Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.40

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.404

14 points
in the Ministerial journal value rating scale.

Covered by e.g. Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, formerly Thomson Reuters) and SCOPUS by Elsevier

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2084-6118
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Error simulations of uncorrected NDVI and DCVI during remote sensing measurements from UAS

Michał T. Chiliński
  • Department of Geoinformation and Remote Sensing Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies University of Warsaw, Institute of Geophysics University of Warsaw
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marek Ostrowski
Published Online: 2014-06-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0017

Abstract

Remote sensing from unmanned aerial systems (UAS) has been gaining popularity in the last few years. In the field of vegetation mapping, digital cameras converted to calculate vegetation index (DCVI) are one of the most popular sensors. This paper presents simulations using a radiative transfer model (libRadtran) of DCVI and NDVI results in an environment of possible UAS flight scenarios. The analysis of the results is focused on the comparison of atmosphere influence on both indices. The results revealed uncertainties in uncorrected DCVI measurements up to 25% at the altitude of 5 km, 5% at 1 km and around 1% at 0.15 km, which suggests that DCVI can be widely used on small UAS operating below 0.2 km.

Keywords: Remote sensing; vegetation index; digital camera; UAS; atmospheric correction

References

  • Anderson, G, Clough, S, Kneizys, F, Chetwynd, J & Shettle, E 1986, ‘AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0-120 km)’, Tech. Rep. AFGL-TR-86-0110, Air Force Geophys. Lab., Hanscom Air Force Base, Bedford, Mass.Google Scholar

  • Burgheimer, J, Wilske, B, Maseyk, K, Karnieli, A, Zaady, E, Yakir, D & Kesselmeier, J 2006, ‘Relationships between Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and carbon fluxes of biologic soil crusts assessed by ground measurements’, J. Arid Environ, vol. 64, pp. 651-669.Google Scholar

  • Chiliński, M 2010, Fundamentals of imaging, remote sensing method for assessing the state of vegetation and verification of its usefulness in environmental studies, Bachelor thesis on University of Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Chiliński, M 2012, Improvement of Data Acquiring in LNDVI Method and Comparison of it’s Results with Hyperspectral Spectrometer Measurements, Master thesis on University of Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Chrysoulakis, N, Abrams, M, Feidas, H & Arai, K 2010, ‘Comparison of atmospheric correction methods using ASTER data for the area of Crete, Greece’, International Journal Of Remote Sensing, vol. 31, no. 24, pp. 6347-6385.Google Scholar

  • Fischer, T, Veste, M, Eisele, A, Bens, O, Spyra, W & Hüttl, RF 2012, ‘Small scale spatial heterogeneity of Normalized Difference Vegetation Indices (NDVIs) and hot spots of photosynthesis in biological soil crusts’, Flora, vol. 207, pp. 159-167.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hardin, PJ & Hardin, TJ 2010, ‘Small-scale remotely piloted vehicles in environmental research’, Geography Compass, vol. 4, pp. 1297-1311.Google Scholar

  • Hess, M, Koepke, P & Schult, I 1998, ‘Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC’, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 79, pp. 831-844. The HITRAN Database 2012. Available from: <http://www.cfa. harvard.edu/hitran/>. [11 October 2013].Google Scholar

  • Holben, BN, Eck, TF, Slutsker, I, Tanré, D, Buis, JP, Setzer, A, Vermote, E, Reagan, JA, Kaufman, YJ, Nakajima, T, Lavenu, F, Jankowiak, I & Smirnov, A 1998, ‘AERONET A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization’, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 66, pp. 1-16.Google Scholar

  • Hunt, ER, Cavigelli, M, Daughtry, CST, McMurtrey, JE & Walthall, CL 2005, ‘Evaluation of digital photography from model aircraft for remote sensing of crop biomass and nitrogen status’, Precision Agriculture, vol. 6, pp. 359-37.Google Scholar

