Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.40

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.404

Covered by e.g. Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, and SCOPUS by Elsevier
14 points in the Ministerial journal value rating scale

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Geography and Social Sciences in Transdisciplinary Science

Andrzej Lisowski
  • Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, Department of Urban Geography and Spatial Organization, University of Warsaw
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2012-08-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10288-012-0001-x

Geography and Social Sciences in Transdisciplinary Science

The subject of the paper is the status and relationships of geography, especially human geography, with the social sciences on the background of the evolution of science from multidisciplinary to transdisciplinary. Progressive hybridization of disciplines and specialties upset the identity of geography in modern science, but geography (human geography), as she was, so it is hardly accepted as a social science among scientists. An important role is played by the traditional assignment of the entire geography to natural sciences and greater isolation of human geography in flows of knowledge within the social sciences. The article presents the specificities of the social sciences in the classification of the sciences, the impact of social sciences on past development of geography and contemporary impact of geography on spatial turn in the social sciences.

Keywords: geography; human geography; social sciences; transdisciplinary science

  • Ackerman E. A. 1963, Where is a research frontier? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 53 (4), 429-440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andersson R., Musterd S., 2003, Area-based policies: a critical appraisal, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96, 4, s. 377-389.Google Scholar

  • Aoyma Y., Murphy J. T., Hanson S., 2011, Key Concepts in Economic Geography, Sage, London.Google Scholar

  • Bingham N., Thrift N., 2000. Some new instructions for travelers: the geography of BrunoGoogle Scholar

  • Latour and Michel Serres. [in:] Crang M., Thrift N. (ed.) Thinking Space. Routledge, London-New York, 281-301.Google Scholar

  • Blaut J. M., 1962. Object and relationship, Professional Geographer, 14, 1-6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bourdieu P. 1975, The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason, Social Science Information, 14 (6), 31-47.Google Scholar

  • Bridge G., Watson S., 2000, City Imaginaries [in:]. (ed.) A companion of the city, Blackwell Publishing, Malden-Oxford 7-18, 7-17.Google Scholar

  • Brigham A. P., 1915, Problems of geographic influence, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 5, 3-25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown E. H. 1975, The content and relationships of physical geography, The Geographical Journal, 141, 1, 35-40.Google Scholar

  • Brzeziński M., Gorynia M., Hockuba Z., 2008, Ekonomia a inne nauki społeczne na początku XXI wieku, Między imperializmem a kooperacją [Economics and other social sciences at the beginning of XXIst century. Between imperialism and cooperation], Ekonomista, 2, 201-232Google Scholar

  • Burt W. 2005, General / particular, [in:] Castries N., Rogers A., Sherman D., (eds.) Questioning Geography. Fundamental Debates, Blackwell Publishing, Malden-Oxford, 117-130.Google Scholar

  • Castells M., 1977, Urban Question, A Marxist Approach, E. Arnold, London.Google Scholar

  • Castree N., 2005, Is geography a science? [in:] Castries N., Rogers A., Sherman D., (eds.) Questioning Geography. Fundamental Debates, Blackwell Publishing, Malden-Oxford, 57-79.Google Scholar

  • Chojnicki Z., 2004, Problematyka metodologiczna studiów regionalnych [Metodological problems of regional studies], Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 4 (18), 5-11Google Scholar

  • Chojnicki Z., 1996, Region w ujęciu geograficzno-systemowym [Region in geographic-systemic approach] [in:] Czyż T. (ed.), Podstawy regionalizacji geograficznej, Bogucki Wyd. Naukowe, Poznań, 7-44.Google Scholar

  • Chojnicki Z., 1988, Basic philosophical and methodological problems of space and time, Concepts and Methods in Geography 3 (1988), 9-23).Google Scholar

  • Chojnicki Z., 1973, Założenia i perspektywy rozwoju geografii ekonomicznej [Assumptions and perspectives of of economic geography development], Przegląd Geograficzny, 45, 1, 3-27.Google Scholar

  • Coe N. M., Kelly P. F., Yeung H. W. C. 2007, Economic geography: a contemporary introduction, Blackwell Publishing, Malden.Google Scholar

