Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.40

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.404

14 points
in the Ministerial journal value rating scale.

Covered by e.g. Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, formerly Thomson Reuters) and SCOPUS by Elsevier

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2084-6118
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Mapping vegetation communities of the Karkonosze National Park using APEX hyperspectral data and Support Vector Machines

Adriana Marcinkowska / Bogdan Zagajewski / Adrian Ochtyra
  • College of Inter-Faculty Individual Studies in Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Warsaw Department of Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Anna Jarocińska / Edwin Raczko / Lucie Kupková / Premysl Stych / Koen Meuleman
Published Online: 2014-06-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0007

Abstract

This research aims to discover the potential of hyperspectral remote sensing data for mapping mountain vegetation ecosystems. First, the importance of mountain ecosystems to the global system should be stressed due to mountainous ecosystems forming a very sensitive indicator of global climate change. Furthermore, a variety of biotic and abiotic factors influence the spatial distribution of vegetation in the mountains, producing a diverse mosaic leading to high biodiversity.

The research area covers the Szrenica Mount region on the border between Poland and the Czech Republic - the most important part of the Western Karkonosze and one of the main areas in the Karkonosze National Park (M&B Reserve of the UNESCO).

The APEX hyperspectral data that was classified in this study was acquired on 10th September 2012 by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) in the framework of the EUFAR HyMountEcos project. This airborne scanner is a 288-channel imaging spectrometer operating in the wavelength range 0.4-2.5 μm.

For reference patterns of forest and non-forest vegetation, maps (provided by the Polish Karkonosze National Park) were chosen. Terrain recognition was based on field walks with a Trimble GeoXT GPS receiver. It allowed test and validation dominant polygons of 15 classes of vegetation communities to be selected, which were used in the Support Vector Machines (SVM) classification. The SVM classifier is a type of machine used for pattern recognition. The result is a post classification map with statistics (total, user, producer accuracies, kappa coefficient and error matrix). Assessment of the statistics shows that almost all the classes were properly recognised, excluding the fern community. The overall classification accuracy is 79.13% and the kappa coefficient is 0.77. This shows that hyperspectral images and remote sensing methods can be support tools for the identification of the dominant plant communities of mountain areas.

Keywords: Hyperspectral data; APEX; Karkonosze National Park; mapping/ classification; vegetation communities

References

  • Benediktsson, JA & Waske, B 2009, ‘Next Frontier for Classification Tools: SVM and Beyond, 3rd HYPER-I-NET School on Hyperspectral Imaging’, Data Processing: from hyperspectral images to information, Pavia. Available from: http://hyperinet.multimediacampus.it/images/Benediktsson.pdf>. [8-11 September 2009].Google Scholar

  • Biuro Urządzenia Lasu i Geodezji Leśnej 2009. Available from: <http://www.buligl.pl/web/biuro-urzadzania-lasu-en/home>.Google Scholar

  • Burges, CJC 1998, ‘A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition, data mining and knowledge discovery’, Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol. 2, pp. 121-167.Google Scholar

  • Camps-Valls, G, Gomez-Chova, L, Calpe-Maravilla, J, Martin- Guerrero, JD, Soria-Olivas, E, Alonso-Chorda, L & Moreno, J 2004, ‘Robust support vector method for hyperspectral data classification and knowledge discovery’, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1530-1542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chan, JCW, Beckers, P, Spanhove, T & Vanden Borre, T 2012, ‘An evaluation of ensemble classifiers for mapping Natura 2000 heathland in Belgium using spaceborne angular hyperspectral (CHRIS/Proba) imagery’, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 18, pp. 13-22.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dalponte, M, Bruzzone, L & Gianelle, D 2008, ‘Fusion of hyperspectral and LIDAR Remote sensing data for classification of complex forest areas’, IEEE Transactions On Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1416-1427.Google Scholar

  • Delalieux, S, Somers, B, Haest, B, Kooistra, L, Mücher, CA & Vanden Borre, J 2010, ‘Monitoring heathland habitat status using hyperspectral image classification and unmixing’, Proceedings of the 2nd Whispers on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), IEEE GRSS, University of Iceland, Reykjawik, pp. 50-54.Google Scholar