  • Ichii, K, Matsui, Y, Yamaguchi, Y & Ogawa, K 2001, ‘Comparison of global net primary production trends obtained from satellite based normalized difference vegetation index and carbon cycle model’, Global Biogeochem, Cycles, vol. 15, pp. 351-364.Google Scholar

  • Kylling, A & Stamnes, K 1992, ‘Effcient yet accurate solution of the linear transport equation in the presence of internal sources: the exponential-linear-in-depth approximation’, J. Com. Phys., vol. 102, pp. 265-276.Google Scholar

  • Lelong, CCD, Burger, P, Jubelin, G, Roux, B, Labbe, S & Barett, F 2008, ‘Assessment of unmanned aerial vehicles imagery for quantitative monitoring of wheat crop in small plots’, Sensors, vol. 8, pp. 3557-3585. libRatran, 2013. Available from: < http://www.libradtran.org>.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Markowicz, KM, Zielinski, T, Blindheim, D, Gausa, M, Jagodnicka, AK, Kardas, A, Kumala, W, Malinowski, SP, Posyniak, M, Petelski, T & Stacewicz, T 2012, ‘Study of vertical structure of aerosol optical properties by sun photometers and ceilometer during macron campaign in 2007’, Acta Geophys., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1308-1337.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Myneni, RB, Keeling, CD, Tucker, CJ, Asrar, G & Nemani, RR 1997, ‘Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991’, Nature, vol. 386, pp. 698-702.Google Scholar

  • Nebiker, S, Annen, A, Scherrer, M & Oesch, D 2008, ‘A lightweight multispectral sensor for micro UAV. Opportunities for very high resolution airborne remote sensing. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry’, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XXXVII Part B1, pp. 1193-120.Google Scholar

  • Rango, A, Laliberte, AS, Herrick, JE, Winters, C, Havstad, K, Steele, C & Browning, D 2009, ‘Unmanned aerial vehicle-based remote sensing for rangeland assessment, monitoring, and management’, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, vol. 3.Google Scholar

  • Rouse, J, Haas, R, Well, J & Deering, D 1973, ‘Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with erts’, In Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium, vol. I, Technical Presentations Section A, pp. 309-317.Google Scholar

  • Running, SW 1990, ‘Estimating terrestrial primary productivity by combining remote sensing and ecosystem simulation’, Remote Sensing of Biosphere Functioning. Ecol. Stud., vol. 79, pp. 65-86.Google Scholar

  • Stamnes, K, S-Chee, T, Wiscombe, W & Kolf, J 1988, ‘Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media’, Applied Optics, vol. 27, pp. 2502-2509.Google Scholar

  • Tucker, CJ, Fung, IY, Keeling, CD & Gammon, RH 1986, ‘Relationship between atmospheric CO2 variations and a satellite-derived vegetation index’, Nature, vol. 319, pp. 195-199.Google Scholar

  • Xiang, H & Tian, L 2011, ‘Method for automatic georeferencing aerial remote sensing (RS) images from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform’, Biosystems Engineering, vol. 108, pp. 104-111.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wanner, W, Strahler, A, Hu, B, Lewis, P, Muller, JP, Li, X, Barker Schaaf, C & Barnsley, M 1997, ‘Global retrieval of bidirectional reflectance and albedo over land from EOS MODIS and MISR data. Theory and algorithm’, J. Geophys. Res., vol. 102, pp. 17143-17161.Google Scholar

  • Zawadzka, O, Markowicz, KM, Pietruczuk, A, Zielinski, T & Jarosławski, J 2013, ‘Impact of urban pollution emitted in Warsaw on aerosol properties’, Atmospheric Environment, vol. 69, pp. 1528.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, C & Kovacs, J 2012, ‘The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review’, Precision Agriculture, vol. 13, pp. 693-712. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2013-11-14

Accepted: 2014-04-08

Published Online: 2014-06-17

Published in Print: 2014-06-01


Citation Information: Miscellanea Geographica, ISSN (Online) 2084-6118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0017.

Export Citation

© by Michał T. Chiliński. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in