  • Czwarno M., 2003, Homo oeconomicus kontra homo sociologicus, czyli dlaczego ekonomiści nie lubią socjologów, a socjologowie nie przepadają za ekonomistami, [Homo economicus vs. homo sociologicus, that is why economists do not like sociologists, and sociologists are not fond of economists] Studia Socjologiczne, 3 (170), 113-135.Google Scholar

  • David P. A. 2001, Path dependence, its critics and the quest for ‘Historical Economics’ [in:] Garrouste P., Ioannides S. (eds.) Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas; Past and Present, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 15-40.Google Scholar

  • Del Casino J. V. 2009, Social Geography: A Critical Introduction, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Dogan M., 1996, The hybridization of social science knowledge - Navigating among the disciplines: The library and interdisciplinary inquiry, Library Trends, 45, 2, 296-314.Google Scholar

  • Dogan M., Pahre R., 1989, Fragmentation and recombination of the social sciences, Studies in Comparative International Development, summer, 24, 2, 56-73.Google Scholar

  • Domański H., 2006, Niektóre zagrożenia profesjonalizacji [Some hazards of professionalisation] [in:] Polskie nauki humanistyczne i społeczne w nowym stuleciu w nowej Europie, Wydawnictwo Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, Warszawa, 46-51.Google Scholar

  • Dominiak Ł. M., 2006, Strategie interdyscyplinarności w perspektywie naukoznawczej [Strategies of interdisciplinarity in scientific perspective], [in:] Kowalewski J., Piasek W., Śliwa M. (eds.) Granice dyscyplinarne w humanistyce, Colloquia Humaniorium, Olsztyn, 47-60Google Scholar

  • Dybiec J., 1993, Polska Akademia Umiejętności 1872-1952 [ Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences 1872-1952] Secesja, Kraków.Google Scholar

  • Elster J., 2010, One social science or many? {in:] World Social Science Report 2010, Knowledge Divides, UNESCO Publishing, International Social Science Council, Paris, 199-203.Google Scholar

  • Fenneman N. M., 1919, The circumference of geography, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 9, 3-11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M., 1994, The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar

  • Giddens A., 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Polity Press, Blackwell Publishers, London.Google Scholar

  • Golledge R. G. Stimson R. J., 1997, Spatial Behavior: A Geographical Perspective, Guilford Press, New York- London.Google Scholar

  • Grobler A., 2006, Metodologia nauk [Methodology of science], Aureus-Znak, Kraków.Google Scholar

  • Hamnett C. 2003, Contemporary geography: fiddling while Rome burns, Geoforum 34, 1-3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hardt M., Negri A., 2000, Empire, Harvard University Press, Harvard.Google Scholar

  • Hartshorne R., 1959, Perspective on the nature of geography, AAAG/ Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar

  • Harvey D., 2009, Reshaping economic geography: The World Development Report 2009, Development and Change 40, 6, 1269-1277.Google Scholar

  • Harvey D., 1969, Explanation in geography, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar

  • Isačenko A. G., 1975, Historia myśli geograficznej, [A history of geographical thought] PWN, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Jackowski A., Sołjan I., 2009, Z dziejów geografii na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim (XV-XXI wiek) [The history of geography at Jagiellonian University (XV-XXI century)], Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków.Google Scholar

  • Jahn A., 1990, Podsumowanie i komentarz [Czym była i jest polska geografia] [What was and is Polish geography], Czasopismo Geograficzne 3-4, 180-186.Google Scholar

  • James P. E., Martin G. J., 1981, All possible worlds. A history of geographical ideas, J. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar

  • Johnston R., 2003, Geography: a different sort of discipline? "Transactions, Institute of British Geographers NS", 28, 133-141.Google Scholar

  • Johnston R. 2002, Reflection on Nigel Thrift's optimism: political strategies to implement his vision, Geoforum 33, 421-425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnston R. J., 1997, Geography and geographers; Anglo-American human geography since 1945, Blackwell, London-New York-Sydney-Auckland.Google Scholar

