regions. Environment and Planning A, 43(11): 2723-2741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • FENG, Z. (2009): Fuzziness of Travel to Work Areas. Regional Studies, 43(5): 707-720.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • FERIA, J. M., CASADO-DÍAZ, J. M., MARTÍNEZBERNABÉU, L. (2015): Inside the metropolis: the articulation of Spanish metropolitan areas into local labor markets. Urban Geography, 36(7): 1018-1041.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • FISCHER, M. M., ESSLETZBICHLER, J., GASSLER, H., TRICHTL, G. (1993): Telephone communication patterns in Austria: a comparison of the IPFP-based graphtheoretic and the Intramax approaches. Geographical Analysis, 25(3): 224-233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • FLÓREZ-REVUELTA, F., CASADO-DÍAZ, J. M., MARTÍNEZBERNABEU, L. (2008): An evolutionary approach to the delineation of functional areas based on travel-towork flows. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 5(1): 10-21.Google Scholar

  • FOTHERINGHAM, A. S., WONG, D. W. S. (1991): The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23(7): 1025-1044.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • GIDDENS, A. (1984): The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar

  • GOLLEDGE, R. G., STIMPSON, R. J. (1997): Spatial behavior: a geographical perspective. New York-London, The Guildford Press.Google Scholar

  • GOODMAN, J. F. B. (1970): The definition and analysis of local labour markets: some empirical problems. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 8(2): 179-196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • GREER-WOOTTEN, B., GILMOUR, G. M. (1972): Distance and Directional Bias in Migration Patterns in Depreciating Metropolitan Areas. Geographical Analysis, 4(1): 92-97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • GRIGG, D. (1967): Regions, models, and classes. In: Chorley, R. J., Haggett, P. [eds.]: Models in Geography (pp. 461- 509). London, Methuen.Google Scholar

  • GRUCHOCIAK, H. (2012): Delimitacja lokalnych rynków pracy v Polsce, Przegląd statystyczny. Numer specjalny, 2: 277-297.Google Scholar

  • HAGGETT, P. (1965): Locational Analysis in Human Geography. London, Arnold. Google Scholar

  • HAGGETT, P. (2008): The spirit of quantitative geography. Geographical Analysis, 40(3): 226-228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • HALÁS, M., KLADIVO, P., ŠIMÁČEK, P., MINTÁLOVÁ, T. (2010): Delimitation of micro-regions in the Czech Republic by nodal relations. Moravian Geographical Reports, 18(2): 16-22.Google Scholar

  • HALÁS, M., KLAPKA, P., BEDNÁŘ, M., TONEV, P. (2015): An alternative definition and use for the constraint function for rule-based methods of functional regionalisation. Environment and Planning A, 47(5): 1175-1191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • HALÁS, M., KLAPKA, P., BLEHA, B., BEDNÁŘ, M. (2014): Funkčné regióny na Slovensku podľa denných tokov do zamestnania. Geografický časopis, 66(2): 89-114.Google Scholar

  • HALL, P. (1974): The containment of urban England. Geographical Journal, 140(3): 386-408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • HALL, P., HAY, D. (1980): Growth centres in the European urban system. London, Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar

  • HAYNES, R., LOVETT, A., SÜNNENBERG, G. (2003): Potential accessibility, travel time, and consumer choice: geographical variations in general medical practice registrations in eastern England. Environment and Planning A, 35(10): 1733-1750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • HIRST, M. A. (1977): Hierarchical aggregation procedures for interaction data: a comment. Environment and Planning A, 9(1): 99-103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • HOLMES, J. H., HAGGETT, P. (1977): Graph theory interpretation of flow matrices: a note on maximization procedures for identifying significant links. Geographical Analysis, 9(4): 388-399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ISARD, W. (1956): Regional science, the concept of region, and regional structure. Papers in Regional Science, 2(1): 13-26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • JOHNSTON, R. (2008): Quantitative Human Geography: Are We Turning Full Circle? Geographical Analysis, 40(3): 332-335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • JOHNSTON, R. J., ROSSITER, D. J. (1981): An approach to the delimitation of planning regions. Applied Geography 1(1): 55-69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KARLSSON, C., OLSSON, M. (2006): The identification of functional regions: theory, methods, and applications. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(1): 1-18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KEANE, M. J. (1978): A functional distance approach to regionalization. Regional Studies, 12(3): 379-386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KILLER, V., AXHAUSEN, K. W. (2011): Understanding overlapping functional commuting regions with confidence ellipses and social network methods. Working Papers Traffic and Spatial Planning, 714, Zurich, IVT, ETH Zurich.Google Scholar