  • Dixon, B & Candade, N 2008, ‘Multispectral landuse classification using neural networks and support vector machines: one or the other, or both?’, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1185-1206.Google Scholar

  • Goetz, AFH 2009, ‘Three decades of hyperspectral remote sensing of the Earth: A personal view’, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 113, pp. S5-S16.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gualtieri, JA & Cromp, RF 1998, Support vector machines for hyperspectral remote Sensing classification, Proceedings of the 27th AIPR Workshop’, Advances in Computer Assisted Recognition, pp. 221-232.Google Scholar

  • Huang, C, Davis, LS & Townshend, JRG 2002, ‘An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification’, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 23 pp. 725-749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Itten, KI, Dell’Endice, F, Hueni, A, Kneubühler, M, Schläpfer, D, Odermatt, D, Seidel, D, Huber, S, Schopfer, J, Kellenberger, T, Bühler, Y, D’Odorico, P, Nieke, J, Alberti, E & Meuleman, K 2008, ‘APEX - the hyperspectral ESA airborne prism experiment’, Sensors, vol. 8, pp. 6235-6259.Google Scholar

  • Kokaly, RF, Despain, DG, Clark, RN & Livo, KE 2003, ‘Mapping vegetation in Yellowstone National Park using spectral feature analysis of AVIRIS data’, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 84, pp. 437-456.Google Scholar

  • Olesiuk, D, Bachmann, M, Habermeyer, M, Heldens, W & Zagajewski, B 2009, ‘Crop classification with neural networks using airborne hyperspectral imagery’, Roczniki Geomatyki, vol. VII, no. 32, pp. 107-112.Google Scholar

  • Pal, M & Mather, PM 2004, ‘Assessment of the effectiveness of support vector machines for hyperspectral data’, Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1215-1225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pal, M & Mather, PM 2006, ‘Some issues in the classification of DAIS hyperspectral data’. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 27, pp. 2895-2916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Szymura, TH, Dunajski, A, Aman, I, Makowski, M, & Szymura, M 2007, ‘The spatial pattern and microsites requirements of Abies alba natural regeneration in the Karkonosze Mountains’, Dendrobiology, vol. 58, pp. 51-57.Google Scholar

  • Wojtuń, B, Żołnierz, L & Raj, A 2004, ‘Nowy operat ochrony ekosystemów nieleśnych Karkonoskiego Parku Narodowego, Geoekologické problémy Krkonoš’, Opera Corcontica, vol. 41, pp. 560-567.Google Scholar

  • Zagajewski, B 2010, ‘Ocena przydatności sieci neuronowych i danych hiperspektralnych do klasyfikacji roślinności Tatr Wysokich’ (Assessment of neural networks and Imaging Spectroscopy for vegetation classification of the High Tatras), Teledetekcja Środowiska, vol. 43.Google Scholar

  • Zagajewski, B & Sobczak, M 2003, ‘Field remote sensing techniques for mountains vegetation investigation’, Proceedings of the 3rd EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, Oberpfaffenhofen, pp. 580-596.Google Scholar

  • Zagajewski, B, Kozłowska, A, Krówczyńska, M, Sobczak, M & Wrzesień, M 2005, ‘Mapping high mountain vegetation using hyperspectral data’. EARSeL eProceedings, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 70-78. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2013-09-03

Accepted: 2013-12-30

Published Online: 2014-06-17

Published in Print: 2014-06-01


Citation Information: Miscellanea Geographica, ISSN (Online) 2084-6118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0007.

Export Citation

© by Adriana Marcinkowska. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Lucie Kupková, Lucie Červená, Renáta Suchá, Lucie Jakešová, Bogdan Zagajewski, Stanislav Březina, and Jana Albrechtová
European Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, Volume 50, Number 1, Page 29
[3]
Adriana Marcinkowska-Ochtyra, Bogdan Zagajewski, Adrian Ochtyra, Anna Jarocińska, Bronisław Wojtuń, Christian Rogass, Christian Mielke, and Samantha Lavender
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, Volume 38, Number 7, Page 1839
[4]
Kristin Vreys, Marian-Daniel Iordache, Bart Bomans, and Koen Meuleman
Miscellanea Geographica, 2016, Volume 20, Number 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in