  • Kamiński S. 1981, Pojęcie nauki i klasyfikacja nauk, [The concept of science and classification of sciences], Rozprawy Wydziału Filozoficznego. Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, Lublin.Google Scholar

  • Kitchen R., Blades M., 2001, The cognition of geographic space, I. B. Tauris, London.Google Scholar

  • Kuijper H., 2008, Area Studies versus Disciplines: Towards an Interdisplinary, Systemic Country Approach, The International Journal of Interdisciplinarity Social Sciences, 3, 7, 205-216.Google Scholar

  • Laponce J. A., 1980, Political Science: An Import-Export Analysis of Journals and Footnotes, Political Studies, 401-419.Google Scholar

  • Lefebvre H., 1991, The production of space, Blackwell, Oxford-Cambridge MA.Google Scholar

  • Lopreato J., Crippen T., 1999, Crisis in Sociology; The Need for Darwin, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick NJ.Google Scholar

  • Kaltenberg-Kwiatkowska E., 2007, Socjologia przestrzeni w Polsce. Narodziny subdyscypliny [Sociology of space in Poland. Birth of a subdiscipline] [in:] Borowik I., Sztalta K., (eds.) Współczesna socjologia miasta.Wielość oglądów i kierunków badawczych, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław, 9-24.Google Scholar

  • Kates R. W., 2002, Humboldt's dream, beyond disciplines, and sustainability science: contested identities in restructuring Academy, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92 (1), 79-81.Google Scholar

  • Kaufmann A., Kasztler A., 2009, Differences in publication and dessemination practices between disciplinary and transdisciplinary science and the consequences for research evaluation, Science and Public Policy, 36 93), April, 215-227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kotarbiński T., 1961. Elementy teorii poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk, [ Elements of the theory of knowledge, formal logic and methodology of science], Ossolineum, Wrocław.Google Scholar

  • Krajewski W., 1982. Prawa nauki. Przegląd zagadnień metodologicznych i filozoficznych [The laws of science. Review of methodological and philosophical issues], PWN, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Kula M. 2010, Przyszłość historyków [The future of historians], Uniwersytet Warszawski 5(49), 12-13.Google Scholar

  • Lisowski A., 2009, Jakie "studia regionalne" mogą podnieść prestiż geografii [What regional studies can raise the prestige of geography?], [in:] Richling A., Lechowicz M., (eds.) Studia regionalne a rozwój geografii, KNG PAN, WGSR UW, Warszawa, 23-38.Google Scholar

  • Lisowski A., 2006, Przedmiot badań, funkcje i tożsamość geografii na początku XXI wieku [The subject of research, functions and identity of geography at the beginning of the twentyfirst century] [in:] Maik W., Rembowska K., Suliborski A. (eds.) Geografia a przemiany współczesnego świata; Podstawowe idee i koncepcje w geografii T. 3, Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki, Bydgoszcz 2007, 39-54.Google Scholar

  • Lisowski A. 2004, Geografia społeczno-ekonomiczna a nauki społeczne [Socio-economic geography and social sciences] [in:] Chojnicki Z. (ed.) Geografia wobec problemów teraźniejszości i przyszłości, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 2004, 67-80.Google Scholar

  • Lisowski A., 2003, Koncepcje przestrzeni w geografii człowieka, [The concepts of space in human geography], WGSR Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Lisowski A., 1996. Tendencje dezintegracyjne i integracyjne we współczesnej geografii czło wieka [Disintegrative and integrative tendencies in contemporary human geography]Przegląd Geograficzny 68, 3-4, 317-333.Google Scholar

  • Maik W., 2004, Główne płaszczyzny relacji między geografią fizyczną a geografią społecznoekonomiczną [The main planes of the relationships between physical geography and socio-economic geography [in:] Chojnicki Z. (ed.) Geografia wobec problemów teraźniejszości i przyszłości, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 2004, 9-24.Google Scholar

  • Martin R., 1999, The new ‘geographical turn’ in economics: some critical reflections, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 65-91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Melezin A., 1985, Wiktor Ormicki w Wilnie [Wiktor Ormicki in Vilnius] Czasopismo Geograficzne, 55, 3-4, 433-434.Google Scholar