  • KLAPKA, P., HALÁS, M., ERLEBACH, M., TONEV, P., BEDNÁŘ, M. (2014): A multistage agglomerative approach for defining functional regions of the Czech Republic: the use of 2001 commuting data. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22(4): 2-13.Google Scholar

  • KLAPKA, P., HALÁS, M., TONEV, P. (2013a): Functional regions: concept and types. In 16th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences, Conference Proceedings (pp. 94-101). Brno, Masaryk University.Google Scholar

  • KLAPKA, P., HALÁS, M., TONEV, P., BEDNÁŘ, M. (2013b): Functional regions of the Czech Republic: comparison of simple and advanced methods of regional taxonomy. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis, Facultas Rerum Naturalium, Geographica, 44(1): 45-57.Google Scholar

  • KROPP, P., SCHWENGLER, B. (2016): Three-Step Method for Delineating Functional Labour Market Regions. Regional Studies, 50(3): 429-445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KWAN, M. P. (1998): Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical analysis, 30(3): 191-216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KWAN, M. P., MURRAY, A. T., O'KELLY, M. E., TIEFELSDORF, M. (2003): Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications. Journal of Geographical Systems 5(1): 129-138.Google Scholar

  • LANDRÉ, M. (2012): Geoprocessing journey-to-work data: delineating commuting regions in Dalarna, Sweden. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 1(3): 294-314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LANDRÉ, M., HÅKANSSON, J. (2013): Rule versus interaction function: evaluating regional aggregations of commuting flows in Sweden. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 13(1): 1-19.Google Scholar

  • LENNTORP, B. (1976): Paths in Space-Time Environments. A Time-Geographic Study of Movement Possibilities of Individuals. Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, 44. Lund, Royal University of Lund.Google Scholar

  • LÖSCH, A. (1940): Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Eine Untersuchung über Standort, Wirtschaftsgebiete und internationalem Handel. Jena, Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar

  • MACKA, M. [ed.] (1967): Economic Regionalisation. Praha, Academia.Google Scholar

  • MARTÍNEZ-BERNABEU, L., FLÓREZ-REVUELTA, F., CASADO-DÍAZ, J. M. (2012): Grouping genetic operators for the delineation of functional areas based on spatial interaction. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8): 6754-6766.Google Scholar

  • MASSER, I., BROWN, P. J. B. (1975): Hierarchical aggregation procedures for interaction data. Environment and Planning A, 7(5): 509-523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MASSER, I., SCHEURWATER J. (1978): The specification of multi-level systems for spatial analysis. In: Masser, I., Brown, P. J. B. [eds.]: Spatial representation and spatial interaction (pp. 151-172). Studies in Applied Regional Science, 10, Leiden-Boston, Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

  • MASSER, I., SCHEURWATER J. (1980): Functional regionalisation of spatial interaction data: an evaluation of some suggested strategies. Environment and Planning A, 12(12): 1357-1382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MITCHELL, W. F., WATTS, M. J. (2010): Identifying functional regions in Australia using hierarchical aggregate techniques. Geographical Research, 48(1): 24-41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MORRILL, R. L. (1970): The Spatial Organization of Society. Belmont, Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • MORRILL, R. L. (1974): The Spatial Organization of Society. 2nd edition. North Scituate, Duxbury Press.Google Scholar

  • MURPHY, A. B. (1991): Regions as Social Construct: The Gap between Theory and Practice. Progress in Human Geography, 15(1): 23-35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • NEL, J. H., KRYGSMAN, S. C., DE JONG, T. (2008): The identification of possible future provincial boundaries for South Africa based on an intramax analysis of journeyto- work data. ORiON, 24(2): 131-156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • NEWELL, J. O., PERRY, M. (2005): Explaining continuity in New Zealand’s local labour market areas 1991 to 2001. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 11(2): 155-174.Google Scholar

  • NYSTUEN, J. D., DACEY, M. F. (1961): A graph theory interpretation of nodal regions. Regional Science Association, Papers and Proceedings, 7(1): 29-42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • OPENSHAW, S. (1984): The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. CATMOG 38. Norwich, GeoBooks.Google Scholar

