Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.40

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.404

14 points
in the Ministerial journal value rating scale.

Covered by e.g. Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, formerly Thomson Reuters) and SCOPUS by Elsevier

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2084-6118
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Towards a general theory of landscape systems: the integration of the geoecological and bioecological approaches

Neven Tandarić
Published Online: 2015-03-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0028

Abstract

Ever since its beginnings, landscape ecology has been developing in two different directions: the bioecological and the geoecological. While the bioecological approach is focused on the relationship between organisms and their abiotic environment, the geoecological approach is based on the relationship between human society and its, primarily abiotic, environment. Therefore, the geoecological approach can be applied in planning human use of the environment in a long term sustainable manner, while the bioecological approach could represent the basis for the planning of conservational and environmental usage. The merging of these two approaches will result in a comprehensive and more holistic landscape ecology, which will thus gain the potential for coordinating interdisciplinary landscape research and a more prominent role in contributing to spatial planning. The merge will also enhance attempts to create a general theory of landscape systems.

Keywords: Bioecology; geoecology; holism; landscape ecology; general theory of landscape systems

References

  • Ahern, J 2005, ‘Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable landscape planning’ in From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application eds B Tress, G Tress, G Fry & P Opdam, Springer, Frankfurt, pp. 119–131.Google Scholar

  • Barsch, H, Bastian, O, Beierkuhnlein, C, Bosshard, A, Breuste, J, Klötzli, F, Otl, K, Tress, B, Tress, G & Weiland, U 2002, ‘Application of landscape ecology’ in Development and Perspectives of Landscape Ecology eds O Bastian & U Steinhardt, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 307–432.Google Scholar

  • Bastian, O 2001, ‘Landscape Ecology – towards a unified discipline?’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 16, pp. 757–766.Google Scholar

  • Bonnin, M, Bruszik, A, Rientjes, S, Delbaere, B, van Uden, G, Léthier, H, Richard, D & Terry, A 2007, The Pan-European Ecological Network: Taking Stock, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar

  • Botequilha-Leitão, A & Ahern, J 2002, ‘Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 59, pp. 65–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brandt, J 1995, ‘Landscape ecology and the destiny of geography’, Landscape Ecological Papers, vol. 9, pp. 55–61.Google Scholar

  • Bryl, M & Łyczkowska, G 2010, ‘Spatial planning as an instrument for shaping an ecological network’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 28, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar

  • Chmielewski, TJ 2008, ‘Zmierzając ku ogólnej teorii systemów krajobrazowych’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 21, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar

  • Chmielewski, TJ 2011, ‘Landscape systems: spatial structure and speed of changes’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 30, pp. 23-30.Google Scholar

  • Chmielewski, TJ 2012, ‘Systemy krajobrazowe: Struktura – funkcjonowanie – planowanie’, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Cieszewska, A 2000, ‘Comparative landscape structure studies for land use planning – Przedborski landscape park case study’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 6, pp. 54–62.Google Scholar

  • Clements, F & Shelford, V 1939, Bio-ecology, Jonh Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar

  • Cushman, S, Evans, J & McGarigal, K 2010, ‘Landscape Ecology: Past, Present and Future’ in Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation, eds E Landguth & F Huettmann, Springer, New York, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar

  • Drdoš, J 1996, ‘A reflection on landscape ecology’, Ekológia (Bratislava), vol. 15, pp. 369–375.Google Scholar

  • Fahrig, L 2005, ‘When is a Landscape Perspective Important?’ in Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology, eds JA Wiens & MR Moss, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar

  • Farina, A 1993, ‘From global to regional landscape ecology’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 8, pp.153–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farina, A & Belgrano, A 2004, ‘The eco-field: a new paradigm for landscape ecology’, Ecological Research, vol. 19, pp. 107–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fernandes, J, Guiomar, N & Soares, A 2006, ‘Geometries in Landscape Ecology’, Journal of Mediterranean Ecology, vol. 7, no. 1-4, pp. 3–13.Google Scholar

  • Forman, RTT & Godron M 1986, Landscape ecology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar

  • Halás, M 2003, ‘Possibilities for the application of geography to land use planning’, Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Geographica, vol. 1, pp. 67–77.Google Scholar

  • Khoroshev, A 2010, ‘Multilevel analysis of landscape structure for land use decisions’ in Landscape ecology – methods, applications and interdisciplinary approach, eds M Barančoková, J Krajči, J Kollár & I Belčáková, Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences and Institute of Garden and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, pp. 99–112.Google Scholar

  • Leser, H 1997, Landschaftsökologie, Ulmer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

  • McAlpine, C, Seabrook, L, Rhodes, J, Maron, M, Smith, C, Bowen, M, Butler, S, Powell, O, Ryan, J, Fyfe, C, Adams-Hosking, C, Smith, A, Robertson, O, Howes, A & Cattarino, L 2010, ‘Can a problem-solving approach strengthen landscape ecology's contribution to sustainable landscape planning’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 25, pp. 1155–1168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Melnyk, A 2008, ‘Ecological analysis of landscapes’ in Methodology of landscape research, ed V Andreychouk, Sosnowiec, pp. 151–169.Google Scholar