  • Morillo F., Bordons M., Gomez I. 2003, Interdisciplinarity in Science: A Tentative Typology of Disciplines and Reserch Areas, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (13) 1237-1249.Google Scholar

  • Mulligan G. F., 2003, What's wrong with economic geography? Other thoughts on the rift, Canadian Journal of Regional Science, XVI, 1, 33-37.Google Scholar

  • Nowakowski S. 1934-35, Geografja jako nauka i dzieje odkryć geograficznych, [Geography as a science and history of geographical discoveries] Wielka Geografia Powszechna, T.1. Trzaska, Evert i Michalski, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Passen van C., 1957, The classical tradition of geography, JB Wolters, Groningen.Google Scholar

  • Ratajczak M., 2009, Economics in the Age of Crisis: between Anti-Economics and Economic Triumphalism, [in:] Kopycińska D. (ed.), Decision Makers' Behaviour under the Conditions of Crisis Threat, University of Sczecin, Microeconomics Department, Szczecin, 22-31.Google Scholar

  • Rigg J., Bebbington A., Gough K. V., Bryceson D. F., Agergaard J., Fold N., Tacoli C., 2009, The World Development Report 2009 ‘reshapes economic geography’: geographical reflections, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers NS, 34, 128-136.Google Scholar

  • Sawicki L. 1932, Zarys ogólnej geografiji ziem polskich, [An outline of the overall geography of the Polish lands], Kraków.Google Scholar

  • Scott A., 2009, World Development Report 2009; reshaping economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 583-586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith N., 1987, "Academic war over the field of geography": the elimination of geography at Harvard, 1947-1951, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77 (2) 155-172.Google Scholar

  • Soja E. W., 1989. Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in critical social theory, Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar

  • Such 1987, Klasyfikacja nauki [Classification of science] [in:] Cackowski Z., Kmita J., Szaniawski K., Smoczyński P. J. (eds) Filozofia nauki, PWN, Warszawa, 297-305.Google Scholar

  • Such J., Szcześniak M., 1999, Filozofia nauki, [Philosophy of science]. Wyd. UAM, Poznań.Google Scholar

  • Sztompka P., 2002, Socjologia. Analiza społeczeństwa, [Sociology. Analysis of society], Znak, Kraków.Google Scholar

  • Tatarkiewicz W., 1945, Nauki nomologiczne i typologiczne [Nomothetic science, and typological] Sprawozdania PAU, t 46, nr 15.Google Scholar

  • Thrift N. 2002, The future of geography, Geoforum 33, 291-298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turner B. L. II, 2002, Contested Identities: Human environment geography and disciplinary implications in a restructuring Academy, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91, (1) 52-74.Google Scholar

  • Valentine G. 2000, Social geographies. Space & Society, Pearson Education Ltd, Harlow.Google Scholar

  • Viles H., 2005, A divide discipline? [in:] Castries N., Rogers A., Sherman D., (eds.) Questioning Geography. Fundamental Debates, Blackwell Publishing, Malden-Oxford, 26-38.Google Scholar

  • Wagner H., 1880, Bericht über die Entwicklung der Methodik der Geographie als Wissenschaft, Geographisches Jahrbuch, 8, 523-598.Google Scholar

  • Wallerstein I. 1996, Open the social sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commision on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences, Stanford.Google Scholar

  • Wallis A., 1971, Socjologia i kształtowanie przestrzeni, [Sociology and shaping of space], PIW, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Werlen B., 1993, Society, action and space. Routledge, London-New York.Google Scholar

  • World Social Science Report 2010, Knowledge Divides, UNESCO Publishing, International Social Science Council, Paris.Google Scholar

  • Zaborski B., Wrzosek A. 1939, Antropogeografia [Anthropogeography], Trzaska, Evert, Michalski, Warszawa.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2012-08-13

Published in Print: 2011-01-01

Citation Information: Miscellanea Geographica - Regional Studies on Development, Volume 15, Issue , Pages 9–40, ISSN (Online) 2084-6118, ISSN (Print) 0867-6046, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10288-012-0001-x.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in