Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.40

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.404

14 points
in the Ministerial journal value rating scale.

Covered by e.g. Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, formerly Thomson Reuters) and SCOPUS by Elsevier

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2084-6118
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Structure, function and cross-scale properties of landscape boundaries – a case study of the Płock area

Sylwia Kulczyk
  • Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies University of Warsaw
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-12-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10288-012-0046-x

Abstract

The paper describes features of landscape boundaries in the lowland landscape of Poland and verifies their cross-scale properties. The diversity of lithology, morphometry and land use was taken into account by delimitation of the boundaries. A scale of 1:50 000 was set as the basis. Three structural features (length, contrast and sinuosity) and two functional features (permeability and stability) were examined.

The boundaries within the research area are typically of average length, low sinuosity, high permeability and low stability. A high correspondence between the diversity of abiotic components and land use is observed, resulting in a large number of high-contrast boundaries. However, this feature does not necessarily mean that these patterns are cross scale and can be applied at a higher level of landscape hierarchy.

A geochemical/typological and regional order has been explored to describe properties of landscape boundaries for different spatial scales. Only the first of the listed orders corresponds to diversification of boundary features.

Keywords: Landscape; boundary; structural features; functional features; spatial hierarchy

  • Armand, DL 1980, Nauka o krajobrazie [The Science of Landscape], PWN, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Cadenasso, ML, Pickett, STA, Weathers, KC & Jones, CG 2003, ‘A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries’, BioScience, vol. 53, pp.750–758.Google Scholar

  • Desaigues, B 1990, ‘The socio-economic value of ecotones’ in The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones, eds RJ Naiman & H Décamps, MAB, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar

  • Farina, A 1998, Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology, Chapman&Hall, London.Google Scholar

  • Forman, RTT & Moore, PN 1992, ‘Theoretical Foundations for Understanding Boundaries in Landscape Mosaics’ in Landscape Boundaries, eds AJ Hansen & F di Castri, Ecological Studies, vol. 92, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar

  • Fortin, MJ, Olson, RJ, Ferson, S, Iverson, L, Hunsaker, C, Edwards, G, Levine, D, Butera, K & Klemas, V 2000, ‘Issues related to the detection of boundaries’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 15, pp. 453–466.Google Scholar

  • Jacquer, GM, Maruca, S & Fortin, MJ 2000, ‘From fields to objects: A review of geographic boundary analysis’, Journal of Geographical Systems, vol. 2, pp. 221–241.Google Scholar

  • Jagomagi, JE & Mander, JE 1982, ‘Poniatie ekotona i wozmożnosti jego uspołzowania pri ocenkie teritori’ in Issliedowanie i kartografirowanie landszafta, Acta et Comentationes Universitatis Tartuensis, Tartu.Google Scholar

  • Kulczyk, S 2004, ‘Landscape Boundaries – Belts or Lines? Examples from Southern and Northern Poland’, Miscellanea Geographica, vol.10, pp. 19–27.Google Scholar

  • Kulczyk, S 2005, ‘Funkcjonalne cechy granic krajobrazowych na przykładzie Wigierskiego Parku Narodowego’ [Functional Features of Landscape Boundaries – example of Wigierski National Park], Prace i Studia Geograficzne, vol. 36, pp. 48–64.Google Scholar

  • Kulczyk, S 2006, ‘Caracterizacíon de los limites naturales: un caso del area de Chroberz’ [Characteristisc of natural boundaries: case study of Chroberz area], Revista Electronic@de Medioambiente UCM, vol. 2, pp. 104–119, Available from: http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/MARE/ article/view/MARE0606220104A/15259 [29.08.2013].Google Scholar

  • Miller, GP, Petlin, WN & Galambosz, J 1982, ‘O dinamikie i ustojcziwosti prirodnych tierritorialnych kompleksow’ [On dynamic and stability of natural spatial complexes], Woprosy Gieografii, vol. 121.Google Scholar

  • Pietrzak, M 1998, Syntezy krajobrazowe – założenia, problemy, zastosowania [Landscape Syntheses – Assumption, Problems, Applications], Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.Google Scholar

  • Pietrzak, M 2000, ‘Granice krajobrazowe – fikcja czy rzeczywistość?’ [Landscape boundaries – fiction of reality?], Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, vol. 7, pp.189–197.Google Scholar

  • Richling, A 1974, Analiza struktury środowiska geograficznego i nowa metoda regionalizacji fizycznogeograficznej (na przykładzie województwa białostockiego), manuscript. Richling, A 1992, Kompleksowa geografia fizyczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Richling, A, Malinowska, E & Lechnio J 2005, ‘Typologia i regionalizacja krajobrazu terenów w strefie oddziaływania Płockiego Zespołu Miejsko-Przemysłowego’ [Typology and regionalisation of landscape within the zone of influence of Płock urban-industrial complex] in Z problematyki Funkcjonowania Krajobrazów Nizinnych, eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR UW, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Śleszyński, TP 1997, Ocena atrakcyjności wizualnej krajobrazu okolic Pińczowa, master thesis, Departament of Geoecology, WGSR UW.Google Scholar

  • Soczawa, WB 1978, Wwiedienije w uczenije o gieosistemach, Nauka, Nowosybirsk.Google Scholar

  • Weinstein, DA 1992, ‘Use of Simulation Models to Evaluate the Alteration of Ecotones by Global Carbon Dioxide Increases’, in Landscape Boundaries, eds AJ Hansen & F di Castri, Ecological Studies, vol. 92, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar

  • Wiens, JA 1992, ‘Ecological Flows Across Landscape Boundaries: A Conceptual Overview’ in Landscape Boundaries, eds AJ Hansen & F di Castri, Ecological Studies, vol. 92, Springer-Verlag, New York. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-12-27


Citation Information: Miscellanea Geographica - Regional Studies on Development, ISSN (Print) 2084-6118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10288-012-0046-x.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in