  • Mezősi, G, Bárány-Kevei, I, Mucsi, L & Balogh, I 1993, ‘First results of GIS based geoecological mapping’, Acta Geographica Szegediensis, vol. 31, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar

  • Miklós, L 1994, Landscape ecological principles of the sustainable development, Roskilde University, Department of Geography and International Development Studies, Roskilde.Google Scholar

  • Miklós, L 1996, ‘Landscape-ecological theory and methodology: a goal oriented application of the traditional scientific theory and methodology to a branch of a new quality’, Ekológia (Bratislava), vol. 15, pp. 377–385.Google Scholar

  • Mizgajski, A, Breuste, J, Albert, C, Gruehn, D, Kozová, M, Miklós, L & Mörtberg, U 2010, ‘Implementation of landscape ecological knowledge – achievements and challenges’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 28, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar

  • Molles, M 2008, Ecology: Concepts and Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

  • Moss, MR, 2000a, ‘Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology, and ‘The transformation of agricultural landscapes’’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 15, pp. 303–311.Google Scholar

  • Moss, MR 2000b, ‘Landscape ecology: the need for a discipline?’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 6, pp. 174–187.Google Scholar

  • Naveh, Z 1991, ‘Some remarks on recent developments in landscape ecology as a transdisciplinary ecological and geographical science’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 5, pp. 65–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naveh, Z 2000, ‘What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 50, pp. 7–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naveh, Z 2002, ‘Foreword’ in: Development and Perspectives of Landscape Ecology, eds O Bastian & U Steinhardt, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. xxi-xxvii.Google Scholar

  • Naveh, Z 2005, ‘The transformation of landscape ecology and restoration ecology into transdisciplinary sciences of holistic landscape study, management and planning, conservation and restoration’ in: Transdisciplinary Challenges in Landscape Ecology and Restoration Ecology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 353–401Google Scholar

  • Neef, E 1967, Die theoretischen Grundlagen der Landschaftslehre, Hermann Haack: Geographisch-Kartographische Anstalt Gotha, Leipzig.Google Scholar

  • Neef, E 1982, ‘Stages in the development of landscape ecology’ in Perspectives in Landscape Ecology: Proceedings of the 1st International Congress in Landscape Ecology, eds S Tjallingii & A de Veer, Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar

  • Odum, E & Barrett, G 2005, Fundamentals of Ecology. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont.Google Scholar

  • Opdam, P, Foppen, R & Vos, C 2002, ‘Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 16, pp. 767–779.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ostaszewska, K 2004, ‘Four fundamental methodological problems of landscape geography’, Miscellanea Geographica, vol. 11, pp. 13–17.Google Scholar

  • Pavić, R 1987, ‘Osnove kompleksne ekologije i geoekologije za geografe – temeljne definicije i prijedlog nastavnog plana’, Geografski glasnik, vol. 49, pp. 90–96.Google Scholar

  • Rambo, T 1983, Conceptual Approaches to Human Ecology, East-West Environment and Policy Institute, Honolulu.Google Scholar

  • Richerson, P, Mulder, M & Vila, B 1996, Principles of Human Ecology, Simon & Schuster, Needham Heights.Google Scholar

  • Richling, A & Solon, J 1996, Ekologia krajobrazu. PAN, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Termorshuizen, J, Opdam, P & van den Brink, A 2007, ‘Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 79, pp. 374–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tress, G, Tress, B & Fry, G 2004, ‘Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 20, pp. 479–493.Google Scholar

  • Troll, C 1971, ‘Landscape ecology (geoecology) and biogeocenology: a terminological study’, GeoForum, vol. 8, pp. 43–46.Google Scholar

  • Turner, M 1989, ‘Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 20, pp. 171–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, M 2005, ‘Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science?’, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 36, pp. 319–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiens, JA 2002, ‘Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water’, Freshwater Biology, vol. 47, pp. 501–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiens, JA & Moss, MR 1999, ‘Preface’ in Issues in Landscape Ecology, eds JA Wiens & MR Moss, IALE, Snowmass.Google Scholar

  • Wu, J 2006, ‘Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 21, pp. 1–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wu, J 2008, ‘Making the Case for Landscape Ecology: An Effective Approach to Urban Sustainability’, Landscape Journal, vol. 27, pp.1–8Google Scholar

  • Wu, J & Hobbs, RJ 2002, ‘Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 17, pp. 355–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zonneveld, I 1972, Textbook of photo-interpretation, ITC, Enschede.Google Scholar

  • Zonneveld, I 1990, ‘Scope and Concepts of Landscape Ecology as an Emerging Science’ in Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective, eds I Zonneveld & RTT Forman, Springer, New York, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-06-01

Accepted: 2014-10-08

Published Online: 2015-03-20

Published in Print: 2015-03-01


Citation Information: Miscellanea Geographica, ISSN (Online) 2084-6118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0028.

Export Citation

© Neven Tandarić. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in