Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.40

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.404

Covered by e.g. Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, and SCOPUS by Elsevier
14 points in the Ministerial journal value rating scale

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Policies on intergroup relations in Central and East European cities: a comparative analysis of Budapest, Prague, Wrocław and Tallinn

Josef Kohlbacher
  • Institut für Stadt- und Regionalforschung Zentrum Sozialwissenschaften, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Patrycja Matusz Protasiewicz
Published Online: 2012-12-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10288-012-0026-1


This article explores the differences in the understanding of ‘intergroup relations’ and measures underaken in the area of intercultural policies in four Central and East European (CEE) cities: Budapest, Prague, Wrocław and Tallinn. The analysis is based on interviews and field research carried out in 2008 in these cities in cooperation with local scientific experts, representatives of the ethnic communities and officials of the Municipalities as part of the Eurofound research project CLIP1. It explores the national and local political frameworks for intergroup policy and the target groups for such strategies and policies. The main aim of this article is to carry out a comparative analysis of four cities from the CEE countries in order to indicate the similarities and differences in the understanding of intergroup relations. It investigates the type of actors involved in this process and whether their actions are catalysed from the top-down or bottom–up.

Keywords: CEE countries; intergroup policies; local policy-making; migration

  • Alexander, M 2007, Cities and labour immigration. Comparing policy responses in Amsterdam, Paris, Rome and Tel Aviv, Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar

  • Brouček, S 2003, Aktuálni problém adaptace vietnamského etnika w ČR, Etnologicy ustav AV ČR, PrahaGoogle Scholar

  • Caponio, T 2010, ‘Conclusion. Making Sense of Local Migration Policy Arenas’, in Caponio, T, Borkert, M, (eds.), The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking, IMISCOE Report Series, Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

  • Desponds, A, Lesińska M 2008, ‘Obecność i funkcjonowanie społeczności imigranckich w Polsce. Przypadek Ukraińców i Wietnamczyków we Wrocławiu’, in: Grzymała-Kazłowska, A, Między jednością a wielością. Integracja odmiennych grup i kategorii imigrantów w Polsce, OBM, WarsawGoogle Scholar

  • Drbohlav, D 2009, Czechia as a New Immigration Country? IDEA Working Papers, PragueGoogle Scholar

  • Hárs, Á, et al 2009 Immigration countries in Central and Eastern Europe. The Case of Hungary, Idea Working Papers, BudapestGoogle Scholar

  • Dutkiewicz, R 2006, The Strategy ”Wroclaw in the Perspective 2020 plus”. Avaliable from <http://bip.um.wroc.pl/wps/wcm/connect/5f 3b6680453b27dab9caf9ffcdc6cfec/strategia_Wroclaw2020plus_ en.pdf?MOD=AJPERES>. [30 April 2012].Google Scholar

  • Irimiás, A 2008, ‘A Budapesten élő kínai közösség’ (‘The Chinese community living in Budapest’), Földrajzi Értesítő. LVII, pp. 469-481Google Scholar

  • Kępińska, E 2007, ‘Recent Trends in International Migration. The 2007 SOPEMI Report for Poland;, CMR Working Papers, No. 29/(87), WarsawGoogle Scholar

  • Matusz Protasiewicz, P 2009a, Intergroup relations and intercultural policies, case of Tallinn (Estonia), Eurofound. Avaliable from <http:// www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/populationandsociety/clip.htm>. [30 June 2012].Google Scholar

  • Matusz Protasiewicz, P 2009b, Intergroup relations and intercultural policies, case of Wrocław (Poland), Eurofound. Avaliable from <http:// www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/populationandsociety/clip.htm>. [30 June 2012].Google Scholar

  • Nyíri, P 2007, Chinese in Russia and Eastern Europe: A Middleman Minority in a Transnational Era, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

  • Reinvelt, R 2000, Integration, Multinational Estonia and Estonian-Language Press. Soviet – Time Immigrants in Newspapers Edasi/Postimees in 1998-2000, Integration Foundation.Google Scholar

  • Tesser, M, L 2005, The impact of the post-cold war European Minority Rights regime on inter- ethnic relations in Estonia and Latvia. Avaliable from <http://aei.pitt.edu/3171/>. [20 April 2010].Google Scholar

  • Tóth, J 2009, Hungary, in: ‘Annual Overview of International Migration in Central and Eastern Europe – 2009’. Avaliable from http://www.migrationonline. cz/centraleasterneurope/2009/#n3>. [20 June 2010].Google Scholar

  • Czech Statistical Office 2009, Foreigners in the Czech Republic 2008. Avaliable from <http://www.czso.cz/csu/2008edicniplan.nsf/engkapitola/ 1414-08-2008-0900>. [20 August 2010].Google Scholar

  • European Union Council Directive 2003/109/EC. Avaliable from <http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:016:00 44:0053:en:pdf>. [25 August 2010].Google Scholar

  • Hálózat 2011. Avaliable from <http://www.halozat.info.hu/node>. [10 March 2012].Google Scholar

  • State Integration Program 2008-2013 Estonia. Avaliable from <http://www.kul.ee/webeditor/files/integratsioon/Loimumiskava _2008_2013_ENG.pdf>. [12 June 2010].Google Scholar

  • Statistical Office of Estonia <http://www.stat.ee/statistics>. [20 August 2012].Google Scholar

  • Statistical Office of Hungary <http://www.ksh.hu/>. [10 September 2010].Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2012-07-18

Accepted: 2012-10-08

Published Online: 2012-12-22

Citation Information: Miscellanea Geographica - Regional Studies on Development, Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 5–10, ISSN (Online) 2084-6118, ISSN (Print) 0867-6046, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10288-012-0026-1.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in