  • PAASI, A. (1991): Deconstructing regions: notes on the scales of spatial life. Environment and Planning A, 23(2): 239-256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PAPPS, K. L., NEWELL, J. O. (2002): Identifying functional labour market areas in New Zealand: a reconnaissance study using travel-to-work data. Discussion Paper 443. Bonn, Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar

  • PERSYN, D., TORFS, W. (2011): Functional labour markets in Belgium: evolution over time and intersectoral comparison. In: Discussion Paper 17 (pp. 1-17). Vlaams Instituut voor Economie en Samenleving. Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit.Google Scholar

  • PHILBRICK, A. K. (1957): Principles of areal functional organization in regional human geography. Economic Geography, 33(4): 299-336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PLATT, R. S. (1928): A detail of regional geography: Ellison Bay, community as an industrial organism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 18(2): 81-126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PRED, A. (1977): The Choreography of Existence: Comments on Hägerstrand´s Time-geography and its Usefulness. Economic Geography, 53(2): 207-221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ROBINSON, G. W. S. (1953). The geographical region: form and function. The Scottish Geographical Magazine, 69(2): 49-58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SFORZI, F. [ed.] (1997): I sistemi locali del lavoro. 1991. Roma, Istat.Google Scholar

  • SLATER, P. B. (1976): A hierarchical regionalization of Japanese prefectures using 1972 interprefectural migration flows. Regional Studies, 10(1): 123-132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SMART, M. W. (1974): Labour market areas: uses and definition. Progress in Planning, 2(4): 239-353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SYMANSKI, R., NEWMAN, J. L. (1973): Formal, functional and nodal regions: three fallacies. Professional Geographer, 25(4): 350-352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • TAYLOR, P. J. (1991): A theory and practice of regions: the case of Europes. Environment and Planning D, 9(2): 183-195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • TERLOUW, K. (2001): Regions in geography and the regional geography of semiperipheral development. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 92(1): 76-87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • TIMMERMANS, H., ARENTZE, T., JOH, C.-H. (2002) Analysing space-time behaviour: new approaches to old problems. Progress in Human Geography, 26(2): 175-190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • TOBLER, W. (1970): A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, Supplement: Proceedings. International Geographical Union, Commission on quantitative methods: 234-240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ULLMAN, E. (1980): Geography as spatial interaction. Washington, University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

  • UNWIN, D. J. (1996): GIS, spatial analysis and spatial statistics. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4): 540-551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • VAN DER LAAN, L., SCHALKE, R. (2001): Reality versus policy: the delineation and testing of local Labour Market and Spatial Policy Areas. European Planning Studies, 9(2): 201-221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • WARD, J. H. (1963): Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301): 236-244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • WATTS, M. (2004): Local labour markets in New South Wales: fact or fiction? Centre of Full Employment and Equity, Working Paper 04-12. Callaghan, the University of Newcastle, Australia.Google Scholar

  • WATTS, M. (2009): Rules versus hierarchy: an application of fuzzy set theory to the assessment of spatial grouping techniques. In: Kolehmainen, M., et al. [eds.]: Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5495 (pp. 517-526). Berlin- Heidelberg, Springer.Google Scholar

  • WATTS, M. (2013): Assessing different spatial grouping algorithms: an application to the design of Australia's new statistical geography. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(1): 92-112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • WILSON, A. (1969): Notes on some concepts in social physics. Regional Science Association, Papers, 22(1): 159-193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • YANG, M. S. (1993): A survey of fuzzy clustering. Mathematical and Computer modelling, 18(11): 1-16.Google Scholar

  • ZIPF, G. K. (1949): Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, Mass., Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-01-08

Accepted: 2016-05-06

Published Online: 2016-07-08

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Citation Information: Moravian Geographical Reports, ISSN (Online) 1210-8812, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0006.

Export Citation

© 2016. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Elsa Soares, Rossano Figueiredo, and Francisco Vala
Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 2017, Volume 33, Number 3, Page 615
[2]
Kamil Pícha, Josef Navrátil, and Roman Švec
Journal of Food Products Marketing, 2017, Page 1
[3]
Marián Halás, Pavel Klapka, and Petr Tonev
Applied Geography, 2016, Volume 76, Page 98

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in